Electrons wave theory

Theoretical interpretation of phase contrast images is complicated, particularly when more than one diffraction spot participates in image formation. The schematic illustration in Figure 3.22 does not reflect the complexity of phase contrast. The electron wave theory of phase contrast formation is explained briefly in the following section. 

Olsen J and J0rgensen P 1995 Time-dependent response theory with applioations to self-oonsistent field and multioonfigurational self-oonsistent field wave funotions Modern Electronic Structure Theory vo 2, ed D R Yarkony (Singapore World Soientifio) pp 857-990... 

To use direct dynamics for the study of non-adiabatic systems it is necessary to be able to efficiently and accurately calculate electronic wave functions for excited states. In recent years, density functional theory (DFT) has been gaining ground over traditional Hartree-Fock based SCF calculations for the treatment of the ground state of large molecules. Recent advances mean that so-called time-dependent DFT methods are now also being applied to excited states. Even so, at present, the best general methods for the treatment of the photochemistry of polyatomic organic molecules are MCSCF methods, of which the CASSCF method is particularly powerful. 

Adopting the view that any theory of aromaticity is also a theory of pericyclic reactions [19], we are now in a position to discuss pericyclic reactions in terms of phase change. Two reaction types are distinguished those that preserve the phase of the total electi onic wave-function - these are phase preserving reactions (p-type), and those in which the phase is inverted - these are phase inverting reactions (i-type). The fomier have an aromatic transition state, and the latter an antiaromatic one. The results of [28] may be applied to these systems. In distinction with the cyclic polyenes, the two basis wave functions need not be equivalent. The wave function of the reactants R) and the products P), respectively, can be used. The electronic wave function of the transition state may be represented by a linear combination of the electronic wave functions of the reactant and the product. Of the two possible combinations, the in-phase one [Eq. (11)] is phase preserving (p-type), while the out-of-phase one [Eq. (12)], is i-type (phase inverting), compare Eqs. (6) and (7). Normalization constants are assumed in both equations ... 

Valence bond and molecular orbital theory both incorporate the wave description of an atom s electrons into this picture of H2 but m somewhat different ways Both assume that electron waves behave like more familiar waves such as sound and light waves One important property of waves is called interference m physics Constructive interference occurs when two waves combine so as to reinforce each other (m phase) destructive interference occurs when they oppose each other (out of phase) (Figure 2 2) Recall from Section 1 1 that electron waves m atoms are characterized by their wave function which is the same as an orbital For an electron m the most stable state of a hydrogen atom for example this state is defined by the Is wave function and is often called the Is orbital The valence bond model bases the connection between two atoms on the overlap between half filled orbifals of fhe fwo afoms The molecular orbital model assembles a sef of molecular orbifals by combining fhe afomic orbifals of all of fhe atoms m fhe molecule... 

From electronic structure theory it is known that the repulsion is due to overlap of the electronic wave functions, and furthermore that the electron density falls off approximately exponentially with the distance from the nucleus (the exact wave function for the hydrogen atom is an exponential function). There is therefore some justification for choosing the repulsive part as an exponential function. The general form of the Exponential - R Ey w function, also known as a ""Buckingham " or ""Hill" type potential is... 

In developing perturbation theory it was assumed that the solutions to the unpermrbed problem formed a complete set. This is general means that there must be an infinite number of functions, which is impossible in actual calculations. The lowest energy solution to the unperturbed problem is the HF wave function, additional higher energy solutions are excited Slater determinants, analogously to the Cl method. When a finite basis set is employed it is only possible to generate a finite number of excited determinants. The expansion of the many-electron wave function is therefore truncated. 

It is important to realize that whenever qualitative or frontier molecular orbital theory is invoked, the description is within the orbital (Hartree-Fock or Density Functional) model for the electronic wave function. In other words, rationalizing a trend in computational results by qualitative MO theory is only valid if the effect is present at the HF or DFT level. If the majority of the variation is due to electron correlation, an explanation in terms of interacting orbitals is not appropriate. 

J. Olsen and P. Jorgensen. Time-Dependent Response Theory with Applications to Self-Consistent Field and Multiconfigurational Self-Consistent Field Wave Functions, in Modern Electronic Structure Theory, edited by D. R. Yarkony, volume 2, chapter 13, pp. 857-990. World Scientific, Singapore, 1995. 

Absorption and emission spectroscopies provide experimental values for the quantized energies of atomic electrons. The theory of quantum mechanics provides a mathematical explanation that links quantized energies to the wave characteristics of electrons. These wave properties of atomic electrons are described by the Schrddinger equation, a complicated mathematical equation with numerous terms describing the kinetic and potential energies of the atom. 

In this study where we are interested in isotope substituted systems, that is in systems with the same electronic wave function, a more global approach can be used. From Table 2 it is obvious that MP3 calculations give the best overall results. The compensation of errors that we find here is a general characteristic of this level of wave function, as illustrated by previous calculations on various series of molecules [16]. Thus, we will use the MP3 level of theory together with the formula... 

Brus, L. E. (1986) Electronic wave functions in semiconductor clusters experiment and theory. J. Phys. Chem., 90, 2555-2560. 

In this section we will approach the question which is at the very heart of density functional theory can we possibly replace the complicated N-electron wave function with its dependence on 3N spatial plus N spin variables by a simpler quantity, such as the electron density After using plausibility arguments to demonstrate that this seems to be a sensible thing to do, we introduce two early realizations of this idea, the Thomas-Fermi model and Slater s approximation of Hartree-Fock exchange defining the X(/ method. The discussion in this chapter will prepare us for the next steps, where we will encounter physically sound reasons why the density is really all we need. 

In the PP theory, the valence electron wave function is composed of two parts. The main part is the pseudo-wave function describing a relatively smooth-varying behavior of the electron. The second part describes a spatially rapid oscillation of the valence electron near the atomic core. This atomic-electron-like behavior is due to the fact that, passing the vicinity of an atom, the valence electron recalls its native outermost atomic orbitals under a relatively stronger atomic potential near the core. Quantum mechanically the situation corresponds to the fact that the valence electronic state should be orthogonal to the inner-core electronic states. The second part describes this CO. The CO terms explicitly contain the information of atomic position and atomic core orbitals. 

Shepard R (1995) The analytic gradient method for configuration interaction wave functions. Yarkony DR (ed) In Modern electronic structure theory part I, World Scientific, Singapore, p 345... 

In the partial wave theory free electrons are treated as waves. An electron with momentum k has a wavefunction y(k,r), which is expressed as a linear combination of partial waves, each of which is separable into an angular function Yi (0. ) (a spherical harmonic) and a radial function / L(k,r),... 

An expression for e(k) in the case of a Fermi gas of free electrons can be obtained by considering the effect of an introduced point charge potential, small enough so the arguments of perturbation theory are valid. In the absence of this potential, the electronic wave functions are plane waves V 1/2exp(ik r), where V is the volume of the system, and the electron density is uniform. The point charge potential is screened by the electrons, so that the potential felt by an electron, O, is due to the point charge and to the other electrons, whose wave functions are distorted from plane waves. The electron density and the potential are related by the Poisson equation,... 

A simple model was considered above. A more refined theory taking into account the modulation of the electron wave function of the complex AL by fluctuations of the medium polarization is given in Ref. 35. 

---