Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion-controlled behavior

Figure 1 shows several voltammetric techniques applied to this compound. At RT the rate of interconversion of the two isomers is in the slow-reaction limit (1 a for CV studies), and peak currents for both waves are proportional to v i.e., diffusion-controlled behavior is observed. At higher T, where the reaction is in the intermediate-kinetic region, the relative peak currents of the waves vary with scan rate. At slower scans the current for the first peak is enhanced owing to the kinetic effect of conversion of the 1,5-isomer to the 1,3-isomer. At fast scans (> 20 V s ) the kinetic effects could be outrun even at elevated T, returning the system to the slow-reaction (fast-scan) limit. ... [Pg.194]

This condition gives diffusion-controlled behavior when 0.886/ A 0.05, or log = 1.25 - (1/2) log A this represents the right boundary (line 2). The pure kinetic region is also defined by large A values, this time as 7 0. One can set the boundary by using A >1.4 (line 3) and the condition that the second term on the right predominates in (12.3.17). Thus 0.886/ A > 10 or log K = —1/2 log A — 1.05 (line 4). Note that the exact locations of these boundaries depend on the levels of approximations used. Moreover, in this pure kinetic region, (12.3.14) becomes... [Pg.494]

Fig. 17 Nyquist plot of the active state of Ni after 670 min of reaction in a N32S04 melt in an 0.1 wt. % SO2-O2 gas mixture at 1200 K. Aiso, diffusion-controlled behavior was observed. Fig. 17 Nyquist plot of the active state of Ni after 670 min of reaction in a N32S04 melt in an 0.1 wt. % SO2-O2 gas mixture at 1200 K. Aiso, diffusion-controlled behavior was observed.
Fig. 18 Nyquist piot of impedance data from FeAl in molten (Li,K)2C03 at 650 °C after 48 h of corrosion, showing a diffusion-controlled behavior in the low-frequency range. Fig. 18 Nyquist piot of impedance data from FeAl in molten (Li,K)2C03 at 650 °C after 48 h of corrosion, showing a diffusion-controlled behavior in the low-frequency range.
FIGURE 5.5 Summary of the key kinetic concepts associated with active gas corrosion under the surface reaction, diffusion, and mixed-control regimes, (a) Schematic iUusIration and corrosion rate equation for active gas corrosion under surface reaction control, (b) Schematic illustration and corrosion rate equation for active gas corrosion under reactant diffusion control. (c) Schematic illustration and corrosion rate equation for active gas corrosion under mixed control, (d) Illustration of the crossover from surface-reaction-conlrolled behavior to diffusion-controlled behavior with increasing temperature. The surface reaction rate constant (k ) is exponentially temperature activated, and hence the surface reaction rate tends to increase rapidly with temperature. On the other hand, the diffusion rate inereases only weakly with temperature. The slowest process determines the overall rate. [Pg.164]

Despite the very restricted circumstances In which these equations properly describe the dynamical behavior, they are the starting point for almost all the extensive literature on the stability of steady states in catalyst pellets. It is therefore Interesting to examine the case of a binary mixture at the opposite limit, where bulk diffusion controls, to see what form the dynamical equations should take in a coarsely porous pellet. [Pg.164]

In section 11.4 Che steady state material balance equations were cast in dimensionless form, therary itancifying a set of independent dimensionless groups which determine ice steady state behavior of the pellet. The same procedure can be applied to the dynamical equations and we will illustrate it by considering the case t f the reaction A - nB at the limit of bulk diffusion control and high permeability, as described by equations (12.29)-(12.31). [Pg.168]

The vapor cloud of evaporated droplets bums like a diffusion flame in the turbulent state rather than as individual droplets. In the core of the spray, where droplets are evaporating, a rich mixture exists and soot formation occurs. Surrounding this core is a rich mixture zone where CO production is high and a flame front exists. Air entrainment completes the combustion, oxidizing CO to CO2 and burning the soot. Soot bumup releases radiant energy and controls flame emissivity. The relatively slow rate of soot burning compared with the rate of oxidation of CO and unbumed hydrocarbons leads to smoke formation. This model of a diffusion-controlled primary flame zone makes it possible to relate fuel chemistry to the behavior of fuels in combustors (7). [Pg.412]

Although there are differences in the approach curves with the constant-composition model, it would be extremely difficult to distinguish between any of the K cases practically, unless K was below 10. Even for K = 10, an uncertainty in the tip position from the interface of 0. d/a would not allow the experimental behavior for this rate constant to be distinguished from the diffusion-controlled case. For a typical value of Z)Red, = 10 cm s and electrode radius, a= 12.5/rm, this corresponds to an effective first-order heterogeneous rate constant of just 0.08 cm s. Assuming K,. > 20 is necessary... [Pg.303]

