Dispersion distance

When considering release scenarios, the most hazardous unit in a plant should be chosen, based on inventoiy and process conditions. The idea is to imagine the release of material in the fastest way that is reasonably possible. The worst realistic scenario should be considered. This can be based on the outcome of a review, from a HAZOP study or a hazard analysis. The time a scenario will take is almost always considered to be continuous, because after a few minutes a stable dispersion distance exists. Making the time longer will not necessarily change the hazard distance. 

Augsberger, C.K. Seedling survival of tropical tree species interactions of dispersal distance, light-gaps, and pathogens. Ecology 1984 65 1705-1712. 

The lower the concentration of interest, the larger the dispersion distance. As with the source release rate, the effect is not linear. 

Maximum Predicted Impact of Water Spray on Dispersion Distances at a Water to Ammonia Ratio of 5 (water flow is 19 kg/s from all 20 nozzles)... 

The external force applied may enhance the anomalous transport in fractal structures (Roman et al., 1989). Therefore, anomalous features can be even more pronounced in the gravity-affected vertical water transport than in the horizontal water transport. General considerations of Roman et al. (1989) imply that the scaling variable x/f1 in (Eq. [2]) should be in this case replaced by the scaling variable xFiogit). Presence of sharp changes in soil hydraulic and transport properties that can be encountered during vertical flow in soils may make the dispersion/distance relations considerably more complex than they are in the media where the FADE has been shown to be effective. The efficiency of the FADE in such situations remains to be seen. 

Past range shifts were accomplished by seed dispersal 10-100 km beyond the species range limit. The frequency of long-distance dispersal events has not been adequately measured, but data show clearly that the average dispersal distance differs between species. Migration models will have to include species-specific dispersal parameters. 

We considered three questions 1) Do populations colonize trees of different physiological conditions during endemic versus eruptive phases 2) Are behavioral responses to phytochemieals heritable 3) Do beetles from eruptive vs. endemie populations differ in responses to phytochemieals We eondueted this researeh in 29 sites in three regions Alaska, Yukon Territory in Canada, and Utah. The 15 eruptive and 14 endemic sites were evenly distributed among the 3 regions, all sites were nearly pure spruce monoeultures separated by more than the effeetive dispersal distance of D. rufipennis, and contained trees that did not differ in monoterpene concentration or stem diameter. 

Surrounding Terrain greatly affeets the dispersion proeess. For example, rough terrain involving trees, shrubs, buildings, and structures usually enhance air entrainment. This leads to shorter dispersion distances than a release that oeeurs in open or relatively flat terrain. 

Limiting Concentration affects the dispersion distance inversely. Lower limiting concentrations lead to larger dispersion distances. As with the source release rate, the effect is not linear. In other words, a factor of 100 reduction in the hmiting concentration may result in an increase in the dispersion distance by only a factor of 10 to 20. When selecting endpoints, or levels of concern, it is important to make a distinction between concentrations where there will be some observable effect, and concentrations at which one can expect serious ill effects. 

Optionl has the lowest individual risk, which is driven by the fact that the entire route runs through a suburban population density as compared to the full range of population densities for the current operation and Option 2. Additionally, the individual risk for Option 2 is lower than the current option due to the shorter dispersion distances, which is attributable to the smaller package design (as detailed in Table 5.5). 

Any given reserve should be as close to circular as possible as this minimizes dispersal distances within the reserve. An elongated reserve may suffer local extinctions at the ends. 

Jenkins, D.G., Brescacin, C.R., Duxbury, C.V. et al. (2007). Does size matter for dispersal distance Global Ecology and Biogeography 16,415-425. 

For short stacks and for ground level sources, measure u at an elevation of 10 m. This u may be used for downwind dispersion distances up to 1.0 km. 

For tall stacks or for downwind dispersion distances greater than 1.0 km, u should be determined at the mean height of the plume or averaged through the vertical extent... 

Permeation of gases through composite systems is a complex event and is influenced by a number of system parameters (Mai et al., 2004 Shields, 2008 Robeson, 2003 Bhardwaj, 2001) like the aspect ratio of the filler, extent of filler dispersion, orientation of the fillers and interparticle dispersion distance, filler loading fraction by volume, the density and crystallinity of the matrix, and the affinity between diffusion gases and the composite system. However, for modeling the permeabUity behavior, much simpler approaches have been used successfully. 

---