Dispersion coefficients application

Two complementai y reviews of this subject are by Shah et al. AIChE Journal, 28, 353-379 [1982]) and Deckwer (in de Lasa, ed.. Chemical Reactor Design andTechnology, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, pp. 411-461). Useful comments are made by Doraiswamy and Sharma (Heterogeneous Reactions, Wiley, 1984). Charpentier (in Gianetto and Silveston, eds.. Multiphase Chemical Reactors, Hemisphere, 1986, pp. 104—151) emphasizes parameters of trickle bed and stirred tank reactors. Recommendations based on the literature are made for several design parameters namely, bubble diameter and velocity of rise, gas holdup, interfacial area, mass-transfer coefficients k a and /cl but not /cg, axial liquid-phase dispersion coefficient, and heat-transfer coefficient to the wall. The effect of vessel diameter on these parameters is insignificant when D > 0.15 m (0.49 ft), except for the dispersion coefficient. Application of these correlations is to (1) chlorination of toluene in the presence of FeCl,3 catalyst, (2) absorption of SO9 in aqueous potassium carbonate with arsenite catalyst, and (3) reaction of butene with sulfuric acid to butanol. 

FIG. 26-54 Horizontal dispersion coefficient for Pasquill-Gifford plume model, Reprinted ffomD. A. Ct owl and J. F. Louvar, Chemical Process Safety, Fundamentals with Applications, Z.9.90, p. 138. Used hy permission of Ft entice Hall)... 

FIG. 26 57 Vertical dispersion coefficient for Pasqiiill-Gifford puff model. These data are based only on the data points shown and should not he considered rehahle elsewhere. (Reprinted from D. A. Cr owl and J. F. Louvar Chemical Process Safety, Fiiudanieutals with Applications, 1990, p. 140. Used hy permission of Prentice Hall. )... 

Worst-case atmospheric conditions occur to maximize (C). This occurs with minimum dispersion coefficients and minimum wind speed u within a stability class. By inspection of Figs. 26-54 and 26-55 and Table 26-28, this occurs with F-stability and u = 2 m/s. At 300 m = 0.3 km, from Figs. 26-54 and 26-55, <3 = 11m and <3 = 5 m. The concentration in ppm is converted to kg/m by application of the ideal gas law. A pressure of 1 atm and temperature of 298 K are assumed. 

SCREEN allows for the selection of urban or rural dispersion coefficients. The urban dispersion option is selected by entering a U (lower or upper case) in column 1, while the rural dispersion option is selected by entering an R (upper or lower case) in column 1. Determination of the applicability of urban or rural dispersion is based upon land use or population density. In general, if 50 percent or more of an area 3 km around the source satisfies the urban criteria (Auer, 1978), the site is deemed in an urban setting. Of the two methods, the land use procedure is considered more definitive. 

A sum-over-states expression for the coefficient A for the expansion of the diagonal components faaaa was derived by Bishop and De Kee [20] and calculations were reported for the atoms H and He. However, the usual approach to calculate dispersion coefficients for many-electron systems by means of ab initio response methods is still to extract these coefficients from a polynomial fit to pointwise calculated frequency-dependent hyperpolarizabiiities. Despite the inefficiency and the numerical difficulties of such an approach [16,21], no ab initio implementation has yet been reported for analytic dispersion coefficients for frequency-dependent second hyperpolarizabiiities which is applicable to many-electron systems. 

In the next section we derive the Taylor expansion of the coupled cluster cubic response function in its frequency arguments and the equations for the required expansions of the cluster amplitude and Lagrangian multiplier responses. For the experimentally important isotropic averages 7, 7i and yx we give explicit expressions for the A and higher-order coefficients in terms of the coefficients of the Taylor series. In Sec. 4 we present an application of the developed approach to the second hyperpolarizability of the methane molecule. We test the convergence of the hyperpolarizabilities with respect to the order of the expansion and investigate the sensitivity of the coefficients to basis sets and correlation treatment. The results are compared with dispersion coefficients derived by least square fits to experimental hyperpolarizability data or to pointwise calculated hyperpolarizabilities of other ab inito studies. 

The results just obtained for < y) are, however, rarely used in applications because (v ) and T are generally not known. The Gaussian dispersion parameters aj and al are, in a sense, generalizations of (Cj) and particle displacement variances o-y and a-] are not calculated by Eq. (8.8). Rather, they are treated as empirical dispersion coefficients the functional forms of which are determined by matching the Gaussian solution to data. In that way, the empirically determined a-y and deviations from stationary, homogeneous conditions which are inherent in the assumed Gaussian distribution. 

