Electrochemical oxidation constant current method

Coulometric methods of analysis are based on an exhaustive electrolysis of the analyte. By exhaustive we mean that the analyte is quantitatively oxidized or reduced at the working electrode or reacts quantitatively with a reagent generated at the working electrode. There are two forms of coulometry controlled-potential coulometry, in which a constant potential is applied to the electrochemical cell, and controlled-current coulometry, in which a constant current is passed through the electrochemical cell. 

Should any iron(II) reach the anode, it also would be oxidized and thus not require the chemical reaction of Eq. (4.13) to bring about oxidation, but this would not in any way cause an error in the titration. This method is equivalent to the constant-rate addition of titrants from a burette. However, in place of a burette the titrant is electrochemically generated in the solution at a constant rate that is directly proportional to the constant current. For accurate results to be obtained the electrode reaction must occur with 100% current efficiency (i.e., without any side reactions that involve solvent or other materials that would not be effective in the secondary reaction). In the method of coulometric titrations the material that chemically reacts with the sample system is referred to as an electrochemical intermediate [the cerium(III)/cerium(IV) couple is the electrochemical intermediate for the titration of iron(II)]. Because one faraday of electrolysis current is equivalent to one gram-equivalent (g-equiv) of titrant, the coulometric titration method is extremely sensitive relative to conventional titration procedures. This becomes obvious when it is recognized that there are 96,485 coulombs (C) per faraday. Thus, 1 mA of current flowing for 1 second represents approximately 10-8 g-equiv of titrant. 

This mixture forms a monolayer at the air-water interface. This monolayer is then transferred on a substrate (glass, quartz, CaF2) by a horizontal lifting method. The neutral films so obtained are oxidized, that is, doped , in situ with gaseous bromine or by galvanostatic electrochemical oxidation at constant current (261). The RT conductivity of the films is 30 S cm 1, and they behave as a metal down to 200 K, below which temperature the behavior remains quasimetallic. However, after aging in vacuum, the film behaves like a semiconductor from RT down to 10 K. 

Of physiologically active substances isolated from marine sources, the pyrroloimino-quinone alkaloids family exhibits antitumor activities derived from the unique highly-fused structure. The first synthesis of discorhabdin C (127) was performed by means of an electrochemical method as a key step . The key substrate 128, efficiently prepared starting from 4,4-dimethoxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde, was submitted to constant current electrolysis (3 mA 4-1.2-1.8 V vi. SCE) in anhydrous MeCN to give rise to discorhabdin C in 24% yield, together with a minor compound 129 (6%) (Scheme 24). After a while, discohabdin C was also synthesized by using PhI(OCOCF3)2-promoted oxidation as a key step. ... 

The counterion should also be stable both chemically and electrochemically otherwise, breakdown products may interfere in the polymerization process. If it is electroactive at potentials lower than the monomer oxidation potential, it can be incorporated using potentiostatic methods but not with constant-current techniques because the counterion will be preferentially oxidized. 

Various electrochemical methods have been applied for the analysis of nucleic acids, including DPP and DPV, cyclic voltammetry, a.c. voltammetry, and constant current chronopotentiometry, which are particularly useful. Guanine (G) and adenine (A) residues in DNA and RNA molecules are oxidized at carbon electrodes however, their voltammetric peaks are poorly developed, providing insufficient sensitivity in... 

Electrochemical methods for NO determination offer several features that are not available with spectroscopic approaches. Perhaps the most important is the capability of microelectrodes to directly measure NO in single cells in situ, in close proximity to the source of NO generation. Figure 2 shows sensors that have been developed for the electrochemical measurement of NO. One is based on the electrochemical oxidation of NO on a platinum electrode (the classical Clark probe for detection of oxygen) and operates in the amperometric mode [17]. The other is based on the electrochemical oxidation of NO on conductive polymeric porphyrin (porphyrinic sensor) [24]. The Clark probe uses a platinum wire as a working electrode (anode) and a silver wire serves as the counterelectrode (cathode). The electrodes are mounted in a capillary tube filled with a sodium chlo-ride/hydrochloric acid solution separated from the analyte by a gas-permeable membrane. A constant potential of 0.9 V is applied, and direct current (analytical signal) is measured from the electrochemical oxidation of NO on the platinum anode. In the porphyrinic sensor, NO is catalytically oxidized on a polymeric metalloporphyrin... 

In order to screen mutants with improved direct electron transfer, it is necessary to use an electrochemical screening system. Currently, only a few electrochemical screening methods were described in literature such as the system developed by the Bartlett group used to screen NADH electro-oxidation. This system uses a multichannel potentiostat with sixty electrodes to screen zinc(n) or ruthenium(ii) complexes bearing the redox phenidione as a mediator for NADH oxidation. It allows the complete evaluation of the electrochemical kinetic constants of the mediators and the immobilization procedure. Unfortunately, this system could only be used with a single electrolyte solution for all the electrodes (e.g., when a single reaction condition or enzyme is assayed), and it requires mL-scale reaction volumes. Recently, another system was described which makes it possible to screen bioelectrocatalytic reactions on 96 independent electrodes screen-printed onto a printed-circuit-board. It showed the possibility to screen direct or mediated electron transfer between oxidoreductases and electrode by intermittent pulse amperometry at the pL-scale (Fig. 6). The direct electron transfer assay was validated with laccase and unmodified electrodes.As an example of the mediated electron transfer assay, the 96 carbon electrodes were modified by phenazines to sereen libraries of a formate dehydrogenase obtained by directed evolution. ... 

To determine the kinetic parameters of electrochemical oxidation reactions stationary polarization curves are obtained by gal-vanostatic and potentiostatic methods. As shown by experience, the establishment of constant potential in galvanostatic measurements and constant current in potentiostatic measurements in most cases requires large intervals of time. Here not only the value of the potentials and currents but also the slopes of the polarization curves before the establishment of a stationary state are functions of the time of measurement. 

The largest division of interfacial electrochemical methods is the group of dynamic methods, in which current flows and concentrations change as the result of a redox reaction. Dynamic methods are further subdivided by whether we choose to control the current or the potential. In controlled-current coulometry, which is covered in Section IIC, we completely oxidize or reduce the analyte by passing a fixed current through the analytical solution. Controlled-potential methods are subdivided further into controlled-potential coulometry and amperometry, in which a constant potential is applied during the analysis, and voltammetry, in which the potential is systematically varied. Controlled-potential coulometry is discussed in Section IIC, and amperometry and voltammetry are discussed in Section IID. 

---