Dielectric formalism

K s> mentioned earlier, these formulations are applicable to structureless particles (bare ions). The only one of them that may be easily extended to complex ions is the perturbative formulation, either in the form of Bethe s theory for atomic targets or Lindhard s theory (dielectric formalism, DF) for the electron gas model. In addition, a comprehensive semiclassical approach, which extends the Bohr model to complex ions, has been developed more recently by Sigmund et al. [26]. 

The first computations of ionization constants of residues in proteins for structures derived from molecular dynamics trajectories were described by Wendoloski and Matthew for tuna cytochrome c. In that study, conformers were generated using molecular dynamics simulations with a range of solvents, simulating macroscopic dielectric formalisms, and one solvent model that explicitly included solvent water molecules. The authors calculated individual pR values, overall titration curves, and electrostatic potential surfaces for average structures and structures along each simulation trajectory. However, the computational scheme for predicting electrostatic interactions in proteins used by Wendoloski and Matthew was not based on a FDPB model but on the modified Tanford-Kirkwood approach, which is not discussed in this chapter. 

Another way of calculating the electrostatic component of solvation uses the Poisson-Boltzmann equations [22, 23]. This formalism, which is also frequently applied to biological macromolecules, treats the solvent as a high-dielectric continuum, whereas the solute is considered as an array of point charges in a constant, low-dielectric medium. Changes of the potential within a medium with the dielectric constant e can be related to the charge density p according to the Poisson equation (Eq. (41)). 

Formal Theory A small neutral particle at equihbrium in a static elecdric field experiences a net force due to DEP that can be written as F = (p V)E, where p is the dipole moment vecdor and E is the external electric field. If the particle is a simple dielectric and is isotropically, linearly, and homogeneously polarizable, then the dipole moment can be written as p = ai E, where a is the (scalar) polarizability, V is the volume of the particle, and E is the external field. The force can then be written as ... 

In addition to chemical reactions, the isokinetic relationship can be applied to various physical processes accompanied by enthalpy change. Correlations of this kind were found between enthalpies and entropies of solution (20, 83-92), vaporization (86, 91), sublimation (93, 94), desorption (95), and diffusion (96, 97) and between the two parameters characterizing the temperature dependence of thermochromic transitions (98). A kind of isokinetic relationship was claimed even for enthalpy and entropy of pure substances when relative values referred to those at 298° K are used (99). Enthalpies and entropies of intermolecular interaction were correlated for solutions, pure liquids, and crystals (6). Quite generally, for any temperature-dependent physical quantity, the activation parameters can be computed in a formal way, and correlations between them have been observed for dielectric absorption (100) and resistance of semiconductors (101-105) or fluidity (40, 106). On the other hand, the isokinetic relationship seems to hold in reactions of widely different kinds, starting from elementary processes in the gas phase (107) and including recombination reactions in the solid phase (108), polymerization reactions (109), and inorganic complex formation (110-112), up to such biochemical reactions as denaturation of proteins (113) and even such biological processes as hemolysis of erythrocytes (114). 

Application of the formalism of the impulse approximation to the double differential cross section in terms of the dielectric response (Equation 12), that is, using free-electron-like final states E = p+q 2/2m in the calculation ofU(p+q, E +7ko)... 

The SCRF approach became a standard tool167 for estimating solvent effects and was combined with various quantum chemical methods that range from semi-empirical161 to the post-Hartree-Fock ab initio ones. It can also be combined with the Kohn-Sham formalism where the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian (Eq. 4.2) is used for the gas-phase Hamiltonian in Eq. 4.15. The effective Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian for the system embedded in the dielectric environment takes the following form ... 

In this section, we discuss applications of the FEP formalism to two systems and examine the validity of the second-order perturbation approximation in these cases. Although both systems are very simple, they are prototypes for many other systems encountered in chemical and biological applications. Furthermore, the results obtained in these examples provide a connection between molecular-level simulations and approximate theories, especially those based on a dielectric continuum representation of the solvent. 

Coulomb s law describes the charge-charge interaction energy (Equation 15). It is used in MM3 for the calculation of two charges interacting with one another. This term is used to calculate ionic interactions. The variables qA and qB are the formal charges on atoms A and B, respectively. The distance between the two atoms is r, and the dielectric constant is D. 

The transfer matrix formalism enables us to find the modal field profile in the case of an arbitrary arrangement of annular concentric dielectric rings. However, we are especially interested in structures that can confine the modal energy near a predetermined radial distance, i.e. within the defect. 

Various components of the interactions are calculated using different formalisms. In fact, the shape and size of the cavity are defined differently in various versions of the continuum models. It is generally accepted that the cavity shape should reproduce that of the molecule. The simplest cavity is spherical or ellipsoidal. Computations are simpler and faster when simple molecular shapes are used. In Bom model, with simplest spherical reaction held, the free energy of difference between vacuum and a medium with a dielectric constant is given as [16]... 

We have investigated the ferrocene/ferrocenium ion exchange to determine the effects of different solvents on electron-transfer rates. There is probably only a very small work term and very little internal rearrangement in this system. Thus the rates should reflect mostly the solvent reorganization about the reactants, the outer-sphere effect. We measured the exchange rates in a number of different solvents and did not find the dependence on the macroscopic dielectric constants predicted by the simple model [Yang, E. S. Chan, M.-S. Wahl, A. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 3094]. Very little difference was found for different solvents, indicating either that the formalism is incorrect or that the microscopic values of the dielectric constants are not the same as the macroscopic ones. 

---