Distillation towers azeotropic

Open-loop behavior of multicomponent distillation may be studied by solving modifications of the multicomponent equations of Distefano [Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 14, 190 (1968)] as presented in the subsection Batch Distillation. One frequent modification is to include an equation, such as the Francis weir formula, to relate liquid holdup on a tray to liquid flow rate leaving the tray. Applications to azeotropic-distillation towers are particularly interesting because, as discussed by and ihustrated in the Following example from Prokopalds and Seider... 

In such a process an additive or solvent of low volatility is introduced in the separation of mixtures of low relative volatilities or for concentrating a mixture beyond the azeotropic point. From an extractive distillation tower, the overhead is a finished product and the bottoms is an extract which is separated down the line into a product and the additive for recycle. The key property of the additive is that it enhance the relative volatilities of the substances to be separated. From a practical point of view, the additive should be stable, of low cost, require moderate reboiler temperatures particularly for mixtures subject to polymerization or thermal degradation, effective in low to moderate concentrations, and easily recoverable from the extract. Some common additives have boiling points 50-100°C higher than those of the products. 

A separation process is sought that can satisfy both our present economic and enviromental constraints. It would also provide an alternative to present practice that relies on expensive azeotropic or extractive distillation processes used in the recovery of products from low relative volatility streams. As an example, virtually all industrial butadiene recovery processes now rely on extractive distillation using acetonitrile or other equivalent agent to enhance the relative volatility of the C4 components. The use of supercritical or near critical separation of these streams may satisfy these requirements provided certain pressure, temperature and recompression criteria can be met. Such a process would also reduce the need for a complex train of distillation towers. 

FIG. 13-52 Azeotropic distillation tower for distillation of an ethanol-water mixture using benzene as a mass separating agent. [Ajier Prokopakis and Seider (op. cit.).]... 

Diethylether from ethanol Eliminadon of an azeotropic distillation tower 65,000 0.012 0.001... 

In such a process an additive or solvent of low volatility is introduced in the separation of mixtures of low relative volatilities or for concentrating a mixture beyond the azeotropic point. From an extractive distillation tower, the overhead is a finished product and the bottoms is an extract which is separated down the line into a product and the additive for recycle. The key property of... 

Finally, the acetone azine is hydrolyzed with water in a reaction distillation tower into acetone (head product) and a 10% aqueous hydrazine solution (sump product) at temperatures up to 180°C and pressures of 8 to 12 bar. The hydrazine solution is concentrated to its azeotrope composition of 64% by weight of hydrazine. The hydrazine yield is 80 to 90%, based on the hypochlorite utilized. 

Extraction-distillation An example involves the use of extraction to break the methanol + dichloromethane azeotrope. The near-azeotropic overheads from a distillation tower can be fed to an extrac-... 

Vented Decanters When the liquid-liquid stream to be decanted also contains a gas or vapor, provisions for venting the decanter must be included. This often is the case when decanting overheads condensate from an azeotropic distillation tower operating under vacuum, since... 

Figure 5.14 shows an ethanol process. The last unit is a distillation tower to remove water from a mixture of water and ethanol. Note that the mixture forms an azeotrope. The feed stream is 100 lb mol/h of a 50-50 molar mixture of water and ethanol at 80 F and 1 atm. 

Simulate a distillation tower to create the azeotropic mixture (93 percent ethanol). Use the Wilson-2 option for the thermodynamic model (see Figures... 

An example of pressure-swing distillation, described by Van Winkle (1967), is provided for the mixture, A-B, having a minimum-boiling azeotrope, with the T-x-y curves at two pressures shown in Figure 7.36a. To take advantage of the decrease in the composition of A as the pressure decreases from Pj to P[, a sequence of two distillation towers is shown in... 

When operating homogeneous azeotropic distillation towers, a convenient vehicle for permitting the compositions to cross a distillation boundary is to introduce a membrane separator, adsorber, or other auxiliary separator. Tbese are inserted either before or after the condenser of the distillation column and serve a similar role to the decanter in a heterogeneous azeotropic distillation tower, with the products having their compositions in adjacent distillation regions. 

Beginning with the need to separate a C-component mixture into several products, altenia-live sequences of two-product distillation towers are considered in this section. Although the synthesis strategies are not as well defined for highly nonideal and azeotropic mixtures, several steps are well recognized and are described next. It should be mentioned that these strategies continue to be developed, and variations are not uncommon. 

Prokopakis, G. J., and W. D. Seider, Dynamic Simulation of Azeotropic Distillation Towers, MChEJ.,29,1017(1983). 

The general arrangement normally used is shown in Fig. 10-1. The feed is introduced into the main extractive distillation tower, and the extractive agent is introduced a few plates below the top of the column. These top plates serve to remove the agent from the overhead product. In certain cases, such as the isoprene-amylene separation with acetone, the agent cannot be completely eliminated from the overhead product by this method owing to azeotrope formation. In such cases, other... 

As an example of such an operation, consider the process of Fig. 9.54, The separation of toluene (bp 110.8 C) from paraffin hydrocarbons of approximately the same molecular weight is either very difficult or impossible, due to low relative volatility or azeotropism, yet such a separation is necessary in the recovery of toluene from certain petroleum hydrocarbon mixtures. Using isooctane (bp = 99.3°C) as an example of a paraffin hydrocarbon, Fig. 9.54a shows that isooctane in this mixture is the more volatile, but the separation is obviously difficult. In the presence of phenol (bp = 181.4 C), however, the isooctane relative volatility increases, so that, with as much as 83 mole percent phenol in the liquid, the separation from toluene is relatively easy. A flowsheet for accomplishing this is shown in Fig. 9.546, where the binary mixture is introduced more or less centrally into the extractive distillation tower (1), and phenol as the solvent is introduced near the top so as to be present in high concentration upon most of the trays in the tower. Under these conditions isooctane is readily distilled as an overhead product, while toluene and phenol are removed as a residue. Although phenol is relatively high-boiling, its vapor pressure is nevertheless sufficient for its appearance in the overhead product to be prevented. The solvent-recovery section of the tower, which may be relatively short, serves to separate the phenol from the isooctane. The residue from the tower must be rectified in the auxiliary tower (2) to separate toluene from the phenol, which is recycled, but this is a relatively easy separation. In practice, the paraffin hydrocarbon is a mixture rather than the pure substance isooctane, but the principle of the operation remains the same. 

---