Electron-accepting impurities

The proposed scenario is mainly based on the molecular approach, which considers conjugated polymer films as an ensemble of short (molecular) segments. The main point in the model is that the nature of the electronic state is molecular, i.e. described by localized wavefunctions and discrete energy levels. In spite of the success of this model, in which disorder plays a fundamental role, the description of the basic intrachain properties remains unsatisfactory. The nature of the lowest excited state in m-LPPP is still elusive. Extrinsic dissociation mechanisms (such as charge transfer at accepting impurities) are not clearly distinguished from intrinsic ones, and the question of intrachain versus interchain charge separation is not yet answered. 

Most reactive impurities are acids or bases in a broad sense. Here, an acid is a substance that has proton donor capacity, hydrogen bond donor capacity, electron pair acceptability, and electron acceptability. A base is a substance that has proton acceptability, hydrogen bond acceptability, electron pair donor capacity and electron donor capacity. Some reactive impurities have both acidic and basic properties. 

Extrinsic semiconductors are materials containing foreign atoms (FAs) or atomic impurity centres that can release electrons in the CB or trap an electron from the VB with energies smaller than Eg (from neutrality conservation, trapping an electron from the VB is equivalent to the release of a positive hole in the otherwise filled band). These centres can be inadvertently present in the material or introduced deliberately by doping, and, as intrinsic, the term extrinsic refers to the electrical conductivity of such materials. The electron-releasing entities are called donors and the electron-accepting ones acceptors. When a majority of the impurities or dopants in a material is of... 

Patel et al., 1974), but no effect is observed for neutral (Group IV) impurities in Ge or Si. Also, impurities that are electron-donors soften both Ge and Si at temperatures above about 450 °C whereas accepter type impurities soften Ge, but not Si. Another important point is that small impurity concentrations have little effect. The effects begin at concentrations of about 1018/cc. Since the atomic volume of Si is 20 A3, the critical ratio of impurity to Si atom is about 2 x 10 5. Therefore, the average lineal distance between impurity atoms is about one every 270 A. 

The usual picture here is that the foreign atom accepts an electron from an impurity level. The chemisorption is therefore depletive because the surface coverage depends on the concentration of impurity levels in the solid. The semiconductivity is, of course, reduced. We assume that the interaction problem is between the orbital on the foreign atom and the conduction band of the solid. The usual picture is then found in the A9 and AG C SL regions of Fig. 7, provided that the (P level lies below the impurity levels. An electron is lost from an impurity level for each foreign atom adsorbed, and if the (P level is anionic, the foreign atom is converted to an anion on the surface. 

With enantiomer analysis, however, a linear detector response is indispensible. Thus, for the correct determination of. say, 0.1 % of an enantiomeric impurity, linearity within a concentration range of at least three orders of magnitude is required. It is generally accepted that the flame ionization detector (FID) does fulfill this requirement, but it is recommended that the linear detector response is verified via dilution experiments31. In contrast, the linear response range of the electron capture detector is low, being only two to three orders of magnitude. 

Energy levels corresponding to electrons localized near the surface may also be present. These are termed surface states. For example, adsorbed ions are one type of surface state they may be of the form of donors, such as hydrogen, which yield electrons to the material, or in the form of acceptors, such as oxygen, which accept, or trap electrons from the material. In Fig. 1, surface traps of the acceptor type are shown, and it is indicated that there are two possible levels present. Other possibilities are impurity atoms at the surface, which are introduced in the preparation of the sample or diffuse from the interior during heat treatment, or nonstoichiometry of the surface layers of the compound. Surface... 

Dopants that donate electrons are termed donors or n-type dopants (e.g. phosphorus atoms in sihcon), since the negatively charged electrons become the majority carrier. By comparison, impurities that accept electrons (boron atoms in silicon), creating holes, ate termed acceptors or p-type dopants, since the positively charged holes become the... 

Extrinsic semiconductors ate those in which the carrier concentration, either holes or electrons, are controlled by intentionally added impurities called dopants. The dopants are termed shallow impurities because their energy levels lie within the band gap close to one or other of the bands. Because of thermal excitation, -type dopants (donors) are able to donate electrons to the conduction band and p-type dopants (acceptors) can accept electrons from the valence band, the result of which is equivalent to the introduction of holes in the valence band. Band gap widening/narrowingmay occur if the doping changes the band dispersion. At low temperamres, a special type of electrical transport known as impurity conduction proceeds. This topic is discussed in Section 7.3. 

As seen earlier, the steps used to purify iron involves carbonaceous material to remove the oxide-based impurities, through exothermic formation of CO and CO2. Hence, carbon will be pervasive in a variety of concentrations throughout all phases of iron and steels, present as an interstitial dopant within these lattices. Experimental evidence shows that carbon-doped iron polymorphs are indeed interstitial solid solutions. For instance, the carbon atoms in bcc ferrite are located only on empty face-centered positions. However, very few of these positions are occupied throughout the lattice, as the maximum solubility of carbon in a-Fe is only between 0.01 and 0.02 wt%. From a metallic-bonding standpoint, the addition of carbon in the lattice acts as an electron sink, that is able to accept some of the delocalized electron... 

---