Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron microscopy structural information from

Dark field Visualization technique for ashes produced by microincineration and fluorescence microscopy useful for low-contrast subjects Electron systems imaging EM shadowing Detection, localization, and quantitation of light elements Structural information from ordered arrays of macromolecules... [Pg.29]

The origins of analytical electron microscopy go back only about 15 years when the first x-ray spectra were obtained from submicron diameter areas of thin specimens in an electron microscope [1]. Characterization of catalyst materials using AEM is even more recent[2,3] but is currently a very active research area in several industrial and academic laboratories. The primary advantage of this technique for catalyst research is that it is the only technique that can yield chemical and structural information from individual submicron catalyst particles. [Pg.305]

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is probably the most powerful technique for obtaining structural information of supported nanoparticles [115-118], Complementary methods are STM, AFM, and SEM. Both the latter and TEM analysis provide more or less detailed size, shape, and morphology information, i.e., imaging in real space. TEM has the great additional advantage to provide information in Fourier transform space, i.e., diffraction information, which can be transformed to crystal structure information. From a practical point of view, considering the kinds of planar model catalysts discussed above, STM, AFM, and SEM are more easily applied for analysis than TEM, since the former three can be applied without additional sample preparation, once the model catalyst is made. In contrast, TEM usually requires one or more additional preparation steps. In this section, we concentrate on recent developments of microfabrication methods to prepare flat TEM membrane supports, or windows, by lithographic methods, which eliminate the requirement of postfabrication preparation of model catalysts for TEM analysis. For a more comprehensive treatment of other, more conventional, procedures to make flat TEM supports, and also similar microfabrication procedures as described here, we refer to previous reviews [118-120]. [Pg.304]

Four different material probes were used to characterize the shock-treated and shock-synthesized products. Of these, magnetization provided the most sensitive measure of yield, while x-ray diffraction provided the most explicit structural data. Mossbauer spectroscopy provided direct critical atomic level data, whereas transmission electron microscopy provided key information on shock-modified, but unreacted reactant mixtures. The results of determinations of product yield and identification of product are summarized in Fig. 8.2. What is shown in the figure is the location of pressure, mean-bulk temperature locations at which synthesis experiments were carried out. Beside each point are the measures of product yield as determined from the three probes. The yields vary from 1% to 75 % depending on the shock conditions. From a structural point of view a surprising result is that the product composition is apparently not changed with various shock conditions. The same product is apparently obtained under all conditions only the yield is changed. [Pg.182]

Further structural information is available from physical methods of surface analysis such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron or Auger electron spectroscopy (XPS), or secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), and transmission or reflectance IR and UV/VIS spectroscopy. The application of both electroanalytical and surface spectroscopic methods has been thoroughly reviewed and appropriate methods are given in most of the references of this chapter. [Pg.60]

Figure 37-9. The eukaryotic basal transcription complex. Formation of the basal transcription complex begins when TFIID binds to the TATA box. It directs the assembly of several other components by protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. The entire complex spans DNA from position -30 to +30 relative to the initiation site (+1, marked by bent arrow). The atomic level, x-ray-derived structures of RNA polymerase II alone and ofTBP bound to TATA promoter DNA in the presence of either TFIIB or TFIIA have all been solved at 3 A resolution. The structure of TFIID complexes have been determined by electron microscopy at 30 A resolution. Thus, the molecular structures of the transcription machinery are beginning to be elucidated. Much of this structural information is consistent with the models presented here. Figure 37-9. The eukaryotic basal transcription complex. Formation of the basal transcription complex begins when TFIID binds to the TATA box. It directs the assembly of several other components by protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. The entire complex spans DNA from position -30 to +30 relative to the initiation site (+1, marked by bent arrow). The atomic level, x-ray-derived structures of RNA polymerase II alone and ofTBP bound to TATA promoter DNA in the presence of either TFIIB or TFIIA have all been solved at 3 A resolution. The structure of TFIID complexes have been determined by electron microscopy at 30 A resolution. Thus, the molecular structures of the transcription machinery are beginning to be elucidated. Much of this structural information is consistent with the models presented here.
All of these methods suffer from one serious shortcoming - the spatial resolution is relatively poor ( 10A) and Information about the catalytically interesting region of the particle, namely the surface structure, is then not available. One particular technique, high resolution electron microscopy, has for many years been slowly... [Pg.341]

Analytical electron microscopy (AEM) can use several signals from the specimen to analyze volumes of catalyst material about a thousand times smaller than conventional techniques. X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) is the most quantitative mode of chemical analyse in the AEM and is now also useful as a high resolution elemental mapping technique. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) vftiile not as well developed for quantitative analysis gives additional chemical information in the fine structure of the elemental absorption edges. EELS avoids the problem of spurious x-rays generated from areas of the spectrum remote from the analysis area. [Pg.370]

There are three potential methods by which a protein s three-dimensional structure can be visualized X-ray diffraction, NMR and electron microscopy. The latter method reveals structural information at low resolution, giving little or no atomic detail. It is used mainly to obtain the gross three-dimensional shape of very large (multi-polypeptide) proteins, or of protein aggregates such as the outer viral caspid. X-ray diffraction and NMR are the techniques most widely used to obtain high-resolution protein structural information, and details of both the principles and practice of these techniques may be sourced from selected references provided at the end of this chapter. The experimentally determined three-dimensional structures of some polypeptides are presented in Figure 2.8. [Pg.26]

Myelin in situ has a water content of about 40%. The dry mass of both CNS and PNS myelin is characterized by a high proportion of lipid (70-85%) and, consequently, a low proportion of protein (15-30%). By comparison, most biological membranes have a higher ratio of proteins to lipids. The currently accepted view of membrane structure is that of a lipid bilayer with integral membrane proteins embedded in the bilayer and other extrinsic proteins attached to one surface or the other by weaker linkages. Proteins and lipids are asymmetrically distributed in this bilayer, with only partial asymmetry of the lipids. The proposed molecular architecture of the layered membranes of compact myelin fits such a concept (Fig. 4-11). Models of compact myelin are based on data from electron microscopy, immunostaining, X-ray diffraction, surface probes studies, structural abnormalities in mutant mice, correlations between structure and composition in various species, and predictions of protein structure from sequencing information [4]. [Pg.56]

HIV is a typical member of the retrovirus family, in that it is an enveloped virus that carries RNA as its genetic information. The structure of HIV (Fig. 2) has been determined by electron microscopy. The viral membrane is acquired from the infected cell as the virus buds through the cell membrane. Inserted into the viral membrane are protein molecules coupled to carbohydrates (glycoproteins) which are essential for viral infectivity and probably also play a role in the... [Pg.196]

We have reconstructed the 3D structure of a complex quasicrystal approximant v-AlCrFe (P6 m, a = 40.687 and c = 12.546 A) (Zou et al, 2004). Due to the huge unit cell, it was necessary to combine crystallographic data from 13 projections to resolve the atoms. Electron microscopy images containing both amplitude and phase information were combined with amplitudes from electron diffraction patterns. 124 of the 129 unique atoms (1176 in the unit cell) were found in the remarkably clean calculated potential maps. This investigation demonstrates that inorganic crystals of any complexity can be solved by electron crystallography. [Pg.14]


See other pages where Electron microscopy structural information from is mentioned: [Pg.130]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.41]   


SEARCH



Cryo-electron microscopy structural information from

Electron microscopy structure

Information from

Structural information

Structural information structure

Structure information

© 2024 chempedia.info