Electrode processes irreversible reactions

Another group of reactions are the irreversible reactions. These are reactions for which the products are not immobilized on the metal surface. This is the case when gases are produced or when the products spread into the solution by diffusion processes. Irreversible reactions cause corrosion of electrode materials [8]. An example is ... 

Equations (11.6) or (11.10), which do not depend on the mode of electrode operation, remain valid for irreversible reactions. Substituting the value of Cg into the kinetic equation (6.10) for a cathodic process at significant values of polarization, we obtain, after transformations,... 

If sh 5 10 8 cm s 1 in dc polarography we arrive at a totally irreversible electrode process, where the backward reaction can be neglected we shall treat such a situation for a reduction process as the forward reaction. 

As ksh in this instance is very small, then according to the Butler-Volmer formulation (eqn. 3.5) the reaction rate of the forward reaction, K — 8,he "F(E 0)/flr, even at E = E°, is also very low. Hence Etppl. must be appreciably more negative to reach the half-wave situation than for a reversible electrode process. Therefore, in the case of irreversibility, the polarographic curve is not only shifted to a more negative potential, but also the value of its slope is considerably less than in the case of reversibility (see Fig. 3.21). In... 

This is the Tafel equation (5.2.32) or (5.2.36) for the rate of an irreversible electrode reaction in the absence of transport processes. Clearly, transport to and from the electrode has no effect on the rate of the overall process and on the current density. Under these conditions, the current density is termed the kinetic current density as it is controlled by the kinetics of the electrode process alone. 

In an irreversible reaction, the rate controlling process is usually a single electron transfer step with a rate determined by Equation 1.8. The corresponding po-larographic wave is then described by Equation 1.18 where kconv is the rate constant for electron transfer at the potential of the reference electrode. For an irreversible... 

The voltammetric data and other relevant kinetic and thermodynamic information are summarized in Table 2. While for X = H the initial ET controls the electrode rate, as indicated by the rather large p shift and peak width, the electrode process is, at low scan rates, under mixed ET-bond cleavage kinetic control (see Section 2) for X = Ph, and CN. Although the voltammetric reduction of these ethers is irreversible, in the case of the COMe derivative, some reversibility starts to show up at 500 Vs in fact, this reduction features a classical case of Nernstian ET followed by a first-order reaction. The reduction of the nitro derivative is reversible even at very low scan rate although, on a much longer timescale, this radical anion also decays. 

Electroanalytical chemists do deal with what they call irreversible reactions because they exist at and interfere with a transport-oriented approach. But the focus of interest in electroanalytical chemistry (rather reasonably), is on the usefulness of electrode processes to analysis and in this case one should aim for an electrode showing the highest ig and hence the least T] for a given current density. 

However, the peak current in AC polarography markedly depends on the reversibility of the electrode process, being very small for an irreversible process. We can apply this dependence to study the kinetics of the electrode reactions. 

Reversible, quasi-reversible and irreversible electrode processes have been studied at the RDE [266] as have coupled homogeneous reactions without [267] and with the effect of electrode kinetics [268], The theoretical results are very similar to those of a.c. polarography, being very phase-angle sensitive to coupled chemical reactions in the rotation speed range where convection can be neglected, the polarographic results may be directly applied [269]. 

The numerical values for ki. .. k4 vary with RG. For instance, for RG = 10, the following values provide the analytical function Jfei = 0.40472, k2 = 1.60185, k3 = 0.58819, and k4 = -2.37294 [12]. The analytical approximations for hindered diffusion provide a way to determine d from experimental approach curves. For this purpose, one can use an irreversible reaction at the UME (often 02 reduction). In such a case, Fig. 37.2, curve 1 is obtained irrespective of the nature of the sample. Besides the mediator flux from the solution bulk, there might be a heterogeneous reaction at the sample surface during which the UME-generated species O is recycled to the mediator R. The regeneration process of the mediator might be (i) an electrochemical reaction (if the sample is an electrode itself) [9], (ii) an oxidation of the sample surface (if the sample is an insulator or semiconductor) [14], or (iii) the consumption of O as an electron acceptor in a reaction catalyzed by enzymes or other catalysts immobilized at the sample surface [15]. All these processes will increase (t above the values in curve 1 of Fig. 37.2. How much iT increases, depends on the kinetics of the reaction at the sample. If the reaction of the sample occurs with a rate that is controlled by the diffusion of O towards the sample, Fig. 37.2, curve 2 is recorded. If the sample is an electrode itself, such a curve is experimentally obtained if the sample potential... 

