Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion Controlled Reactivity

This section presents the results for the observed polarisation phases by investigating the effect of  [Pg.163]

The initial separation of the hydroxyl radicals (using the kinetic parameters listed in Table 5.4), with the results presented in Tables 5.6,5.7, 5.8, 5.9,5.10, 5.11. [Pg.163]

From the results, there appears to be a cross-over period at a spin-relaxation time of 40 ps on the OH radical for all hydroxyl radical separations investigated. Although the experimentally observed polarisation phases can be obtained, it should [Pg.163]

Numbers in bracket indicate the standard error in the intensity Signifies polarisation phases could not be determined within the error limits [Pg.164]


A diffusion-controlled reactive process can be designed wherein the development of the pattern. Figure 4.9, occurs in discrete stages. Let stage I be the triangular pattern defined by the sites 1, 2 and 3 stages II-IV are then... [Pg.287]

Harton, S.E., Stevie, F.A., and Ade, H. (2005) Diffusion-controlled reactive coupling at polymer-polymer interfaces. [Pg.816]

All terms required to calculate firec(a) (probability on going from a to b, undergoing spin relaxation at an earlier instance, reaching the boundary b without reaction) are now calculated, and the complete expression is shown in Eq. (4.143). Whilst the solution to Brec(fl) assumes diffusion controlled reactivity at the surface a, it can be argued that if Brec(6() is negligible for diffusion controlled reactions, then it must also be negligible for partially diffusion controlled reactions as well. [Pg.129]

As the electron spin on the hydroxyl can rapidly re-orient itself within the encounter cage (resulting in reaction), it is acceptable to treat reactions involving the hydroxyl radical using the first method (i.e. reaction takes place upon encounter). Hence, for all calculations presented from hereon (except in Sect. 5.8.2), diffusion controlled reactivity was assumed for reactions OH - - OH and OH+R (i.e. singlet probability at the point of recombination is one) for the R -I- R reaction the singlet component of the wavefunction was interrogated. [Pg.168]

The Langmuir-Hinshelwood picture is essentially that of Fig. XVIII-14. If the process is unimolecular, the species meanders around on the surface until it receives the activation energy to go over to product(s), which then desorb. If the process is bimolecular, two species diffuse around until a reactive encounter occurs. The reaction will be diffusion controlled if it occurs on every encounter (see Ref. 211) the theory of surface diffusional encounters has been treated (see Ref. 212) the subject may also be approached by means of Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics techniques [213]. In the case of activated bimolecular reactions, however, there will in general be many encounters before the reactive one, and the rate law for the surface reaction is generally written by analogy to the mass action law for solutions. That is, for a bimolecular process, the rate is taken to be proportional to the product of the two surface concentrations. It is interesting, however, that essentially the same rate law is obtained if the adsorption is strictly localized and species react only if they happen to adsorb on adjacent sites (note Ref. 214). (The apparent rate law, that is, the rate law in terms of gas pressures, depends on the form of the adsorption isotherm, as discussed in the next section.)... [Pg.722]

The transient radicals produced in reactions of hydroxy radicals with vinyl monomers in aqueous solution have been detected directly by EPR43 439 or UV spectroscopy,440-441 These studies indicate that hydroxy radicals react with monomers and other species at or near the diffusion-controlled limit ( Table 3.7). However, high reactivity does not mean a complete lack of specificity. Hydroxy radicals are electrophilic and trends in the relative reactivity of the hydroxy radicals toward monomers can be explained on this basis/97... [Pg.128]

The reactivity of macromonomers in copolymerizalion is strongly dependent on the particular comonomer-macromonomer pair. Solvent effects and the viscosity of the polymerization medium can also be important. Propagation may become diffusion controlled such that the propagation rate constant and reactivity ratios depend on the molecular weight of the macromonomer and the viscosity or, more accurately, the free volume of the medium. [Pg.401]

The sum of all results is consistent with the formation of both the aryl cation and the aryl radical in the aqueous acid system without copper, and with the dominance of the aryl radical in the presence of copper. The product ratios are also qualitatively consistent with the hypothesis that the reactivity of aryl cations with nucleophiles is close to that of a diffusion-controlled process (see Sec. 8.3), and that aryl radicals have arylation rate constants that are about two orders of magnitude smaller than that for diffusion control (0.4-1.7 X 107 m-1s-1 Kryger et al., 1977 Scaiano and Stewart, 1983). Due to the relatively low yields of these dediazoniations in the pentyl nitrite/benzene systems, no conclusions should be drawn from the results. [Pg.267]

Table 12-2 gives some of Sterba s results for 1-naphthol, resorcinol, 1-methoxy-naphthalene, 3-methoxyphenol and 1,3-dimethoxybenzene. The data in the table show that the 1-naphthoxide ion is 108 times more reactive than the undissociated naphthol, which is 102 times more reactive than 1-methoxynaphthalene. The rate ratios for the monoanion of resorcinol relative to resorcinol, 3-methoxyphenol, and 1,3-dimethoxybenzene are of similar magnitudes. The dissociation of both OH groups of resorcinol gives rise to a rate constant (2.83 X 109 m -1 s-1) which, in our opinion, is probably mixing- or diffusion-controlled (see Sec. 12.9). [Pg.349]