Mechanisms of dissolution kinetics of crystals have been intensively studied in the pharmaceutical domain, because the rate of dissolution affects the bioavailability of drug crystals. Many efforts have been made to describe the crystal dissolution behavior. A variety of empirical or semi-empirical models have been used to describe drug dissolution or release from formulations [1-6]. Noyes and Whitney published the first quantitative study of the dissolution process in 1897 [7]. They found that the dissolution process is diffusion controlled and involves no chemical reaction. The Noyes-Whitney equation simply states that the dissolution rate is directly proportional to the difference between the solubility and the solution concentration ... [Pg.192]

Mohamed [63] investigated the complexation behavior of amodiaquine and primaquine with Cu(II) by a polarographic method. The reduction process at dropping mercury electrode in aqueous medium is reversible and diffusion controlled, giving well-defined peaks. The cathodic shift in the peak potential (Ep) with increasing ligand concentrations and the trend of the plot of EVl versus log Cx indicate complex formation, probably more than one complex species. The composition and stability constants of the simple complexes formed were determined. The logarithmic stability constants are log Bi = 3.56 log B2 = 3.38, and log B3 = 3.32 [Cu(II)-primaquine at 25 °C]. [Pg.185]

Many transition metal complexes have been considered as synzymes for superoxide anion dismutation and activity as SOD mimics. The stability and toxicity of any metal complex intended for pharmaceutical application is of paramount concern, and the complex must also be determined to be truly catalytic for superoxide ion dismutation. Because the catalytic activity of SOD1, for instance, is essentially diffusion-controlled with rates of 2 x 1 () M 1 s 1, fast analytic techniques must be used to directly measure the decay of superoxide anion in testing complexes as SOD mimics. One needs to distinguish between the uncatalyzed stoichiometric decay of the superoxide anion (second-order kinetic behavior) and true catalytic SOD dismutation (first-order behavior with [O ] [synzyme] and many turnovers of SOD mimic catalytic behavior). Indirect detection methods such as those in which a steady-state concentration of superoxide anion is generated from a xanthine/xanthine oxidase system will not measure catalytic synzyme behavior but instead will evaluate the potential SOD mimic as a stoichiometric superoxide scavenger. Two methodologies, stopped-flow kinetic analysis and pulse radiolysis, are fast methods that will measure SOD mimic catalytic behavior. These methods are briefly described in reference 11 and in Section 3.7.2 of Chapter 3. [Pg.270]

B = 0.80, t, which is a measure of the size of reactor, is about 1.7 min for ash-layer control, 9.5 min for reaction control, and 14.5 min for gas-film control. The relatively favorable behavior for ash-layer diffusion control in this example reflects primarily the low value of (1.67 min versus 6.67 min for the other two cases) imposed. [Pg.564]

Figure 2.29. If the intrinsic barrier for electron transfer is small, the potential range within which the activation control prevails is accordingly narrow and the corresponding asymptote is approximately linear, as represented in the figure, where ks is the standard rate constant (i.e., the rate constant at zero driving force). Under these conditions, redox catalysts that offer a small driving force resulting in counter-diffusion control can be found. This behavior is identified by the value of the slope (F/TIT In 10). The intersection of the counter-diffusion and the diffusion asymptotes provides the value of the standard potential sought, , B. Figure 2.29. If the intrinsic barrier for electron transfer is small, the potential range within which the activation control prevails is accordingly narrow and the corresponding asymptote is approximately linear, as represented in the figure, where ks is the standard rate constant (i.e., the rate constant at zero driving force). Under these conditions, redox catalysts that offer a small driving force resulting in counter-diffusion control can be found. This behavior is identified by the value of the slope (F/TIT In 10). The intersection of the counter-diffusion and the diffusion asymptotes provides the value of the standard potential sought, , B.
During the studies carried out on this process some unusual behavior has been observed. Such results have led some authors to the conclusion that SSP is a diffusion-controlled reaction. Despite this fact, the kinetics of SSP also depend on catalyst, temperature and time. In the later stages of polymerization, and particularly in the case of large particle sizes, diffusion becomes dominant, with the result that the removal of reaction products such as EG, water and acetaldehyde is controlled by the physics of mass transport in the solid state. This transport process is itself dependent on particle size, density, crystal structure, surface conditions and desorption of the reaction products. [Pg.200]

In a detailed rotating-disk electrode study of the characteristic currents were found to be under mixed control, showing kinetic as well as diffusional limitations [Ha3]. While for low HF concentrations (<1 M) kinetic limitations dominate, the regime of high HF concentrations (> 1 M) the currents become mainly diffusion controlled. However, none of the relevant currents (J1 to J4) obeys the Levich equation for any values of cF and pH studied [Etl, Ha3]. According to the Levich equation the electrochemical current at a rotating disk electrode is proportional to the square root of the rotation speed [Le6], Only for HF concentrations below 1 mol 1 1 and a fixed anodic potential of 2.2 V versus SCE the traditional Levich behavior has been reported [Cal 3]. [Pg.59]


See other pages where Diffusion-controlled behavior is mentioned: [Pg.284]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.2251]    [Pg.2251]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.5635]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.2251]    [Pg.2251]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.5635]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.96]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.137 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.137 ]




SEARCH



Behavioral control

Diffusion control

Diffusion controlled

Diffusive behavior

© 2024 chempedia.info