Ecological effects measurement

PCDDs and PCDEs, together with coplanar PCBs, can express Ah-receptor-mediated toxicity. TCDD (dioxin) is used as a reference compound in the determination of TEFs, which can be used to estimate TEQs (toxic equivalents) for residues of PHAHs found in wildlife samples. Biomarker assays for Ah-receptor-mediated toxicity have been based on the induction of P450 lAl. TEQs measured in field samples have sometimes been related to toxic effects upon individuals and associated ecological effects (e.g., reproductive success). 

The PAF indicates the likelihood that adverse ecological effects will occur as a result of TBT exposure in a particular area. This value can be interpreted as the probability that a randomly selected exposure concentration will exceed species sensitivity. The probabilistic risk assessment was performed on the clustered data for harbours and for open waters, as well as for each harbour and open water separately. Only water systems for which exposure concentrations were measured at two or more locations were selected (all open waters and 19 out of 30 harbours). 

Ratte, H.T., Baird, D.J., Nahholz, J.V. and Sanderson, H. (2008) Extrapolation of effects measures across levels of biological organization in ecological risk assessment, in Extrapolation Practice for Ecotoxicological Effect Characterization of Chemicals, (eds K.R. Solomon, T.C.M. Brock, D. de Zwart, S.D. Dyer, L. Posfhuma, S.M. Richards, H. Sanderson, P.K. Sibley and P.J. van den Brink), CRC Press/Taylor and Francis/SETAC, Pensacola, FL,... 

Found persistence of P. cepacia AC1100 in microcosms with and without addition of 2,4,5-T. Measured ecological effects on soil by GEM versus nonrecombinant parent uninoculated control. Microcosms supplemented with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate, glucose, or unamended. 

The NADP analyzes the constituents important in precipitation chemistry, including those affecting rainfall acidity and those that may have ecological effects. The Netwoik measures sulfate, nitrate, hydrogen ion (measure of acidity), ammonia, chloride, and base cations (calcium, magnesium. potassium). To ensure comparability of results, laboratory analyses for all samples are conducted by the NADP s Central Analytical Lab at the Illinois State Water Survey, A new subnetwork of the NADP, the Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) measures mercury in precipitation. 

Figure 28.2 An example of a conceptual model for a watershed. Human activities, shown at the top of the diagram, result in various stressors that induce ecological effects. Assessment end points and related measures that are associated with these effects are shown at the bottom of the diagram.

What are the appropriate output measures of ecosystem component models What are the ecological effects of climate change that policy analysts use to determine the importance of ecosystem change ... 

Metal speciation procedures, which have been verified under controlled laboratory conditions and evaluated by means of bioassays, will require further verification in order to determine their ecological effects. For example, how does the response of the bioassay test species to a toxic metal fraction relate to the toxicity to larger organisms such as fish in the natural environment Bioaccumulation of metals in populations has been very difficult to relate to metal speciation measurements. There is a challenge for analytical chemists to develop metal speciation procedures that are relevant to ecotoxicology (Morrison and Wei, 1991). 

A Extrapolation of Effects Measures across Levels of Biological Organization in Ecological Risk Assessment... 

Following construction of the conceptual model, problem formulation continues by developing a plan to implement the conceptual model of the ERA. The resulting analysis plan further characterizes the stressors, identifies specific ecological effects of concern, and identifies applicable data, as well as measures or models that can be used to quantitatively relate the stressors to the expected ecological effects. 

Sources of data that might be used in the construction of stressor-response functions include the results of toxicity tests (lethal, chronic) performed under controlled laboratory conditions, direct measures of exposure and response in controlled field experiments, and the application of statistical relationships that estimate the biological effects of chemicals based on physical or chemical properties of specific toxicants. The order of preference among these sources of data lists field observations as the most valuable, followed by laboratory toxicity tests, and finally by the use of empirical relationships. In the absence of directly relevant data, the development of stressor-response functions may require the use of extrapolations among similar stressors or ecological effects for which data are available. For example, effects might have to be extrapolated from the available test species to an untested species of concern in an ERA. Similarly, toxicity data might be available only for a chemical similar to the specific chemical stressor of concern in an ERA, and thereby require an extrapolation from one chemical to another to perform the assessment. 

Measurement of Ecological Effects at Various Levels of Biological Organization... 

Methods and measurements used in biomonitoring for ecological effects. A number of methods are used both in a laboratory situation and in the field to attempt to classify the effects of xeno-biotics upon ecological systems. Toxicity tests can be used to examine effects at several levels of biological organization and can be performed with species introduced as monitors for a particular environment. 

The characterization of ecological effects is perhaps the most critical aspect of the risk assessment process. Several levels of confidence exist in our ability to measure the relationship between dose and effect. Toxicity measured under set conditions in a laboratory can be made with a great deal of accuracy. Unfortunately, as the system becomes more realistic and includes multiple species and additional routes of exposure, even the ability to measure effects is decreased. 

The combining of exposure analysis with ecological effects data results in a stressor-response profile. This profile is an attempt to match ecosystem impacts at the levels of the stressor concentration under study. Relationships between the xenobiotic and the measurement endpoint are evaluated with a consideration of how this interaction affects the assessment endpoint. Rarely is this process straightforward. Often some model is used to specifically state the relationship between the measurement and assessment endpoint. When this relationship is not specifically stated it is then left to professional judgment. 

The second phase of the framework is termed analysis and consists of two activities, characterization of exposure and characterization of ecological effects. The purpose of characterization of exposure is to predict or measure the spatial and temporal distribution of a stressor and its co-occurrence or contact with the ecological components of concern, while the purpose of characterization of ecological effects is to identify and quantify the adverse effects elicited by a stressor and, to the extent possible, to evaluate cause-and-effect relationships. 

The data used in characterization of ecological effects are analyzed to quantify the stressor-response relationship and to evaluate the evidence for causality. A variety of techniques may be used, including statistical methods and mathematical modeling. In some cases, additional analyses to relate the measurement endpoint to the assessment endpoint may be necessary. 

Many chemical component-s present in such aerosols are relatively stable they can be measured long after (days, week.s, or more) the aero.sol has been collected on a filter or impactor plate, for example. Short-lived reactive and/or volatile species such as peroxides and aldehydes are not usually determined. This may make it difficult to evaluate the health and ecological effects of aerosols because chemically reactive chemical species tend to be the most active biochemically. The chemical components present in the particles collected on a filter or impactor plate may react with each other when they are in close proximity. Particle deposits in filters or on surfaces may also react with molecular components of the gases flowing over them. Chemical reactions between the gas and aerosol may not affect mea.surement.s of metallic elements but may modify chemical speciation (compound form) on the collector surface. All of these factors must be taken into account in selecting sampling and measurement methods for aerosol chemical properties. 

---