Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion calculations—reaction models

The amount of sedimentary denitrification occurring in the ocean today is one of the most poorly quantified terms in the marine combined nitrogen budget. Most modem measurements of denitrification rate have utilized pore-water N03 profiles (estimated from diffusion calculations—reaction models) whole-sediment incubations, either on deck or in situ, or by the isotope paring technique. It appears that shelf and upper slope sediments are quantitatively the most important sites of sedimentary denitrification (Christensen, et al., 1996 Christensen et al., 1987 Devol, 1991 Devol and Christensen, 1993 Gruber and Sarmiento, 1997 Kristensen, et al., 1999 Middelburg et al., 1996). Typical denitrification rates in these areas... [Pg.290]

In laminar flow stirred tanks, the packet diffusion model is replaced by a slab-diffusion model. The diffusion and reaction calculations are similar to those for the turbulent flow case. Again, the conclusion is that perfect mixing is almost always a good approximation. [Pg.574]

Burns and Curtiss (1972) and Burns et al. (1984) have used the Facsimile program developed at AERE, Harwell to obtain a numerical solution of simultaneous partial differential equations of diffusion kinetics (see Eq. 7.1). In this procedure, the changes in the number of reactant species in concentric shells (spherical or cylindrical) by diffusion and reaction are calculated by a march of steps method. A very similar procedure has been adopted by Pimblott and La Verne (1990 La Verne and Pimblott, 1991). Later, Pimblott et al. (1996) analyzed carefully the relationship between the electron scavenging yield and the time dependence of eh yield through the Laplace transform, an idea first suggested by Balkas et al. (1970). These authors corrected for the artifactual effects of the experiments on eh decay and took into account the more recent data of Chernovitz and Jonah (1988). Their analysis raises the yield of eh at 100 ps to 4.8, in conformity with the value of Sumiyoshi et al. (1985). They also conclude that the time dependence of the eh yield and the yield of electron scavenging conform to each other through Laplace transform, but that neither is predicted correctly by the diffusion-kinetic model of water radiolysis. [Pg.219]

The ratio vJD can then be used to calculate a chemical reaction rate for a nonconservative solute, S. To do this, the one-dimensional advection-diffusion model is modified to include a chemical reaction term, J. This new equation is called the one-dimensional advection-diffusion-reaction model and has the following form ... [Pg.99]

Gifford and Hanna tested their simple box model for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide predictions for annual or seasonal averages against diffusion-model predictions. Their conclusions are summarized in Table 5-3. The correlation coefficient of observed concentrations versus calculated concentrations is generally higher for the simple model than for the detailed model. Hanna calculated reactions over a 6-h period on September 30, 1%9, with his chemically reactive adaptation of the simple dispersion model. He obtained correlation coefficients of observed and calculated concentrations as follows nitric oxide, 0.97 nitrogen dioxide, 0.05 and rhc, 0.55. He found a correlation coefficient of 0.48 of observed ozone concentration with an ozone predictor derived from a simple model, but he pointed out that the local inverse wind speed had a correlation of 0.66 with ozone concentration. He derived a critical wind speed formula to define a speed below which ozone prediction will be a problem with the simple model. Further performance of the simple box model compared with more detailed models is discussed later. [Pg.226]

Calculated reaction rates can be in the spatially ID model corrected using the generalized effectiveness factor (rf) approach for non-linear rate laws. The effect of internal diffusion limitations on the apparent reaction rate Reff is then lumped into the parameter evaluated in dependence on Dc>r, 8 and Rj (cf. Aris, 1975 Froment and Bischoff, 1979, 1990 Leclerc and Schweich, 1993). [Pg.118]

On the other hand, it is clear that the "ideal models cannot describe the behaviour of complex catalytic reactions in complete detail. In particular, we cannot quantitatively explain the values of the self-oscillation periods obtained by Orlik et al. Secondly, for example, we have failed to describe the critical effects obtained by Barelko et al. in terms of model (2)—(3) corresponding to the two-route mechanism with the parameters taken from ref. 49 or ref. 142. Our calculated reaction rates proved to be at least two orders of magnitude higher than the experimental values. Apparently our models must be considerably modified, primarily in the region of normal pressures. It is necessary to take into account the formation of unreactive oxygen forms that considerably decrease the rate of C02 generation, the dependence of the reaction parameters on the surface composition and catalyst volume and finally the diffusion of oxygen into the catalyst. [Pg.356]

Analysis of structure formation processes by using Monte Carlo methods. Monte Carlo methods will he used extensively for the calculation of processes during which new phases are formed. In particular, these are adsorption-desorption, diffusion, and reactions on the surfaces of solids. The results of this modelling will be used to decode structures formed on catalyst surfaces. [Pg.386]

In rate-based multistage separation models, separate balance equations are written for each distinct phase, and mass and heat transfer resistances are considered according to the two-film theory with explicit calculation of interfacial fluxes and film discretization for non-homogeneous film layer. The film model equations are combined with relevant diffusion and reaction kinetics and account for the specific features of electrolyte solution chemistry, electrolyte thermodynamics, and electroneutrality in the liquid phase. [Pg.141]

