Detector Determinate errors

Indeterminate errors are errors that cannot be eliminated and are inherent in the analytical technique. Determinate errors are errors whose cause and magnitude can be determined, and they include poor sampling technique, decomposition of the column, change in detector response, improper recorder performance, calculation errors, and operator prejudice or error. 

The first of them to determine the LMA quantitatively and the second - the LF qualitatively Of course, limit of sensitivity of the LF channel depends on the rope type and on its state very close because the LF are detected by signal pulses exceeding over a noise level. The level is less for new ropes (especially for the locked coil ropes) than for multi-strand ropes used (especially for the ropes corroded). Even if a skilled and experienced operator interprets a record, this cannot exclude possible errors completely because of the evaluation subjectivity. Moreover it takes a lot of time for the interpretation. Some of flaw detector producers understand the problem and are intended to develop new instruments using data processing by a computer [6]. 

One cm3 of the reactant/product/catalyst mixture was sampled periodically during the reaction for the transmission infrared analysis (Nicolet Magna 550 Series II infrared spectrometer with a MCT detector). The concentrations of reactants and products were obtained by multiplying integrated absorbance of each species by its molar extinction coefficient. The molar extinction coefficient was determined from the slope of a calibration curve, a plot of the peak area versus the number of moles of the reagent in the IR cell. The reaction on each catalyst was repeated and the relative error for the carbamate yield measured by IR is within 5%. 

Our first chapter in this set [4] was an overview the next six examined the effects of noise when the noise was due to constant detector noise, and the last one on the list is the first of the chapters dealing with the effects of noise when the noise is due to detectors, such as photomultipliers, that are shot-noise-limited, so that the detector noise is Poisson-distributed and therefore the standard deviation of the noise equals the square root of the signal level. We continue along this line in the same manner we did previously by finding the proper expression to describe the relative error of the absorbance, which by virtue of Beer s law also describes the relative error of the concentration as determined by the spectrometric readings, and from that determine the... 

On other hand, we found a good correlation between the results by the present method and those by the Terradex detector. However, the mean value obtained by the Terradex detector were about twice those by the present method. The reasons for this significant difference are unknown and may be due to errors in the calibration experiments and in the conditions during the measurements. In the calibration experiments the effect of existence of thoron in the chambers could be one of the reasons. As regards the condition in the measurements, methods for subtraction of background tracks and deposition of dust onto the bare detector could be candidates. However, we do not have enough data to determine the reasons for some of this difference. 

How to best describe this broadening we expect to occur One way is by analogy to random error in measurements. We know or assume there is a truly correct answer to any measurement of quantity present and attempt to determine that number. In real measurements there are real, if random, sources of error. It is convenient to talk about standard deviation of the measurement but actually the error in measurement accumulates as the sum of the square of each error process or variance producing mechanism or total variance = sum of the individual variances. If we ignore effects outside the actual separation process (e.g. injection/spot size, connecting tubing, detector volume), this sum can be factored into three main influences ... 

Handle floor-plan questions in the same manner as those on maps. Before attempting to answer any questions, look at the diagram. Familiarize yourself with such features as doors, windows, doorways, patio doors, fire extinguishers, and smoke detectors. Read each question carefully then return to the diagram to find the answer. After you have determined your answer, try to match it to the choices. The correct answer should be apparent, but read each choice carefully to avoid making unnecessary errors. Never jump at one option without carefully reading all the others. 

---