Electrostatic interactions ionic liquids

Thermodynamic information can also be obtained from simulations. Currently we are measuring the differences in chemical potential of various small molecules in dimethylimidazolium chloride. This involves gradually transforming one molecule into another and is a computationally intensive process. One preliminary result is that the difference in chemical potential of propane and dimethyl ether is about 17.5 kj/mol. These molecules are similar in size, but differ in their polarity. Not surprisingly, the polar ether is stabilized relative to the non-polar propane in the presence of the ionic liquid. One can also investigate the local arrangement of the ions around the solute and the contribution of different parts of the interaction to the energy. Thus, while both molecules have a favorable Lennard-Jones interaction with the cation, the main electrostatic interaction is that between the chloride ion and the ether molecule. 

The ion-ion electrostatic interaction contribution is kept as proposed by PITZER. BEUTIER estimates the ion - undissociated molecules interactions from BORN - DEBYE - MAC. AULAY electric work contribution, he correlates 8 and 8 parameters in PITZER S treatment with ionic standard entropies following BROMLEY S (9) approach and finally he fits a very limited (one or two) number of ternary parameters on ternary vapor-liquid equilibrium data. 

The behaviour of ternary systems consisting of two polymers and a solvent depends largely on the nature of interactions between components (1-4). Two types of limiting behaviour can be observed. The first one occurs in non-polar systems, where polymer-polymer interactions are very low. In such systems a liquid-liquid phase separation is usually observed each liquid phase contains almost the total quantity of one polymer species. The second type of behaviour often occurs in aqueous polymer solutions. The polar or ionic water-soluble polymers can interact to form macromolecular aggregates, occasionally insoluble, called "polymer complexes". Examples are polyanion-polycation couples stabilized through electrostatic interactions, or polyacid-polybase couples stabilized through hydrogen bonds. 

Figure 11 shows the phase boundary concentration data for aqueous Na salt xanthan [78], fd-virus [24], and TMV [23] with added salt. In all these systems, Ci and cA are very low at low added salt concentration Cs or ionic strength I, and increase with Cs or I. Since such low phase boundary concentrations are not usually observed for neutral liquid-crystalline polymer solutions, it is apparent that polyion electrostatic interactions play an important role in the phase equilibria of these systems. 

The interacting forces between ions in the ionic liquids are the strong electrostatic Coulombic forces. Ionic liquids have no measurable vapor pressure, and hence they may be used in high-vacuum systems to overcome many contaminant problems. Advantage of their non-volatile nature can be taken to conduct product separation by distillation with prevention of uncontrolled evaporation. 

Typically, solute-solvent interactions are divided into two broad categories Specific and nonspecific interactions. Specific interactions include phenomena such as hydrogen bonding and ji-ji interactions, which depend on the presence of particular functional groups or steric structures. They are short ranged, and are specific in the sense that they involve individual solvent species within the first solvation shell of the liquid. In contrast, nonspecific interactions represent interactions that are not associated with the presence of individual functional groups. In molecular liquids, these include dispersion and electrostatic interactions, such as dipole-dipole forces. We will discuss the nature of each type of interaction in ionic liquids in the sections that follow. 

The theory is based on two observations. First, solute-solvent interactions are characterized by dipole-ion interactions, and so are much weaker than the ion-ion interactions between solvent species. Thus, the presence of the solute dipole should not greatly perturb the liquid from the electrostatic structure of the neat liquid. Second, because the ionic liquid is a conductor, the electric field of the solute must be screened by the solvent. This observation has been confirmed... 

One implication of this framework is that the electrostatic component of solute-solvent interactions should correlate strongly with the charge density of the liquid. This result is confirmed by study of the variation of the Kamlet-Taft n parameter with the number density of an ionic liquid. The result is shown in Fig. 7 (taken from [239]). This figure shows a clear relationship between it and the number density of the IL, where no such relationship exists in molecular liquids. It... 

Figure 7. The Kamlet—Taft n parameter vs. solvent number density. Select molecular solvents possess little or no capacity for hydrogen bonding, and their interactions are controlled by electrostatics. Ionic liquids are categorized based on whether they possess a cyclic cation or an alkylammonium cation. A wide range of anions are employed in both categories, and no attempt is made to restrict specific interactions. Taken from Ref. [239]...

Brighteners which rely on electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions may function in ionic liquids but their efficacy is likely to be surface and cation/anion specific. As with other solutes in ionic liquids, the general rule of like dissolving like is applicable i.e. ionic species will generally be soluble as will species capable of interacting with the anion. Aromatic species tend to exhibit poor solubility in ionic liquids consisting of aliphatic cations and vice versa. 

Electrostatic interactions occur between the ionic head groups of the surfactant and the oppositely charged solid surface (head down adsorption with monolayer structure) [56]. Acid-base interactions occur due to hydrogen bonding or Lewis acid-Lewis base reactions between solid surface and surfactant molecules (head down with monolayer structure) [57]. Polarisation of jt electrons occurs between the surfactant head group which has electron-rich aromatic nuclei and the positively charged solid surface (head down with monolayer structure) [58]. Dispersion forces occur due to London-van der Waals forces between the surfactant molecules and the solid surface (hydrophobic tail lies flat on the hydrophobic solid surface while hydrophilic head orients towards polar liquid) [59]. 

The solubilisation of proteins and amino acids in organic solvents by reversed micelles provides a new method for the selective recovery, separation and concentration of bioproducts using liquid->liquid extraction techniques. Selectivity is affected by electrostatic interactions between the charged residues or moieties of the solute and the surfactant headgroups. These interactions are mediated by electrostatic screening as affected by solution ionic strength. The more hydrophobic the amino acid residue, the more favourable is the solubilisation of this residue in the partially structured water pool of the reversed micelle relative to the bulk, unstructured water phase. 

Nanostructures primarily result from polyelectrolyte or interpolyelectrolyte complexes (PEC). The PEC (also referred to as symplex [23]) is formed by the electrostatic interaction of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (PE) in solution. The formation of PEC is governed by physical and chemical characteristics of the precursors, the environment where they react, and the technique used to introduce the reactants. Thus, the strength and location of ionic sites, polymer chain rigidity and precursor geometries, pH, temperature, solvent type, ionic strength, mixing intensity and other controllable factors will affect the PEC product. Three different types of PEC have been prepared in water [40] (1) soluble PEC (2) colloidal PEC systems, and (3) two-phase systems of supernatant liquid and phase-separated PEC. These three systems are respectively characterized as ... 

---