Dirac-Lorentz

The Dirac equation is invariant to Lorentz transformations [8], a necessary requirement of a relativistic equation. In the limit of large quantum numbers the Dirac equation reduces to the Klein-Gordon equation [9,10]. The time-independent form of Dirac s Hamiltonian is given by... 

I returned to the University of Toronto in the summer of 1940, having completed a Master s degree at Princeton, to enroll in a Ph.D. program under Leopold Infeld for which I wrote a thesis entitled A Study in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Based on Sir A.S. Eddington s Relativity Theory of Protons and Electrons. This book summarized his thought about the constants of Nature to which he had been led by his shock that Dirac s equation demonstrated that a theory which was invariant under Lorentz transformation need not be expressed in terms of tensors. 

We state, however, that at about COP a 2.0 Special Dirac sea hole current phenomena are encountered in close-looping, as a new kind of decay mechanism from the disequilibrium state back to the Lorentz equilibrium. Bedini and Bearden have filed a patent application for energy transduction processes to overcome this effect and allow close-looping. 

In other words, it is the distance, ct, travelled by light in a given time interval which fulfills the role of the fourth coordinate, rather than the time interval itself. The special theory of relativity requires that after a Lorentz transformation the new form of all laws of physics is the same as the old form. The Dirac equation, for example, is invariant under a Lorentz transformation. 

The relativistic Lorentz-Dirac description of the electron is generally accepted to be the ultimate classical description, albeit without Dirac s physical... 

It was pointed out by Dirac [230] that the contradiction between relativity and the aether is resolved within quantum theory, since the velocity of a quantum aether becomes subject to uncertainty relations. For a particular state at a certain point in space-time, the velocity is no longer well defined, but follows a probability distribution. A perfect vacuum state, in accordance with special relativity, could then have a wave function that equalizes the velocity of the aether in all directions. The passage from classical to quantum theory affects the interpretation of symmetry relationships. As an example, the Is state of the hydrogen atom is centrosymmetric only in quantum, but not in classical theory. A related redefinition of quantum symmetry provides the means of reconciling the disturbance of Lorentz symmetry in space-time, produced by the existence of an aether with the principle of relativity. 

Dirac equation. Leading-order Lorentz violating energy shifts 61/12 and di/34 can be obtained from a Hamiltonian using perturbation theory and relativistic two-fermion techniques. For our observed transitions at the strong magnetic field of 1.7 T, dominantly only muon spin flip occurs so the energy shifts are characterized by the muon parameters alone of the extended theory. The results of this approach are [4] ... 

Requiring these order parameters to transform in a Lorentz-covariant way, we are led to a particular basis of 4 x 4 matrices , which was recently derived in detail (Capelle and Gross 1999a). The resulting order parameters represent a Lorentz scalar (one component), a four vector (four components), a pseudo scalar (one component), an axial four vector (four components), and an antisymmetric tensor of rank two (six independent components). This set of 4 x 4 matrices is different from the usual Dirac y matrices. The latter only lead to a Lorentz scalar, a four vector, etc., when combined with one creation and one annihilation operator, whereas the order parameter consists of two annihilation operators. 

The 16 order parameters in Equation (5.16), with the matrices 77, given in Capelle and Gross (1999a), exhaust the possible pairings which can be formed from two Dirac spinors. The most important among these 16 order parameters is the Lorentz scalar... 

In this section we briefly review the main properties of the Dirac equation that is the basic equation to start with to build a relativistic effective Hamiltonian for atomic and molecular calculations. This single particle equation, as already stated in the introduction, was established in 1928 by P.A.M Dirac [1] as the Lorentz invariant counterpart of the Schrodinger equation. On a note let us recall that the first attempts to replace the Schrodinger equation by an equation fulfilling the requirements of special relativity started just after quantum... 

Furthermore large basis sets are needed for an accurate description of the region close to the nucleus where relativistic effects become important. Methods based on the replacement of the Dirac operator by approximate bound operators (square of the Dirac operator, its absolute value etc...) have not been very successful as can been understood from the fact that they break the Lorentz invariance for fermions. 

This corresponds to the principle of minimal coupling, according to which the interaction with a magnetic field is described by replacing in the Hamiltonian operator the canonical momentum p by the kinetic momentum 11 = p — f A(x). Other types of external-field interactions include scalar or pseudoscalar fields and anomalous magnetic moment interactions. The classification of external fields rests on the behavior of the Dirac equation rmder Lorentz transformations. A brief description of these potential matrices will be given below. 