While it is possible that surface defects may be preferentially involved in initial product formation, this has not been experimentally verified for most systems of interest. Such zones of preferred reactivity would, however, be of limited significance as they would soon be covered with the coherent product layer developed by reaction proceeding at all reactant surfaces. The higher temperatures usually employed in kinetic studies of diffusion-controlled reactions do not usually permit the measurements of rates of the initial adsorption and nucleation steps. [Pg.255]

Diffusion control can be particularly important in reactions in which two aromatic substances of differing reactivity are reacting with a deficiency of reagent. The more reactive aromatic will react first and since diffusion is slow compared with the rate of reaction it becomes impoverished in the reaction zone, and ensuing reaction will occur mainly with the less reactive aromatic which is now in large excess. The observed relative reaction rate then comes out to be less than it would otherwise be. It follows that this may also be true even when the aromatics are reacting at considerably less than the encounter rate. [Pg.9]

A minor component, if truly minute, can be discounted as the reactive form. To continue with this example, were KCrQ very, very small, then the bimolecular rate constant would need to be impossibly large to compensate. The maximum rate constant of a bimolecular reaction is limited by the encounter frequency of the solutes. In water at 298 K, the limit is 1010 L mol-1 s"1, the diffusion-controlled limit. This value is derived in Section 9.2. For our immediate purposes, we note that one can discount any proposed bimolecular step with a rate constant that would exceed the diffusion-controlled limit. [Pg.134]

Most of the chemical reactions presented in this book have been studied in homogeneous solutions. This chapter presents a conceptual and theoretical framework for these processes. Some of the matters involve principles, such as diffusion-controlled rates and applications of TST to questions of solvent effects on reactivity. Others have practical components as well, especially those dealing with salt effects and kinetic isotope effects. [Pg.197]

Reaction scheme, defined, 9 Reactions back, 26 branching, 189 chain, 181-182, 187-189 competition, 105. 106 concurrent, 58-64 consecutive, 70, 130 diffusion-controlled, 199-202 elementary, 2, 4, 5, 12, 55 exchange, kinetics of, 55-58, 176 induced, 102 opposing, 49-55 oscillating, 190-192 parallel, 58-64, 129 product-catalyzed, 36-37 reversible, 46-55 termination, 182 trapping, 2, 102, 126 Reactivity, 112 Reactivity pattern, 106 Reactivity-selectivity principle, 238 Relaxation kinetics, 52, 257 -260 Relaxation time, 257 Reorganization energy, 241 Reversible reactions, 46-55 concentration-jump technique for, 52-55... [Pg.280]

First, in composites with high fiber concentrations, there is little matrix in the system that is not near a fiber surface. Inasmuch as polymerization processes are influenced by the diffusion of free radicals from initiators and from reactive sites, and because free radicals can be deactivated when they are intercepted at solid boundaries, the high interfacial area of a prepolymerized composite represents a radically different environment from a conventional bulk polymerization reactor, where solid boundaries are few and very distant from the regions in which most of the polymerization takes place. The polymer molecular weight distribution and cross-link density produced under such diffusion-controlled conditions will differ appreciably from those in bulk polymerizations. [Pg.85]

Other particular theories are confined to diffusion-controlled reactions (109), to the so called cooperative processes (113), in which the reactivity depends on the previous state, or to resistance of semiconductors (102), while those operating with hydrogen bridges (131), steric factors (132), or electrostatic effects (133, 175) are capable of being generalized less or more. [Pg.463]

We have already mentioned the application of supercomputers to biochemical simulations. Internal dynamics may play an Important role In such simulations. An example would be enzyme binding-site fluctuations that modulate reactivity or the dynamics of antigen-antibody association (11). In the specific case of diffusion-controlled processes, molecular recognition may occur because of long-range sterlc effects which are hard to assess without very expensive simulations (12.)-... [Pg.9]

Approximation refers to the bringing together of the substrate molecules and reactive functionalities of the enzyme active site into the required proximity and orientation for rapid reaction. Consider the reaction of two molecules, A and B, to form a covalent product A-B. For this reaction to occur in solution, the two molecules would need to encounter each other through diffusion-controlled collisions. The rate of collision is dependent on the temperature of the solution and molar concentrations of reactants. The physiological conditions that support human life, however, do not allow for significant variations in temperature or molarity of substrates. For a collision to lead to bond formation, the two molecules would need to encounter one another in a precise orientation to effect the molecular orbitial distortions necessary for transition state attainment. The chemical reaction would also require... [Pg.27]

The gel time of a 2000 ppm Flocon 4800 (a Pfizer xanthan polymer) in 2% NaCl solution was measured with various Cr(III) crosslinkers at room temperature (Table II). In this series of experiments Cr(III) concentration was 90 ppm. The most reactive Cr(III) species were dates derived from Cr(N0 )g with one and two equivalents of NaOH. Gels formed within 5 minutes and the reaction rate appeared to be diffusion-controlled. Cr(N03)3 without NaOH required 48 hours to gel the polymer solution. This reflects the time needed to hydrolyze CrCNOg) in Equation 3. [Pg.144]


See other pages where Diffusion Controlled Reactivity is mentioned: [Pg.272]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.326]   


SEARCH



Diffusion control

Diffusion controlled

Reactive diffusion

Reactivity controls

© 2024 chempedia.info