This simple analysis is semi empirical it is not a description of the diffusion limited reaction within the crystals but allows one to take into account both phenomena, in order to provide kinetic models for FCC reactor description [11]. Experimental results on the three feedstocks are shown in figure 1, with the deactivation function determined according to the method described in [10]. Curves are calculated from equation (3) after fitting E and F. These values are reported in table 2. [Pg.251]

The value of /cro depends on the frequency of diffusion jumps, and thus on the rate of diffusion, similar to ka. This model was used by Rabinovich [42] as a basis in rate constant calculations of diffusion-controlled reactions its variant for the reactions of large and small molecules was used by Allen and Patrick [13]. Another very well known, and actually the first approach, is the treatment of this problem by Smoluchowski and his successors [41, 44-48]. [Pg.249]

When gum formation proceeds, the minimum temperature in the catalyst bed decreases with time. This could be explained by a shift in the reaction mechanism so more endothermic reaction steps are prevailing. The decrease in the bed temperature speeds up the deactivation by gum formation. This aspect of gum formation is also seen on the temperature profiles in Figure 9. Calculations with a heterogenous reactor model have shown that the decreasing minimum catalyst bed temperature could also be explained by a change of the effectiveness factors for the reactions. The radial poisoning profiles in the catalyst pellets influence the complex interaction between pore diffusion and reaction rates and this results in a shift in the overall balance between endothermic and exothermic reactions. [Pg.196]

The microstructural models described here represent theoretical milestones in gasless combustion. Using similar approaches, other models have also been developed. For example, Makino and Law (1994) used the solid-liquid model (Fig. 20c) to determine the combustion velocity as a function of stoichiometry, degree of dilution, and initial particle size. Calculations for a variety of systems compared favorably with experimental data. In addition, an analytical solution was developed for diffusion-controlled reactions, which accounted for changes in X, p, and Cp within the combustion wave, and led to the conclusion that U< Ud(Lak-shmikantha and Sekhar, 1993). [Pg.130]

Reuter, Frenkel, and Scheffler have recently used DFT-based calculations to predict the CO turnover frequency on RuO2(110) as a function of 02 pressure, CO pressure, and temperature.31 This was an ambitious undertaking, and as we will see below, remarkably successful. Much of this work was motivated by the earlier success of ab initio thermodynamics, a topic that is reviewed more fully below in section 3.1. The goal of Reuter et al. s work was to derive a lattice model for adsorption, dissociation, surface diffusion, surface reaction, and desorption on defect-free Ru02(l 10) in which the rates of each elementary step were calculated from DFT via transition state theory (TST). As mentioned above, experimental evidence strongly indicates that surface defects do not play a dominant role in this system, so neglecting them entirely is a reasonable approach. The DFT calculations were performed using a GGA full-potential... [Pg.111]

Recent models take into account not only the nature of the saliva film and its composition but also the diffusion and reaction of salivary components within plaque, metabolic processes of plaque bacteria, salivary and plaque buffering, Ca2+ ion binding, etc. Earlier work [18] had emphasised the role of plaque thickness on the shape of the Stephan curve for a given sucrose pulse, minimum pH values at the enamel/plaque interface were predicted to be lowest for plaques of thickness intermediate between thin (0.1 pan) and thick (2 xm) plaques. The more recent calculations, whilst generating deeper and more prolonged pH falls, have shown that these differences remain important [19]. [Pg.138]

Mathematical difficulties forced Kramers to restrict his discussion. to the case in which the barrier height Q = EMt is large compared to the mean thermal energy of the molecules kT and in which the diffusion over the barrier can be treated as a quasi-stationary process. Kramers showed that under these conditions the calculated reaction rate is very close to the equilibrium rate, as given by absolute rate theory, and that for E/kT > 10 the rate calculated from his model agrees with the equilibrium rate to within about 10 per cent over a rather wide range of rj. [Pg.366]

The validity of both the immobilized Km and the model of simultaneous diffusion and reaction was examined by comparing the experimental data with predictions. At each substrate concentration, an effectiveness factor, 7], using the experimentally observed reaction rate and the Km was calculated from... [Pg.30]

While the Gaussian equations have been widely used for atmospheric diffusion calculations, the lack of ability to include changes in windspeed with height and nonlinear chemical reactions limits the situations in which they may be used. The atmospheric diffusion equation provides a more general approach to atmospheric diffusion calculations than do the Gaussian models, since the Gaussian models have been shown to be special cases of that equation when the windspeed is uniform and the eddy diffusivities are constant. The atmospheric diffusion equation in the absence of chemical reaction is... [Pg.869]


See other pages where Diffusion calculations—reaction models is mentioned: [Pg.214]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.42]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.290 ]




SEARCH



Calculations reactions

Diffusion calculations

Diffusion reactions

Diffusion-reaction model

Diffusivities calculation

Diffusivity reactions

Model calculations

© 2024 chempedia.info