The group of Poincare transformations consists of coordinate transformations (rotations, translations, proper Lorentz transformations...) linking the different inertial frames that are supposed to be equivalent for the description of nature. The free Dirac equation is invariant under these Poincare transformations. More precisely, the free Dirac equation is invariant under (the covering group of) the proper orthochronous Poincare group, which excludes the time reversal and the space-time inversion, but does include the parity transformation (space reflection). 

From 7q = I4 we see immediately that V = cjoVcov- The equation (83) is called the Dirac equation in covariant form. It is best suited for investigations concerning relativistic invariance, because it me is a scalar (which by definition of a scalar is invariant under Lorentz transformations) and the term (7,5) is written in the form of a Minkowski scalar product (if 7 and d were ordinary vectors in Minkowski space, the invariance of this term would be already guaranteed by (81). 

Levy-Leblond [16] has realized that not only the Lorentz group (or rather the homomorphic group SL(2) [32, 7]), but also the Galilei group has spinor-field representations. While the simplest possible spinor field with s = I and m 0 in the Lorentz framework is described by the Dirac equation, the corresponding field in a Galilei-invariant theory satisfies the Levy-Leblond equation (LLE)... 

The most obvious objection to the Dirac-Coulomb operator is that the instemt-aneous Coulomb interaction, l/r -, is manifestly not Lorentz invariant. It is, however, the leading term of the covariant interaction... 

In his detailed analysis of Dirac s theory [6], de Broglie pointed out that, in spite of his equation being Lorentz invariant and its four-component wave function providing tensorial forms for all physical properties in space-time, it does not have space and time playing full symmetrical roles, in part because the condition of hermiticity for quantum operators is defined in the space domain while time appears only as a parameter. In addition, space-time relativistic symmetry requires that Heisenberg s uncertainty relations. 

This equation has at least one advantage over the Schrodinger equation ct and x, y, z enter the equation on equal footing, whieh is required by special relativity. Moreover, the Fock-Klein-Gordon equation is invariant with respect to the Lorentz transformation, whereas the Schrodinger equation is not. This is a prerequisite of any relativity-consistent theory, and it is remarkable that such a simple derivation made the theory invariant. The invariance, however, does not mean that the equation is accurate. The Fock-Klein-Gordon equation describes a boson particle because vk is a usual scalar-type function, in contrast to what we will see shortly in the Dirac equation. 

Paul Dirac used the Fock-Klein-Gordon equation to derive a Lorentz transformation invariant equation for a single fermion particle. The Dirac equation is solvable only for several very simple cases. One of them is the free particle (Dirac), and the other is an electron in the electrostatic field of a nucleus (Charles Darwin-but not the one you are thinking of). 

Despite the glorious invariance with respect to the Lorentz transformation and despite spectacular successes, the Dirac equation has some serious drawbacks, including a lack of clear physical interpretation. These drawbacks are removed by a more advanced theory-quantum electrodynamics. 

The Dirac equation is rigorously invariant with respect to the Lorentz transformation, which is certainly the most important requirement for a relativistic theory. Therefore, it would seem to be a logically sound approximation for a relativistic description of a single quantum particle. Unfortunately, this is not true. Recall that the Dirac Hamiltonian spectrum contains a... 

Breit constructed a many-electron relativistic theory that takes into aceount sueh a retarded potential in an approximate way. Breit explicitly considered only the electrons of an atom its nucleus (similar to the Dirac theory) created only an external field for the electrons. This ambitious project was only partly successful because the resulting theory turned out to be approximate not only from the point of view of quantum theory (wifli some interactions not taken into account), but also from the point of view of relativity theory (an approximate Lorentz transformation invariance). 

The Dirac equation makes the kinetic energy part of the SchrOdinger equation invariant for the Lorentz transformation (Dirac 1928) ... 

One of the central problems in the theory of P decay is the determination of the Hamilton operator of the weak interaction (O Eqs. (2.71) and O (2.72)). H should be invariant against proper Lorentz transformation, otherwise it would be possible to determine an absolute time, which is impossible according to the theory of relativity. Then, from Dirac s relativistic wave mechanics for spin 1/2 particles, it follows that there may be five classes of weak interaction terms, each transforming in a particular way under rotation and space inversion scalar (S), vector (V), antisymmetric tensor of second rank (T), axial vector (A), and pseudoscalar (P). As one cannot exclude any of these from the beginning, a linear combination of all five interactions must be considered ... 

---