Driving force factor

Another possibility is the Tucker3 model where a decomposition of the array into sets of scores and loadings is performed that should describe the data in a more condensed form than the original data array. For the sake of simplicity we will describe the model for a three-way array, but it is easy to extend the idea to multiway data. Let xijk denote an element of a three-way array X of dimension I/J/K. Basic assumption is that the data are influenced by a relatively small set of driving forces (factors). Then the Tucker3 model is defined as... 

The same example also shows that the driving force factor is not the sole one to come into play. + nu- known for iron(i) and iron(o)... 

The barrier factor, i.e. the expression before the bracket, decreases exponentially with increasing stem length l and the driving force factor (the term in brackets) increases with l (see Fig. 6). The product G has a maximum at an l value which is considered as the kinetically determined lamellar crystal thickness in polydisperse polymers. G becomes positive at the minimum stable fold length /mjn ... 

The second factor in eq 9 ( driving force factor ) increases with increasing 7, and for 1 > 7mln = 2oj (A0), it is positive. At small and moderate AT, the first factor ( barrier factor ) decreases with increasing 7. Hence 5(7) has a maximum. The 7-value of the maximum, as well as the average value of 7, is somewhat larger than 7min. Thus,... 

Segment Number of Conversions Most Common Driving Force Second Most Common Driving Force Factors Against... 

Before pursuing the diffusion process any further, let us examine the diffusion coefficient itself in greater detail. Specifically, we seek a relationship between D and the friction factor of the solute. In general, an increment of energy is associated with a force and an increment of distance. In the present context the driving force behind diffusion (subscript diff) is associated with an increment in the chemical potential of the solute and an increment in distance dx ... 

The scale-up of filtration centrifuges is usually done on an area basis, based on small-scale tests. Buchner funnel-type tests are not of much value here because the driving force for filtration is not only due to the static head but also due to the centrifugal forces on the Hquid in the cake. A test procedure has been described with a specially designed filter beaker to measure the intrinsic permeabiHty of the cake (7). The best test is, of course, with a small-scale model, using the actual suspension. Many manufacturers offer small laboratory models for such tests. The scale-up is most reHable if the basket diameter does not increase by a factor of more than 2.5 from the small scale. 

The potential of the reaction is given as = (cathodic — anodic reaction) = 0.337 — (—0.440) = +0.777 V. The positive value of the standard cell potential indicates that the reaction is spontaneous as written (see Electrochemical processing). In other words, at thermodynamic equihbrium the concentration of copper ion in the solution is very small. The standard cell potentials are, of course, only guides to be used in practice, as rarely are conditions sufftciendy controlled to be called standard. Other factors may alter the driving force of the reaction, eg, cementation using aluminum metal is usually quite anomalous. Aluminum tends to form a relatively inert oxide coating that can reduce actual cell potential. 

Likewise, the microscopic heat-transfer term takes accepted empirical correlations for pure-component pool boiling and adds corrections for mass-transfer and convection effects on the driving forces present in pool boiling. In addition to dependence on the usual physical properties, the extent of superheat, the saturation pressure change related to the superheat, and a suppression factor relating mixture behavior to equivalent pure-component heat-transfer coefficients are correlating functions. 

Thus when an electric field is appHed to a soHd material the mobile charge carriers are accelerated to an average drift velocity v, which, under steady-state conditions, is proportional to the field strength. The proportionality factor is defined as the mobility, = v/E. An absolute mobility defined as the velocity pet unit driving force acting on the particle, is given as ... 

Figure 7 shows these results schematically for both twist and tilt crack deflections. Thus, for the stress intensity factor required to drive a crack at a tilt or twist angle, the appHed driving force must be increased over and above that required to propagate the crack under pure mode 1 loading conditions. Twist deflection out of plane is a more effective toughening mechanism than a simple tilt deflection out of plane. 

The heating effect is the limiting factor for all electrophoretic separations. When heat is dissipated rapidly, as in capillary electrophoresis, rapid, high resolution separations are possible. For electrophoretic separations the higher the separating driving force, ie, the electric field strength, the better the resolution. This means that if a way to separate faster can be found, it should also be a more effective separation. This is the opposite of most other separation techniques. 

Since the infinite dilution values D°g and Dba. re generally unequal, even a thermodynamically ideal solution hke Ya = Ys = 1 will exhibit concentration dependence of the diffusivity. In addition, nonideal solutions require a thermodynamic correction factor to retain the true driving force for molecular diffusion, or the gradient of the chemical potential rather than the composition gradient. That correction factor is ... 

Alternate driving force approximations, item 2B in Table 16-12, for solid diffusion, and item 3B in Table 16-12, for pore diffusion, provide somewhat more accurate results in constant pattern packed-bed calculations with pore or solid diffusion controlling for constant separation factor systems. 

These methods of classification are not mutually exclusive. Thus filters usually are divided first into the two groups of cake and clarifying equipment, then into groups of machines using the same land of driving force, then further into batch and continuous classes. This is the scheme of classification underlying the discussion of filters of this subsection. Within it, the other aspects of operating cycle, the nature of the sohds, and additional factors (e.g., types and classification of filter media) will be treated explicitly or implicitly. 

---