The criterion discussed above is based on the dependence of the surface concentration of the oxidized species with the reversibility degree of the electrode process. So, for a totally irreversible process, the rate of depletion of the surface concentration Cq is much smaller than the mass transport rate process, and therefore, at the formal potential its value should be coincident with the bulk concentration (co(2,°)/coi — l)- In contrast- for reversible electrode reactions, cb(x°)/co = 0.5 (see Eq. (2.20) of Sect. 2.2 for = 0 and y = 1). In order to verify this behavior, the variation of the surface concentration of species O at the formal potential calculated as a function of has been plotted in Fig. 3.5b. From this figure, it can be deduced that at the irreversible limit (i.e., = 0.17),... 

The theoretical study of other electrode processes as a reduction followed by a dimerization of the reduced form or a second-order catalytic mechanism (when the concentration of species Z in scheme (3.IXa, 3.IXb) is not too high) requires the direct use of numerical procedures to obtain their voltammetric responses, although approximate solutions for a second-order catalytic mechanism have been given [83-85]. An approximate analytical expression for the normalized limiting current of this last mechanism with an irreversible chemical reaction is obtained in reference [86] for spherical microelectrodes, and is given by... 

For an electrode process followed up by an irreversible homogeneous chemical reaction (K = 0, Fig. 4.31b), the peak currents are independent of the chemical kinetics whereas the peak potential takes more positive values as xi increases because the chemical reaction facilitates the reduction process by removal of species B. In all cases plotted in this figure, the value of the crossing potential can be evaluated with good accuracy from Eq. (4.255) (error smaller than 3 mV for X2 > 102). With respect to the E mechanism of species A, in the EC response both peak currents are smaller, and this effect is especially noticeable in the minimum which is more affected by the follow-up reaction. 

In these electrode processes, the use of macroelectrodes is recommended when the homogeneous kinetics is slow in order to achieve a commitment between the diffusive and chemical rates. When the chemical kinetics is very fast with respect to the mass transport and macroelectrodes are employed, the electrochemical response is insensitive to the homogeneous kinetics of the chemical reactions—except for first-order catalytic reactions and irreversible chemical reactions follow up the electron transfer—because the reaction layer becomes negligible compared with the diffusion layer. Under the above conditions, the equilibria behave as fully labile and it can be supposed that they are maintained at any point in the solution at any time and at any applied potential pulse. This means an independent of time (stationary) response cannot be obtained at planar electrodes except in the case of a first-order catalytic mechanism. Under these conditions, the use of microelectrodes is recommended to determine large rate constants. However, there is a range of microelectrode radii with which a kinetic-dependent stationary response is obtained beyond the upper limit, a transient response is recorded, whereas beyond the lower limit, the steady-state response is insensitive to the chemical kinetics because the kinetic contribution is masked by the diffusion mass transport. In the case of spherical microelectrodes, the lower limit corresponds to the situation where the reaction layer thickness does not exceed 80 % of the diffusion layer thickness. 

This electrode process (scheme (7.VII)), has been studied in SWV by considering that the homogeneous chemical reaction is fully irreversible and without consideration of the reaction (7.VIII) (see also Sect. 3.4.8 for more details) [63-65]. 

The oxidation potentials 170 ——- 777 of a large number of aromatic hydrocarbons, amines, phenols,heterocycles and olefins are tabulated I0,10a>25-48 65,525-528) an(j nee(j not repeated here. Such potentials have been successfully correlated with HMO-parameters 525 530>538) ie in oxidations with the energy of the highest filled MO (HFMO).Adams 25) and Peover 65) have discussed some precaution to which attention should be paid in such correlations, e.g., shifts in potentials due to the irreversibility of the electrode process or due to fast follow-up reactions. 

