Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Driving force separability

Process Driving force Separation size range Examples of materials separated... [Pg.354]

The factors to consider in the selection of crossflow filtration include the flow configuration, tangential linear velocity, transmembrane pressure drop (driving force), separation characteristics of the membrane (permeability and pore size), size of particulates relative to the membrane pore dimensions, low protein-binding ability, and hydrodynamic conditions within the flow module. Again, since particle-particle and particle-membrane interactions are key, broth conditioning (ionic strength, pH, etc.) may be necessary to optimize performance. [Pg.76]

Separation process Driving force Separation mechanism Species passed Membrane structure Application... [Pg.111]

The relative transfer of two solutes across a dialysis membrane is a function of bod) their diffusivitics in die membrane and their driving forces. Separations will be efficient only for species that differ significantly in diffusion coefficient. Since diffusion coefficients are a relatively weak function of molecular size. [Pg.954]

Here p is the chemical potential just as the pressure is a mechanical potential and the temperature Jis a thennal potential. A difference in chemical potential Ap is a driving force that results in the transfer of molecules tlnough a penneable wall, just as a pressure difference Ap results in a change in position of a movable wall and a temperaPire difference AT produces a transfer of energy in the fonn of heat across a diathennic wall. Similarly equilibrium between two systems separated by a penneable wall must require equality of tire chemical potential on the two sides. For a multicomponent system, the obvious extension of equation (A2.1.22) can be written... [Pg.342]

The simple box-type mixer—settler (113) has been used extensively in the UK for the separation and purification of uranium and plutonium (114). In this type of extractor, interstage flow is handled through a partitioned box constmction. Interstage pumping is not needed because the driving force is provided by the density difference between solutions in successive stages (see Plutoniumand plutonium compounds Uraniumand uranium compounds). [Pg.74]

There are, in principle, two driving forces for obtaining the compositional separation, namely the temperature and deposition geometry. [Pg.181]

Nonporous Dense Membranes. Nonporous, dense membranes consist of a dense film through which permeants are transported by diffusion under the driving force of a pressure, concentration, or electrical potential gradient. The separation of various components of a solution is related directiy to their relative transport rate within the membrane, which is determined by their diffusivity and solubiUty ia the membrane material. An important property of nonporous, dense membranes is that even permeants of similar size may be separated when their concentration ia the membrane material (ie, their solubiUty) differs significantly. Most gas separation, pervaporation, and reverse osmosis membranes use dense membranes to perform the separation. However, these membranes usually have an asymmetric stmcture to improve the flux. [Pg.61]

The fourth fully developed membrane process is electrodialysis, in which charged membranes are used to separate ions from aqueous solutions under the driving force of an electrical potential difference. The process utilizes an electrodialysis stack, built on the plate-and-frame principle, containing several hundred individual cells formed by a pair of anion- and cation-exchange membranes. The principal current appHcation of electrodialysis is the desalting of brackish groundwater. However, industrial use of the process in the food industry, for example to deionize cheese whey, is growing, as is its use in poUution-control appHcations. [Pg.76]

Gas Separation. During the 1980s, gas separation using membranes became a commercially important process the size of this appHcation is stiH increasing rapidly. In gas separation, one of the components of the feed permeates a permselective membrane at a much higher rate than the others. The driving force is the pressure difference between the pressurized feed gas and the lower pressure permeate. [Pg.82]

The high T] values above conflict with the common behef that distillation is always inherendy inefficient. This behef arises mainly because past distillation practices utilized such high driving forces for pressure drop, tedux ratio, and temperature differentials in teboilets and condensers. A teal example utilizing an ethane—ethylene sphtter follows, in which the relative number for the theoretical work of separation is 1.0, and that for the net work potential used before considering driving forces is 1.4. [Pg.84]

The need for low levels of 3-isomer in 2-thiophenecarboxyhc acid [527-72-0] which is produced by oxidation of 2-acetylthiophene [88-15-3] and used in dmg appHcations, has been the driving force to find improved acylation catalysts. The most widely used oxidant is sodium hypochlorite, which produces a quantity of chloroform as by-product, a consequence that detracts from its simplicity. Separation of the phases and acidification of the aqueous phase precipitate the product which is filtered off. Alternative oxidants have included sodium nitrite in acid solution, which has some advantages, but, like the hypochlorite method, also involves very dilute solutions and low throughput volumes. [Pg.21]

The heating effect is the limiting factor for all electrophoretic separations. When heat is dissipated rapidly, as in capillary electrophoresis, rapid, high resolution separations are possible. For electrophoretic separations the higher the separating driving force, ie, the electric field strength, the better the resolution. This means that if a way to separate faster can be found, it should also be a more effective separation. This is the opposite of most other separation techniques. [Pg.179]

Alternate driving force approximations, item 2B in Table 16-12, for solid diffusion, and item 3B in Table 16-12, for pore diffusion, provide somewhat more accurate results in constant pattern packed-bed calculations with pore or solid diffusion controlling for constant separation factor systems. [Pg.1514]


See other pages where Driving force separability is mentioned: [Pg.130]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.256]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.10 ]




SEARCH



Separation force

© 2024 chempedia.info