Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dispersion inversion, Tables

Our initial studies (23) were performed in toluene, and Table I shows the results from the polymerization of a number of representative monomers. The data reported in Table I are for direct addition of the monomer to the sodium dispersion. Inverse addition often leads to higher molecular weights, although the overall polymer yields are usually lower (15,23). The results in Table I show that, under these reaction conditions, a bimodal molecular molecular weight distribution is normally obtained. Furthermore, it is obvious that the crude polymer yields drop precipitously as the steric hindrance in the monomer increases. [Pg.44]

Attractive forces between neutral molecules may include three contributions according to the nature of the molecule. These three interaction energies are dipole-dipole or Keesom interactions, dipole-induced dipole or Debye interactions, and induced dipole-induced dipole interactions or London dispersion forces (Table 3.1). Since all of them depend on the inverse of the sixth power of the intramolecular distance, they are generally combined in only one term, representing the total van der Waals attraction and this term is the sum of the three energies ... [Pg.138]

Bunimovich et al. (1995) lumped the melt and solid phases of the catalyst but still distinguished between this lumped solid phase and the gas. Accumulation of mass and heat in the gas were neglected as were dispersion and conduction in the catalyst bed. This results in the model given in Table V with the radial heat transfer, conduction, and gas phase heat accumulation terms removed. The boundary conditions are different and become identical to those given in Table IX, expanded to provide for inversion of the melt concentrations when the flow direction switches. A dimensionless form of the model is given in Table XI. Parameters used in the model will be found in Bunimovich s paper. [Pg.244]

To illustrate the application of the Monte Carlo method, we consider the problem of simulating the dispersion of material emitted from a continuous line source located between the ground and an inversion layer. A similar case has been considered by Runca et al. (1981). We assume that the mean wind u is constant and that the slender-plume approximation holds. The line source is located at a height h between the ground (z = 0) and an inversion layer (z = Zi). If the ground is perfectly reflecting, the analytical expression for the mean concentration is found by integrating the last entry of Table II over y from -< to -Hoo. The result can be expressed as... [Pg.291]

Gifford and Hanna tested their simple box model for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide predictions for annual or seasonal averages against diffusion-model predictions. Their conclusions are summarized in Table 5-3. The correlation coefficient of observed concentrations versus calculated concentrations is generally higher for the simple model than for the detailed model. Hanna calculated reactions over a 6-h period on September 30, 1%9, with his chemically reactive adaptation of the simple dispersion model. He obtained correlation coefficients of observed and calculated concentrations as follows nitric oxide, 0.97 nitrogen dioxide, 0.05 and rhc, 0.55. He found a correlation coefficient of 0.48 of observed ozone concentration with an ozone predictor derived from a simple model, but he pointed out that the local inverse wind speed had a correlation of 0.66 with ozone concentration. He derived a critical wind speed formula to define a speed below which ozone prediction will be a problem with the simple model. Further performance of the simple box model compared with more detailed models is discussed later. [Pg.226]

We have studied the dispersibility of several pure PVAc-styrene graft copolymers with one PS branch in various selective solvents mainly at room temperature5. The experiment was done with two kinds of dried samples one was recovered from a tetrahydrofuran solution by pouring it into water and the other from a benzene solution which was poured into n-hexane. Let us refer to the former sample as A and the latter sample as B. Due to the difference in solubility of each polymer sequence in those solvents, sample A is supposed to have approximately such a microstructure that PVAc chains are extended and PS chains collapsed, while sample B has the inverse structure. A similar tendency was also pointed out by Merrett12. The results are summarized in Table 2. [Pg.59]

With a four-phase model, the results are shown in Table 7.1 where the mean square error (MSE) represents the goodness-of-fit parameter. The uncertainties of the film thickness listed in Table 7.1 were obtained with a 90% confidence limit. To verify that the dispersion in the experimental spectral range (1.55-6.53 eV) is correct, we used the data inversion to obtain its pseudo-optical constants (< n ) and ). Theseconstants are calculated from the measured 4 and A using the film thickness obtained from the fitting. [Pg.87]

To that end we have constructed a simulation of a fictitious system that has a severe inverse response. We show the design in Fig. 5.28 and give the design parameters in Table 5.1. The reactor has a large Lewis number (Le = 25), nearly complete per pass conversion of the reactant, and little axial dispersion. These are all factors necessary for wrong-way behavior. In fact the example plot of wrong-way behavior shown in Chap. 4 was generated from this reactor. [Pg.176]

An article by Karam (1) gives typical data to illustrate the difference between shear rate and shear stress. Table II is extracted from cross plots of their data, showing the shear rate required with different continuous phase viscosities and one dispersed phase viscosity to break up a second fluid of the same size droplet. This shows that the shear stress in grams per centimeter squared is the basic parameter and the viscosity and shear rate are inversely proportional to give the required shear stress. [Pg.228]

