Parity transformation

Space inversion (or parity transformation), x —> —x This symmetry is equivalent to the reflection in a plane (i.e. mirror symmetry), as one can be obtained from the other by combination with rotation through angle 7r. 

It is a simple matter to see that /, is equivalent to a rotation by n, and that 1 is equivalent to a total inversion Is followed by a rotation by n about the normal to the coordinate plane. Therefore, it suffices to consider the single independent space reflection transformation Is to be referred to as space inversion or parity transformation. 

In 4-dimensional space-time the space inversion or parity transformation Is is given by the diagonal matrix Is — 1,-1,—1,-1, the negative of the matrix representing the metric tensor gThe time-reversal transformation, It, i-e. 

The group of Poincare transformations consists of coordinate transformations (rotations, translations, proper Lorentz transformations...) linking the different inertial frames that are supposed to be equivalent for the description of nature. The free Dirac equation is invariant under these Poincare transformations. More precisely, the free Dirac equation is invariant under (the covering group of) the proper orthochronous Poincare group, which excludes the time reversal and the space-time inversion, but does include the parity transformation (space reflection). 

The transformation law of electromagnetic fields under Poincare transformations (as it follows from Maxwell s equations) is almost compatible with the potential transformation law (89). There is a slight mismatch concerning the behavior under the parity transformation. The matrix structure of (91) would require that the fields E and B change their sign under a space reflection, but the electromagnetic field strengths don t. Therefore, the Dirac equation with this potential matrix is not covariant with respect to a parity transformation. 

In order to obtain Poincare-covariance of the Dirac equation, Apy must behave as an electromagnetic vector potential, as far as proper Poincare transformations are concerned. The right behavior under a parity transformation would be... 

It is remarkable that Fermi introduced this essentially correct interaction only two years after the discovery of the neutron and one year after Pauli s hypothesis of the neutrino. Fermi modeled his interaction after QED, with = 7p, but the actual interaction has to be determined by experiment. After a confusing period in which experiments appeared to indicate tensor-type interactions, the so-called V-A theory was developed, which has the remarkable feature of breaking parity invariance. Specifically, one has Fp = 7 (1 — 75), in which the 7 75 part changes sign under a parity transformation. The V-A interaction creates particles with negative helic-ity, which means that, if they have velocities close to the speed of light, their spins are oriented against the direction of motion. 

The parity operator P maps 1—> —r. In spherical coordinates, the operator P transforms < + 7t and 6 7 — 6. Under a parity transformation. 

To estimate uncertainties of this approach we use three different parameteri-zations of the model, namely NL3 [46], NL-Z2 [47] and TMl [48]. In this paper we assume that the antiproton interactions are fully determined by the G-parity transformation. 

Inversion of coordinates, r —> —r, can be formally expressed by the parity operator P. In spherical coordinates, inversion of coordinates reduces to changes of the angles only, r r, f (p + Tt). Q 2K i tt — J . For the spherical harmonics under parity transformation we find... 

The space inversion transformation is x —> —x and the corresponding operator on state vector space is called the parity operator (P). The parity operator reverses... 

If parity is not broken spontaneously, we have (La) = (Ra) = fS3, where we choose the condensate to be in the 3rd direction of color. The order parameters are singlets under the 517 (2) x SUr(2) flavor transformations while possessing baryon charge. The vev leaves invariant the following symmetry group ... 

Then it resides on the chiral circle with modulus p and phase , , any point on which is equivalent with each other in the chiral limit, mc = 0, and moved to another point by a chiral transformation. We conventionally choose a definite point, (vac p vac) = /,T (Jn the pion decay constant) and (vac Oi vac) = 0, for the vacuum, which is flavor singlet and parity eigenstate. In the following we shall see that the phase degree of freedom is related to spin polarization that is, the phase condensation with a non-vanishing value of Oi leads to FM [20]. 

Representation of molecular configuration by parity vectors relates directly to van t Hoff s concept of superposition of asymmetric C-atoms. The transformations... 

Within the Hohenberg-Kohn approach [17, 18], the possibility of transforming density functional theory into a theory fully equivalent to the Schrodinger equation hinges on whether the elusive universal energy functional can ever be found. Unfortunately, the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem, being just an existence theorem, does not provide any indication of how one should proceed in order to find this functional. Moreover, the contention that such a functional should exist - and that it should be the same for systems that have neither the same number of particles nor the same symmetries (for an atom, for example, those symmetries are defined by U, L, S, and the parity operator ft) -certainly opens the door to dubious speculation. 