Amongst the assumptions we have made in developing the model are the following that Pick s law is applicable to the diffusion processes, the gel particles are isotropic and behave as hard spheres, the flow rate is uniform throughout the bed, the dispersion in the column Ccui be approximated by the use of an axial dispersion coefficient cuid that polymer molecules have an independent existence (i.e. very dilute solution conditions exist within the column). Our approach borrows extensively many of the concepts which have been developed to interpret the behaviour of packed bed tubular reactors (5). 

Here, is the distance between atoms i andj, C(/ is a dispersion coefficient for atoms i andj, which can be calculated directly from tabulated properties of the individual atoms, and /dampF y) is a damping function to avoid unphysical behavior of the dispersion term for small distances. The only empirical parameter in this expression is S, a scaling factor that is applied uniformly to all pairs of atoms. In applications of DFT-D, this scaling factor has been estimated separately for each functional of interest by optimizing its value with respect to collections of molecular complexes in which dispersion interactions are important. There are no fundamental barriers to applying the ideas of DFT-D within plane-wave DFT calculations. In the work by Neumann and Perrin mentioned above, they showed that adding dispersion corrections to forces... 

The diffusion coefficient is often not a function of distance, such that equation (2.13) can be further simplified by putting the constant value diffusion coefficient in front of the partial derivative. However, we will also be substituting turbulent diffusion and dispersion coefficients for D when appropriate to certain applications, and they are not always constant in all directions. Therefore, we will leave the diffusion coefficient inside the brackets for now. 

As already said, Taylor s effective model contains a contribution in the effective diffusion coefficient, which is proportional to the square of the transversal Peclet number. Frequently this term is more important than the original molecular diffusion. After his work, it is called Taylor s dispersion coefficient and it is generally accepted and used in chemical engineering numerical simulations. For the practical applications we refer to the classical paper (Rubin, 1983) by Rubin. The mathematical study of the models from Rubin (1983) was undertaken in Friedman and Knabner (1992). 

There are no direct correlations of the variance (or the corresponding parameter n) in terms of the geometry and operating conditions of a vessel. For this reason the RTD is not yet a design tool, but it does have value as a diagnostic tool for the performance of existing equipment on which tracer tests can be made. RTDs obtained from tracer tests or perhaps estimated from dispersion coefficient data or correlations sometimes are applicable to the prediction of the limits between which a chemical conversion can take place in the vessel. 

Consider a fluid flowing steadily along a uniform pipe as depicted in Fig. 2.13 the fluid will be assumed to have a constant density so that the mean velocity u is constant. Let the fluid be carrying along the pipe a small amount of a tracer which has been injected at some point upstream as a pulse distributed uniformly over the cross-section the concentration C of the tracer is sufficiently small not to affect the density. Because the system is not in a steady state with respect to the tracer distribution, the concentration will vary with both z the position in the pipe and, at any fixed position, with time i.e. C is a function of both z and t but, at any given value of z and t, C is assumed to be uniform across that section of pipe. Consider a material balance on the tracer over an element of the pipe between z and (z + Sz), as shown in Fig. 2.13, in a time interval St. For convenience the pipe will be considered to have unit area of cross-section. The flux of tracer into and out of the element will be written in terms of the dispersion coefficient DL in accordance with equation 2.12. For completeness and for later application to reactors (see Section 2.3.7) the possibility of disappearance of the tracer by chemical reaction is also taken into account through a rate of reaction term 9L... 

Another interesting application of the data in Fig. 2.20 for dispersion coefficients in turbulent flow is in calculating the mixing that occurs in long pipelines. Many refined petroleum products are distributed by pipelines which may extend over hundreds of kilometres. The same pipeline is used to convey several different products, each... 

Because of their structural and conformational complexity, polypeptides, proteins, and their feedstock contaminants thus represent an especially challenging case for the development of reliable adsorption models. Iterative simulation approaches, involving the application of several different isothermal representations8,367 369 enable an efficient strategy to be developed in terms of computational time and cost. Utilizing these iterative strategies, more reliable values of the relevant adsorption parameters, such as q, Kd, or the mass transfer coefficients (the latter often lumped into an apparent axial dispersion coefficient), can be derived, enabling the model simulations to more closely approximate the physical reality of the actual adsorption process. 

For soils without appreciable clay aggregation, the experimental results and theoretical analysis described here indicate that when diffusion is rate-limiting, the ratio of the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient to the estimated soil self-diffusion coefficient may be a useful indicator of the applicability of the local equilibrium assumption. For reacting solutes in laboratory columns such as those used in this study, systems with ratios near unity can be modeled using equilibrium chemistry. 

---