Difference instability

What thus really makes one dimension so peculiar resides in the fact that the symmetry of the spectrum for the Cooper and Peierls instabilities refer to the same phase space of electronic states [108]. The two different kinds of pairing act as independent and simultaneous processes of the electron-electron scattering amplitude which interfere with and distort each other at all order of perturbation theory. What comes out of this interference is neither a BCS superconductor nor a Peierls/density-wave superstructure but a different instability of the Fermi liquid called a Luttinger liquid. 

Fig. 1.1 Illustrative images of the surface patterns obtained by using different instability-based patterning approaches (a) Structuration driven by surface mterfacial energy [1-5] (b) Field-induced structuration [6-12] (c) Influence of water on hydrophobic polymer surfaces...

The main problem is the competition between these different instabilities. A departure from ideal 1-D situation, by increasing the transverse interactions, will suppress the Peierls state, as described by a mean-field approach [29]. Nevertheless, this description does not strictly apply to these low-dimensional systems, where large fluctuative regimes are present, as observed by diffuse X ray techniques [13,30]. 

In both the cases considered, an optical contrast of the patterns observed in isotropic liquids is very small. Certainly, the anisotropy of Uquid crystals brings new features in. For instance, the anisotropy of (helectric or diamagnetic susceptibility causes the Fredericks transition in nematics and wave like instabilities in cholesterics (see next Section), and the flexoelectric polarizaticm results in the field-controllable domain patterns. In turn, the anisotropy of electric conductivity is responsible for instability in the form of rolls to be discussed below. All these instabilities are not observed in the isotropic liquids and have an electric field threshold controlled by the corresponding parameters of anisotropy. In addition, due to the optical anisotropy, the contrast of the patterns that are driven by isotropic mechanisms , i.e. only indirectly dependent on anisotropy parameters, increases dramatically. Thanks to this, one can easily study specific features and mechanisms of different instability modes, both isotropic and anisotropic. The characteristic pattern formation is a special branch of physics dealing with a nonlinear response of dissipative media to external fields, and liquid crystals are suitable model objects for investigation of the relevant phenomena [39]. 

When immiscible fluid streams are contacted at the inlet section of a microchannel network, the ultimate flow regime depends on the geometry of the microchannel, the flow rates and instabilities that occur at the fluid-fluid interface. In microfluidic systems, flow instabilities provide a passive means for co-flowing fluid streams to increase the interfacial area between them and form, e.g. by an unstable fluid interface that disintegrates into droplets or bubbles. Because of the low Reynolds numbers involved, viscous instabilities are very important At very high flow rates, however, inertial forces become influential as well. In the following, we discuss different instabilities that either lead to drop/bubble breakup or at least deform an initially flat fluid-fluid interface. Many important phenomena relate to classical work on the stability of unbounded viscous flows (see e.g. the textbooks by Drazin and Reid[56]and Chandrasekhar [57]). We will see, however, that flow confinement provides a number of new effects that are not yet fully understood and remain active research topics. 

However, there is a different instability between these two disubstituted alkenes. An E-alkene tends to be lower in energy than a Z-alkene due to diminished steric interactions. In other words, the methyl and ethyl groups in 19 are closer together and, because there is no rotation about a C=C bond, that steric interaction is greater than the methyl-H or ethyl-H interactions found in 18. Because alkene 18 is lower in energy than 19, that transition state should be more favorable and 18 shoidd form faster via the E2 mechanism. It is therefore anticipated that both 18 and 19 are formed, but 18 wiU be the major product. 

Classification of Threshold Conditions for Different Instabilities in Nematics... 

For a given conduction-diffusion system, therefore, the balance between these two effects determines the overall local stability to spatial perturbation. If the conductive influences are dominant, the planar front will be stable. This arises if the thermal diffusivity is greater than the molecular diffusion coefficient, i.e., if the Lewis number (Le) is less than unity. Instability and the growth of flame curvature occurs under the opposite conditions, when molecular diffusion is dominant and (Le) > 1. This latter situation can arise with light, mobile fuels such as H2 or if light, mobile chain carriers such as H-atoms are produced (lean hydrocarbon flames have (Le) < 1 rich flames have (Le) >1). The effect of this instability is to produce cellular flames. (It should also be mentioned that a different instability, leading to oscillatory flame speeds, can arise for (Le) < 1.)... 

The physical properties of the molecular CT salts and more specifically of the RISs are mainly determined by two basic sets of criteria. These are the conditions needed to observe a metallic state at around room temperature and the existence of different instabilities giving rise at lower temperatures to various possible ground states. 

In chapter 8, it will be shown that in systems with constant coefficient of friction, there are situations where a different instability mechanism can lead to negative damping instability. 

Because the core flow responds to changes in power the stability of a natural-circulation BWR is somewhat different from the stability of a forced-circulation BWR. Therefore, the stability of a natural-circulation BWR requires special attention. It has been shown that two different instability types exist for such a reactor, denoted by type-I and type-II [4]. Type-I oscillations are typical for natural-circulation BWRs and are driven by the gravitational pressure drop over the core and riser. Type-II oscillations are driven by the interplay between single-phase and two-phase friction in the core. This division in different types is not sharp. The transition from one type to the other occurs gradually. Although the character of both types of oscillations is different one could describe both of them as density-wave oscillations. 

---