This section of the appendix is based on Appendix B of Ref 80. It outlines the transformation of the space-fixed form of the continuum wavefunction, Eq. (4.3), to a body-fixed form. It differs from the previous development in that the angular functions used in the final equations are all parity-adapted. 

In order to transform to the body-fixed representation, we will need to relate the angular functions Wj (R,r) to angular functions defined relative to the body-fixed axes [L., J,K,M,p)QjK ), where J,K,M,p) are the parity-adapted total angular momentum eigenfunctions of Eq. (4.5) and x(0) normalized associated Legendre polynomials of the body-fixed Jacobi angle]. 

An extra summation over p has been added as Eq. (A.5) contains a summation over both parities (i.e., Yhi f)- We need to transform the radial functions R) to the body-fixed basis (i.e., from using IXoK). To accomplish this, we... 

Suppose one first considers electric-dipole and magnetic-dipole transitions. As is now well recognized, these are the major contributors to rare-earth absorption and emission spectra. We know that the electric-dipole operator transforms as a polar vector, that is, just as the coordinates (23, 24). This means that it has odd parity under an inversion operation. On the other hand, the magnetic-dipole operator transforms as an axial vector or pseudovector and of course must have even parity (23, 24). 

Now consider fa. We set up the space-fixed and molecule-fixed coordinate systems with a common origin on the internuclear axis, midway between the nuclei, as in Fig. 4.11. (Previously in this chapter, we put the origin at the center of mass, but the difference is of no consequence.) The electronic wave function depends on the electronic spatial and spin coordinates and parametrically on R. The parity operator does not affect spin coordinates, and we shall only be considering transformations of spatial coordinates in this section. 

Note Matrix elements are given in the signed-/ basis. Since the laser prepares and probes acetylene states with a defined parity, an orthogonal transformation is performed on the signed-/-basis states to transform them to a parity basis. See Refs. 1, 3, 6, and 8. 

Fig. 9.7 Fourier transforms of two photon, resonant, excitation spectra of the H atom Balmer series around the ionization limit in a magnetic field of strength B = 6 T, excited through individually selected magnetic substates m = 0 and m = +1 of the n = 2 state to final m states of even parity, (a) m = 0, (b) m = +1 (c) m = +2, plus some admixture ( 25%) of m = 0. The resolution is =0.3 cm-1 (from ref. 22).

Fig. 9.8 Fourier transforms of H spectra obtained in a magnetic field of 5.96 T with resolution 0.07 cm-1 (a) initial state 2p m = 0, final state m = 0 even parity states (b) initial state 2p m = — 1 final state m = — 1 even parity states. The squared value of the absolute value is plotted in both cases. The circled numbers correspond to the classical orbits depicted in Fig. 9.9 (from ref. 23).

We may assign this U 1) group to a chiral transformation, similar to a G parity operator, according to... 

The characters of the MRs for the basis dj can now be written down using the transformation of the second subset of d orbitals given in Table 6.4 and eq. (3). Note that the characters for I), simply change sign in the second half of the table (for the classes I T ) this tells us that it is either a u IR, or a direct sum of u IRs. The characters for both ds and d f simply repeat in the second half of the table, so they are either g IRs, or direct sums of g IRs. This is because the p functions have odd parity and the d functions have even parity. 

In standard quantum field theory, particles are identified as (positive frequency) solutions ijj of the Dirac equation (p — m) fj = 0, with p = y p, m is the rest mass and p the four-momentum operator, and antiparticles (the CP conjugates, where P is parity or spatial inversion) as positive energy (and frequency) solutions of the adjoint equation (p + m) fi = 0. This requires Cq to be linear e u must be transformed into itself. Indeed, the Dirac equation and its adjoint are unitarily equivalent, being linked by a unitary transformation (a sign reversal) of the y matrices. Hence Cq is unitary. 

The coefficients Blk are related to the components of the transition dipole moment in the molecule-fixed system and the 0 are the angular expansion functions defined in (11.5). The dipole moment transforms like a tensor of rank 1 which explains why it is expanded in terms of the angular functions for an angular momentum J = 1. Since its projection on the space-fixed z-axis is independent of the azimuthal angle pn, only functions with M = 0 are allowed. Furthermore, the dipole moment has the parity —1 so that the parameter p is restricted to +1 [remember that the parity is given by (—lj p]. 

Owing to Eq.(258), the action of the parity operator on the Hamiltonian IHl)/ 0 transforms it into and vice-versa, whereas this same operator does not... 

---