Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Deposition mercury

Studies of the electrodeposition of mercury chalcogenides are scarce, primarily because of the difference in electrochemical potentials needed to deposit mercury and the chalcogens. Mercury is a noble metal the standard redox potential for the... [Pg.106]

The additivity principle was well obeyed on adding the voltammograms of the two redox couples involved even though the initially reduced platinum surface had become covered by a small number of underpotential-deposited mercury monolayers. With an initially anodized platinum disk the catalytic rates were much smaller, although the decrease was less if the Hg(I) solution had been added to the reaction vessel before the Ce(lV) solution. The reason was partial reduction by Hg(l) of the ox-ide/hydroxide layer, so partly converting the surface to the reduced state on which catalysis was greater. [Pg.8]

Hintelmann H, St. Louis V, Scott K, Rudd J, Lindberg SE, Krabbenhoft D, Kelly C, Heyes A, Harris R, Hurley J. 2002. Reactivity and mobility of newly deposited mercury in a Boreal catchment. Environ Sci Technol 36 5034-5040. [Pg.43]

The electrodes usually consist of mercury or deposited mercury or occasionally of inert solid material further, they are mainly of a stationary type (in the stripping step as the crucial analytical measurement, but not in the concentration step, where often the solution is stirred or the electrode is rotated). Considering the mercury, only exceptionally has a sessile mercury drop electrode (SMDE)91 or a slowly growing DME(drop time 18 min and phase-selective recording of stripping curve)92 been applied. Most popular are the hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE) and the mercury film or thin-film electrode (MFE or MTFE). [Pg.193]

The following issues are here discussed in depth ecosystem-dependent depositions, speciation of mercury depositions, mercury concentrations in precipitation. One of the... [Pg.375]

Mercury is also found in black metacinnabar and mercury chloride. Small hquid droplets of mercury may be visible in high-grade deposits. Mercury ores are also found in Algeria, Mexico, Bosnia, and Canada as well as in Spain and California. [Pg.169]

The distilled product slowly deposits mercury. In an effort to determine whether extent of this deposition is reduced by extending the time of reduction, the checkers found that stirring the crude alcohol with Celite for 15 hours, followed by filtration and distillation, did not diminish the amount of mercury deposited. However, in a typical run where the yield of distilled alcohol was 24.6 g. (72.0%), after standing for 24 hours, the distillate was decanted from the deposited mercury and redistilled to give 21.4 g. of 1-methylcyclohexanol which did not deposit mercury upon standing for one week at room temperature. The yield of twice-distilled alcohol was 02.6%. [Pg.95]

Electrode. Preparation and Behaviour of Continuously Deposited Mercury Coatings and Applications to Stripping Analysis. Anal Chem. 33, 1201 (1961). [Pg.147]

Potentiometric stripping analysis (PSA) is another commonly used technique in water analysis. This technique can usually be applied directly to the analysis of water samples without previous treatment, and it is virtually free from interferences of dissolved oxygen. Both, PSA and ASV techniques are based on the same principle the anal) e is first deposited on the electrode surface while the solution is stirred, and then stripped back to the solution in the measurement step [14,22,196]. The ASV technique works on a film electrode (electrochemically deposited mercury or gold on a glassy carbon support). One advantage of PSA is that it requires simpler equipment than ASV, and can compete with nonelectroanalytical techniques in terms of price, and possibility of automation [247-249]. This method has been applied to determine metals in tap water and rainwater samples [250-253], coupled with FIA to determine copper in natural waters [254,255], etc. In addition, portable PSA instruments have also been developed, and demonstrated to be useful for metals determination in aquatic samples [256-259]. [Pg.289]

Time of deposition Mercury content Lead content ... [Pg.65]

Stia counter — Mercury coulomb meter invented by Friedrich Otto Schott (1851-1935). In a closed glass tube a mercury drop contacted by a metal wire sealed into the end of the tube is used as an anode, a piece of graphite or more recently another wire sealed into the other end of the tube serves as cathode. Upon ffow of a direct (DC) current mercury is dissolved into the aqueous electrolyte solution containing KCl and Hgl and deposited at the cathode. A porous diaphragm prevents metallic drops of mercury to reach the anode. According to Faradays law the amount of deposited mercury... [Pg.640]

Though R2Hg is thermodynamically unstable with respect to decomposition to mercury and hydrocarbons, dimethylmercury is stable indefinitely at room temperature. The other dialkyls decompose, sometimes slowly, depositing mercury. The diaryls are usually stable indefinitely at room temperature. Those whose crystal structure has been determined all contain C—Hg—C bonds which are collinear or nearly so, an example being shown in Figure 19. [Pg.68]

The initial deposition experiments were done from ethanol solution of thiols. From these experiments we learned the general behavior of the shape of the drop upon compression. However, the uncertainty about the amount of the residud solution near the neck of the drop made us to change to vapor deposition for the set of results reported in this paper. Octanethiol was deposited from the vapor phase onto the mercury surface from a piece of cotton wrapped around a wooden stick wetted with liquid thiol. It was held approximately 1 cm away from the mercury drop, under an inverted beaker. Deposition times before STM imaging varied, ranging from 30 seconds to 2 minutes. STM imaging was performed on a clean mercury drop, on mercury drops after thiol deposition of varying time lengths, and on thiol-deposited mercury drops after compression. [Pg.179]

Figure 6. STM images of the same location on an octanethiol-deposited mercury drop. The octanethiol vapor deposition time was 45 seconds, and the time between the beginning of each image is 20 seconds. The fast and slow scanning directions are shown horizontally and vertically, respectively. The imaging conditions are bias voltage=2.9 V and scan frequency=39 Hz. Figure 6. STM images of the same location on an octanethiol-deposited mercury drop. The octanethiol vapor deposition time was 45 seconds, and the time between the beginning of each image is 20 seconds. The fast and slow scanning directions are shown horizontally and vertically, respectively. The imaging conditions are bias voltage=2.9 V and scan frequency=39 Hz.

See other pages where Deposition mercury is mentioned: [Pg.221]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.954]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.182]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.181 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info