Cathodic limits on mercury. In aqueous or other protic solvents the reduction of hydronium ion or solvent generally will limit the negative potential range. The nature of some electrode reactions at highly negative potentials on mercury has been examined.63 For example, K(OH2) and Na(OH2)4 ions are reduced reversibly in aqueous solutions, but the process is accompanied by a parallel irreversible reaction due to an amalgam dissolution reaction of the alkali metal with water that produces hydrogen. 

Whereas for reversible reactions only thermodynamic and mass-transport parameters can be determined, for quasi-reversible and irreversible reactions both kinetic and thermodynamic parameters can be measured. It should also be noted that the electrode material can affect the kinetics of electrode processes. 

The kinetics is called irreversible in electrochemistry when the charge-transfer step is very sluggish, i.e., the standard rate constant (ks) and - exchange current density (j0) are very small. In this case the anodic and cathodic reactions are never simultaneously significant. In order to observe any current, the charge-transfer reaction has to be strongly activated either in cathodic or in anodic direction by application of -> overpotential. When the electrode process is neither very facile nor very sluggish we speak of quasireversible behavior. 

Surface redox reactions — or surface -> electrode reactions, are reactions in which both components of the -> redox couple are immobilized on the electrode surface in a form of a -> monolayer. Immobilization can be achieved by means of irreversible -> adsorption, covalent bonding, self-assembling (- self-assembled mono-layers), adhesion, by Langmuir-Blodgett technique (- Langmuir-Blodgett films), etc. [i]. In some cases, the electrode surface is the electroactive reactant as well as the product of the electrode reaction is immobilized on the electrode surface, e.g., oxidation of a gold, platinum, or aluminum electrode to form metal oxide. This type of electrode processes can be also considered as surface electrode reactions. Voltammetric response of a surface redox reaction differs markedly from that of a dissolved... 

If a resistor is added in series with the parallel RC circuit, the overall circuit becomes the well-known Randles cell, as shown in Figure 4.11a. This is a model representing a polarizable electrode (or an irreversible electrode process), based on the assumptions that a diffusion limitation does not exist, and that a simple single-step electrochemical reaction takes place on the electrode surface. Thus, the Faradaic impedance can be simplified to a resistance, called the charge-transfer resistance. The single-step electrochemical reaction is described as... 

The fact that US influences the mechanism of chemical reactions via the action of highly reactive radicals such as OH- and H- formed during solvent sonolysis is well known (see Chapter 7). Solvents sensitive to thermolysis or sonolysis (e.g. dimethylformamide [158], dimethylsulphoxide [159]) decompose slowly in the presence of intense US. Thus, radical species formed by cavitation are highly reactive and may participate as activators or enhancers in the electrode process [160]. In fast, qt/asr-reversible or irreversible systems, however, the only effect of US is to enhance mass transport without any direct effect on the rate of simple electron transfer processes. 

The above analysis also shows that for almost all applications of fast CV employing V > 1 kV s , the quasi-reversible or irreversible nature of heterogeneous electron transfer reactions must be considered. In particular, this becomes important when fast CV is used in a kinetic analysis of fast homogeneous follow-up reactions. The extraction of the relevant rate constants is complicated by the mixed kinetic control of the electrode process and the chemical reaction. As a result, the number of parameters involved in the fitting procedures is increased considerably and with it the possibility of introducing errors. 

The second wave appears as a peak at scan rates of at least 10 mV s. This process passivates the electrode and the reaction becomes irreversible. 

The reactive radical ions [56] undergo irreversible chemical follow-up reactions (ec mechanism). The whole electrode process becomes irreversible. In Section 2 it is shown that this is true at least for the formation of one or two covalent bonds containing at least one C atom, e.g., C-C or C-X, X = H, O, N, etc. 

The shape of the polarographic wave is further influenced by the nature of the electrode process occurring at the drop surface. Polarographic waves may be reversible, irreversible, or quasireversible. The overall electrode process comprises the diffusion, electron transfer, and electrochemical reaction steps. 

The reversibility of the electron transfer reaction may be tested via this equation, which predicts that a plot of E versus log[(id — i)/i] results in a straight line with the slope 0.0591/nV (at T = 298 K) for a reversible redox system. Slopes smaller than 0.059l/nV are observed when the electrode process is quasi-reversible or irreversible. In the latter case, E and i are related through Eq. (79) [238,241]. 

---