Dynamic Wilhelmy method

Single fiber This is a dynamic Wilhelmy method which is... 

The sessile drop method has several drawbacks. Several days elapse between each displacement, and total test times exceeding one month are not uncommon. It can be difficult to determine that the interface has actually advanced across the face of the crystal. Displacement frequency and distance are variable and dependent upon the operator. Tests are conducted on pure mineral surfaces, usually quartz, which does not adequately model the heterogeneous rock surfaces in reservoirs. There is a need for a simple technique that gives reproducible data and can be used to characterize various mineral surfaces. The dynamic Wilhelmy plate technique has such a potential. This paper discusses the dynamic Wilhelmy plate apparatus used to study wetting properties of liquid/liquid/solid systems important to the oil industry. 

Provides measuring techniques of contact angle, surface tension, interfacial tension, and bubble pressure. Suitable methods for both static and dynamic inteifacial tension of liquids include du Nous ring, Wilhelmy plate, spinning drop, pendant drop, bubble pressure, and drop volume techniques. Methods for solids include sessile drop, dynamic Wilhelmy, single fiber, and powder contact angle techniques. 

Figure 26.20 A correlation between the average of dynamic advancing and receding contact angles from the Wilhelmy method and static advancing contact angles from the sessile droplet method for untreated, TMS and TMS + O2 treated pol5rmers follows the relationship given by cos 6s = (cos 0u, .,i + cos 0D,a,i)/2.

The surface tension measurement techniques can be divided into the following three categories (i) Force Methods, which include the truly static methods of the capillary rise and Wilhelmy plate methods, as well as the dynamic detachment methods of the Du Nouy ring and drop weight, (ii) Shape Methods, which include the pendant or sessile drop or bubble, as well as the spinning drop methods, and (iii) Pressure Methods, which are represented by the maximum bubble pressure method. These techniques are summarized in the following sections of this chapter. 

The Wilhelmy method can also be used to investigate dynamic wetting processes by recording the formation of the liquid lamella in time or by immersing and withdrawing the polymer film into and from the liquid at constant rate. Time-dependent measurements are also useful for examining cases in which liquid is taken up after the polymer film has been wetted or, conversely, in which the liquid dissolves film components such as emulsifiers. 

Dynamic surface tension has also been measured by quasielastic light scattering (QELS) from interfacial capillary waves [30]. It was shown that QELS gives the same result for the surface tension as the traditional Wilhelmy plate method down to the molecular area of 70 A. QELS has recently utilized in the study of adsorption dynamics of phospholipids on water-1,2-DCE, water-nitrobenzene and water-tetrachloromethane interfaces [31]. This technique is still in its infancy in liquid-liquid systems and its true power is to be shown in the near future. 

The Wilhelmy hanging plate method (13) has been used for many years to measure interfacial and surface tensions, but with the advent of computer data collection and computer control of dynamic test conditions, its utility has been greatly increased. The dynamic version of the Wilhelmy plate device, in which the liquid phases are in motion relative to a solid phase, has been used in several surface chemistry studies not directly related to the oil industry (14- 16). Fleureau and Dupeyrat (17) have used this technique to study the effects of an electric field on the formation of surfactants at oil/water/rock interfaces. The work presented here is concerned with reservoir wettability. 

The Wilhelmy plate method provides an extremely simple approach that, unlike the ring detachment method, permits the measurement of continuously varying or dynamic surface tensions. If a thin plate (e.g., a microscope slide, a strip of platinum foil, or even a slip of filter paper) is attached to a microbalance and suspended so that its lower edge is just immersed in a liquid, the measured apparent weight Wj, is related to the actual weight of the plate Wp and the surface tension y by the following simple equation ... 

This unit will introduce two fundamental protocols—the Wilhelmy plate method (see Basic Protocol 1 and Alternate Protocol 1) and the du Noiiy ring method (see Alternate Protocol 2)—that can be used to determine static interfacial tension (Dukhin et al., 1995). Since the two methods use the same experimental setup, they will be discussed together. Two advanced protocols that have the capability to determine dynamic interfacial tension—the drop volume technique (see Basic Protocol 2) and the drop shape method (see Alternate Protocol 3)—will also be presented. The basic principles of each of these techniques will be briefly outlined in the Background Information. Critical Parameters as well as Time Considerations for the different tests will be discussed. References and Internet Resources are listed to provide a more in-depth understanding of each of these techniques and allow the reader to contact commercial vendors to obtain information about costs and availability of surface science instrumentation. 

The main advantage of the static methods is cost. The equipment needed to conduct the dynamic measurements is approximately five times as expensive as the equipment required for static measurements (- 25,000 for a drop shape and drop volume analyzer versus - 5,000 for du Noiiy and Wilhelmy instruments). This is due to the additional capability of the former instruments to determine not only interfacial tension values but also the corresponding age of the interface. For more information on equipment, costs, and suppliers, see Internet Resources. 

The Wilhelmy plate and du Noiiy ring methods provide a single value for surface tension of a given surfactant at a given concentration. Examples are provided in unitd3.5 (see Figure D3.5.5). Examples of dynamic surface tension values are also provided in unitd3.5. 

It is very well known that the nature of the monolayer partially depends on the strength of interfacial interactions with substrate molecules and that of polymer in-tersegmental interactions. And it is normal to expect that the viscoelastic properties of polymer monolayer are also dependent on these factors. The static and dynamic properties of several different polymer monolayers at the air - water interface have been examined with the surface quasi-elastic Light Scattering technique combined with the static Wilhelmy plate method [101]. 

A number of methods are available for the measurement of surface and interfacial tension of liquid systems. Surface tension of liquids is determined by static and dynamic surface tension methods. Static surface tension characterises the surface tension of the liquid in equilibrium and the commonly used measurement methods are Du Notiy ring, Wilhelmy plate, spinning drop and pendant drop. Dynamic surface tension determines the surface tension as a function of time and the bubble pressure method is the most common method used for its determination. 

For measurement of interfacial tension see also -> Wilhelmy plate (slide) method, -> drop weight method, -> ring method. There are also a number of other static and dynamic methods for the determination the interfacial tension [viii]. 

Similar to static contact angles from the sessile droplet method, Wilhelmy dynamic contact angles are an excellent indication of the change in surface characteristics due to surface modification techniques such as plasma polymerization coating. The cosine of dynamic advancing contact angles from the first immersion, cos 0D,a,i of untreated, TMS-treated, and (TMS-I-02)-treated conventional... 

The sessile droplet contact angle measurement is a simple and accurate method to obtain information pertinent to the surface energy of a sample. The Wilhelmy balance method, on the other hand, is a very useful method to investigate the surface dynamic aspect of a sample, which will be described in the following sections. The instability of some of plasma-treated polymer surface observed by the Wilhelmy balance method is also described in Chapter 30. 

---