Table IV presents some data on liquid residence time distributions measured under conditions of hydrocracking in trickle flow. It can be seen that bed dilution with fine inert particles results in a considerable improvement in the plug-flow character of the reactor, which supports the idea that the dispersion is largely determined by the packing of fine particles. Since in the range of Re numbers of interest the Bodenstein number is approximately a constant (see Figure 4), the Peclet numbers for beds of equal length should be inversely proportional to the particle diameter. Dilution of the 1.5 mm particles with 0.2 mm particles should raise Pe by a factor of about 7, which is approximately in line with the data in Table IV. Table IV presents some data on liquid residence time distributions measured under conditions of hydrocracking in trickle flow. It can be seen that bed dilution with fine inert particles results in a considerable improvement in the plug-flow character of the reactor, which supports the idea that the dispersion is largely determined by the packing of fine particles. Since in the range of Re numbers of interest the Bodenstein number is approximately a constant (see Figure 4), the Peclet numbers for beds of equal length should be inversely proportional to the particle diameter. Dilution of the 1.5 mm particles with 0.2 mm particles should raise Pe by a factor of about 7, which is approximately in line with the data in Table IV.
The specific surface area (A), i.e., the surface area per unit volume of dispersion, is proportional to

inversely proportional to d. For monodisperse spherical particles, A = 6

[Pg.314]

From Tables 3, 5, and 6 it is seen that refractions change in some inverse manner with the wave-length A of the light by which they are measured the variations originate, of course, in the refractive indices entering the Lorentz-Lorenz function (1). Since 1827, a number of equations have been developed to describe dispersions of refractive indices n (Wood, 1934, and Partington, 1953, give historical and other details) of these, those due to Cauchy (9) and Sellmeier (10) appear to be best known and most used... [Pg.34]

The relative concentrations of the individual low-molecular-weight hydrocarbons in Table V indicate that these were residual in dispersed oil droplets, so were not in true solution at the time of collection. As for evaporation (discussed above), hydrocarbons (each class, i.e., alkane, cycloalkane, and aromatic) would dissolve into water in inverse proportion to their molecular weights. The smaller the molecule, the higher was the amount found in solution for a given concentration in the oil phase. [Pg.217]

I lore, dOldk, a measure of dispersion, is seen to be inversely proportional to d. Table 12-3 provides disper-sion. aia for the various crystals at their maximum and niininflim wavelengths. The low dispersion of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate prohibits its use in the region of short wavelengths here, a crystal such as topar or lithium fluoride must be substituted. [Pg.313]

A power plant burns 10 kg h of coal containing 2.5% sulfur. The effluent is released from a single stack of height 70 m. The plume rise is normally about 30 m, so that the effective height of emission is 100 m. The wind on the day of interest, which is a sunny summer day, is blowing at 4 m s . There is no inversion layer. Use the Pasquill-Gifford dispersion parameters from Table 18.2. [Pg.949]

Table 16.5). In this instance, however, the particles were dispersed in cyclohexane rather than ethyl benzene. Moreover, the dispersions were said to undergo phase separation rather than particle flocculation. The data reported by de Hek and Vrij for two particle sizes suggest that V2 is inversely related to the particle radius, rather than the square root of the particle radius. The radius dependence observed for this system is that which would be predicted if the ideal van t Hoff term was predominantly responsible for the osmotic pressure of the polymer solution, since AG would then be proportional to V2 a, i.e. V2 oc 1/a. This result is scarcely surprising since cyclohexane is a poor solvent for polystyrene (0=34°C). In those circumstances, only the ideal contribution to the osmotic pressure need be considered. The different radius dependences observed in such experiments is accordingly explained. Table 16.5). In this instance, however, the particles were dispersed in cyclohexane rather than ethyl benzene. Moreover, the dispersions were said to undergo phase separation rather than particle flocculation. The data reported by de Hek and Vrij for two particle sizes suggest that V2 is inversely related to the particle radius, rather than the square root of the particle radius. The radius dependence observed for this system is that which would be predicted if the ideal van t Hoff term was predominantly responsible for the osmotic pressure of the polymer solution, since AG would then be proportional to V2 a, i.e. V2 oc 1/a. This result is scarcely surprising since cyclohexane is a poor solvent for polystyrene (0=34°C). In those circumstances, only the ideal contribution to the osmotic pressure need be considered. The different radius dependences observed in such experiments is accordingly explained.

See other pages where Dispersion inversion, Tables is mentioned: [Pg.163]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.886]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.407]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.13 ]




SEARCH



Dispersion table

© 2024 chempedia.info