Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dirac-type Hamiltonian

For most chemical applications, one is not interested in negative energy solutions of a four-component Dirac-type Hamiltonian. In addition, the computational expense of treating four-component complex-valued wave functions often limited such calculations to benchmark studies of atoms and small molecules. Therefore, much effort was put into developing and implementing approximate quantum chemistry methods which explicitly treat only the electron degrees of freedom, namely two- and one-component relativistic formulations [2]. This analysis also holds for a relativistic DFT approach and the solutions of the corresponding DKS equation. [Pg.661]

There is increasing interest in the relativistic treatment of atoms/ molecules/ and solids. A relativistic Hartree-Fock scheme [Hartree-Fock-Dirac (HFD) method] based on the variation in the total energy obtained with a single Slater determinant (in which the one-electron orbitals are four-component Dirac spinors), using a Dirac-type Hamiltonian for each electron and including Coulomb interaction, was developed some time ago.< For the remaining interaction terms the first-order perturbation of the Breit interaction operato reduced to large components (Pauli approximation) is usually taken into account (see, however, the work of Mann and Johnson ). [Pg.34]

In this paper, the general theory developed in Part I is applied to the Hartree-Fock Scheme for a transformed many-electron Hamiltonian. It is shown that, if the transformation is a product of one-electron transformations, then the Fock-Dirac operator as well as the effective Hamiltonian undergo similarity transformations of the one-electron type. The special properties of the Hartree-Fock scheme for a real self-adjoint Hamiltonian based on the bi-variational principle are discussed in greater detail. [Pg.187]

This corresponds to the principle of minimal coupling, according to which the interaction with a magnetic field is described by replacing in the Hamiltonian operator the canonical momentum p by the kinetic momentum 11 = p — f A(x). Other types of external-field interactions include scalar or pseudoscalar fields and anomalous magnetic moment interactions. The classification of external fields rests on the behavior of the Dirac equation rmder Lorentz transformations. A brief description of these potential matrices will be given below. [Pg.29]

An improved basis set with 36s32p24d22fl0g7h6i uncontracted Gaussian-type orbitals was used and all 119 electrons were correlated, leading to a better estimate of the electron affinity within the Dirac-Coulomb-Breit Hamiltonian, 0.064(2) eV [102]. Since the method for calculating the QED corrections [101] is based on the one-electron orbital picture, the 8s orbital of El 18 was extracted from the correlated wave function by... [Pg.113]

In the case of a relativistic system, as a first (and useful) approximation, the zero-order spectrum can be taken as the nonrelativistic one, with Hq defined explicifly as fhe Coulomb Hamiltonian. Then, the perturbation V is also written explicitly as the relativistic Breit-Pauli operators, and it is this perturbation that turns the initially discrete state into a resonance. For example, this type of advanced calculation, with multichannel coupling included, has been shown to explain quantitatively the positions and lifetimes of the relativistic levels of mefastable states in negative ions [90]. However, if the more accurate four-component relativistic Dirac treatment for each electron is invoked for cases of high effective nuclear charge, then the stability against autoionization implies not only the exclusion of components representing decay to... [Pg.199]

By the mid-1960 s it was recognized that this simple picture was not adequate. Sandars and Beck (1965) showed how relativistic effects of the type first described by Casimir (1963) could be accommodated by generalizing the non-relativistic Hamiltonian to the form given by (108). A rather profound mental adjustment was required instead of setting the relativistic Hamiltonian between products of four-component Dirac eigenfunctions, they asked for the effective operator that accomplishes the same result when set between non-relativistic states. The coefficients ujf now involve sums over integrals of the type dr, where Fj and Gj,... [Pg.161]

Four-component methods are computationally expensive since one has to deal with small-component integrals. Therefore, various two-component methods in which small-component degrees of freedom are removed have flourished in the literature. We focus the present discussion on the X2c theory at one-electron level (X2c-le). The X2c-le scheme consists of a one-step block diagonalization of the Dirac Hamiltonian in its matrix representation via a Foldy-Wouthuysen-type matrix unitary transformation ... [Pg.125]

We have already seen in section 8.1 that (i) a Dirac electron with electromagnetic potentials created by all other electrons [cf. Eq. (8.2)] cannot be solved analytically, which is the reason why the total wave function as given in Eq. (8.4) cannot be calculated, and also that (ii) the electromagnetic interactions may be conveniently expressed through the 4-currents of the electrons as given in Eq. (8.31) for the two-electron case. Now, we seek a one-electron Dirac equation, which can be solved exactly so that a Hartree-type product becomes the exact wave function of this system. Such a separation, in order to be exact (after what has been said in section 8.5), requires a Hamiltonian, which is a sum of strictly local operators. The local interaction terms may be extracted from a 4-current based interaction energy such as that in Eq. (8.31). Of course, we need to take into account Pauli exchange effects that were omitted in section 8.1.4, and we also need to take account of electron correlation effects. This leads us to the Kohn-Sham (KS) model of DFT. [Pg.318]

A key element for the reduction to two-component form is the analysis of the relationship between the large and small components of exact eigenfunctions of the Dirac equation, which we have already encountered in section 5.4.3. This relationship emerges because of the (2 x 2)-superstructure of the Dirac Hamiltonian, see, e.g., Eq. (5.135), which turned out to be conserved upon derivation of the one-electron Fock-type equations as presented in chapter 8. Hence, because of the (2 x 2)-superstructure of Fock-type one-electron operators, we may assume that a general relation. [Pg.436]

We start this chapter by reexamining the quantization of the nonrelativistic Hamiltonian and draw out some features that will be useful in the quantization of the relativistic Hamiltonian. We then turn to the Dirac equation and sketch its derivation. We discuss some properties of the equation and its solutions, and show how going to the nonrelativistic limit reduces it to a Schrodinger-type equation containing spin. [Pg.35]

The total Hamiltonian contains three types of contributions the one-electron Dirac Hamiltonion, the Coulomb repulsion and the Breit interaction. These contributions, which appear in the energy expression, give rise to radial integrals, which need to be calculated for the two component wave function. We will simply state the MCDF equations, which can be obtained by applying the variational... [Pg.153]


See other pages where Dirac-type Hamiltonian is mentioned: [Pg.92]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1030]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.1211]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.1031]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.2471]    [Pg.71]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Dirac Hamiltonian

© 2024 chempedia.info