Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Density profile solutions

Fig. Ill-13. (a) Plots of molecular density versus distance normal to the interface a is molecular diameter. Upper plot a dielectric liquid. Lower plot as calculated for liquid mercury. (From Ref. 122.) (b) Equilibrium density profiles for atoms A and B in a rare-gas-like mixmre for which o,bb/ o,aa = 0.4 and q,ab is given by Eq. III-56. Atoms A and B have the same a (of Eq. m-46) and the same molecular weight of SO g/mol the solution mole fraction is jcb = 0.047. Note the strong adsorption of B at the interface. [Reprinted with permission from D. J. Lee, M. M. Telo de Gama, and K. E. Gubbins, J. Phys. Chem., 89, 1514 (1985) (Ref. 88). Copyright 1985, American Chemical Society.]... Fig. Ill-13. (a) Plots of molecular density versus distance normal to the interface a is molecular diameter. Upper plot a dielectric liquid. Lower plot as calculated for liquid mercury. (From Ref. 122.) (b) Equilibrium density profiles for atoms A and B in a rare-gas-like mixmre for which o,bb/ o,aa = 0.4 and q,ab is given by Eq. III-56. Atoms A and B have the same a (of Eq. m-46) and the same molecular weight of SO g/mol the solution mole fraction is jcb = 0.047. Note the strong adsorption of B at the interface. [Reprinted with permission from D. J. Lee, M. M. Telo de Gama, and K. E. Gubbins, J. Phys. Chem., 89, 1514 (1985) (Ref. 88). Copyright 1985, American Chemical Society.]...
The present chapter is organized as follows. We focus first on a simple model of a nonuniform associating fluid with spherically symmetric associative forces between species. This model serves us to demonstrate the application of so-called first-order (singlet) and second-order (pair) integral equations for the density profile. Some examples of the solution of these equations for associating fluids in contact with structureless and crystalline solid surfaces are presented. Then we discuss one version of the density functional theory for a model of associating hard spheres. All aforementioned issues are discussed in Sec. II. [Pg.170]

A set of equations (15)-(17) represents the background of the so-called second-order or pair theory. If these equations are supplemented by an approximate relation between direct and pair correlation functions the problem becomes complete. Its numerical solution provides not only the density profile but also the pair correlation functions for a nonuniform fluid [55-58]. In the majority of previous studies of inhomogeneous simple fluids, the inhomogeneous Percus-Yevick approximation (PY2) has been used. It reads... [Pg.175]

Let us begin our discussion from the model of Cummings and Stell for heterogeneous dimerization a + P ap described in some detail above. In the case of singlet-level equations, HNCl or PYl, the direct correlation function of the bulk fluid c (r) represents the only input necessary to obtain the density profiles from the HNCl and PYl equations see Eqs. (6) and (7) in Sec. II A. It is worth noting that the transformation of a square-well, short-range attraction, see Eq. (36), into a 6-type associative interaction, see Eq. (39), is unnecessary unless one seeks an analytic solution. The 6-type term must be treated analytically while solving the HNCl... [Pg.180]

To the best of our knowledge, there was only one attempt to consider inhomogeneous fluids adsorbed in disordered porous media [31] before our recent studies [32,33]. Inhomogeneous rephca Ornstein-Zernike equations, complemented by either the Born-Green-Yvon (BGY) or the Lovett-Mou-Buff-Wertheim (LMBW) equation for density profiles, have been proposed to study adsorption of a fluid near a plane boundary of a disordered matrix, which has been assumed uniform in a half-space [31]. However, the theory has not been complemented by any numerical solution. Our main goal is to consider a simple model for adsorption of a simple fluid in confined porous media and to solve it. In this section we follow our previously reported work [32,33]. [Pg.330]

FIG. 8 Density profiles p z) and running integrals n z) of the ion densities for cations (full lines) and anions (dashed lines) at three different surface charge densities in units of pC cm as indicated. Left NaCl solutions right CsF solutions. [Pg.366]

Fig. 10 shows the radial particle densities, electrolyte solutions in nonpolar pores. Fig. 11 the corresponding data for electrolyte solutions in functionalized pores with immobile point charges on the cylinder surface. All ion density profiles in the nonpolar pores show a clear preference for the interior of the pore. The ions avoid the pore surface, a consequence of the tendency to form complete hydration shells. The ionic distribution is analogous to the one of electrolytes near planar nonpolar surfaces or near the liquid/gas interface (vide supra). [Pg.370]

The simulations to investigate electro-osmosis were carried out using the molecular dynamics method of Murad and Powles [22] described earher. For nonionic polar fluids the solvent molecule was modeled as a rigid homo-nuclear diatomic with charges q and —q on the two active LJ sites. The solute molecules were modeled as spherical LJ particles [26], as were the molecules that constituted the single molecular layer membrane. The effect of uniform external fields with directions either perpendicular to the membrane or along the diagonal direction (i.e. Ex = Ey = E ) was monitored. The simulation system is shown in Fig. 2. The density profiles, mean squared displacement, and movement of the solvent molecules across the membrane were examined, with and without an external held, to establish whether electro-osmosis can take place in polar systems. The results clearly estab-hshed that electro-osmosis can indeed take place in such solutions. [Pg.786]

FIG. 8 Density profiles in a 4 m aqueous NaCl solution at 25°C. The semi-permeable membranes are at about 5 and 15 [25]. [Pg.791]

The main problem is to find the free energy of the real interface with nonlocal energetic and entropic effects. For a general multicomponent interface the minimization of the nonlocal HS-B2-functional is a nontrivial numerical problem. Fortunately, the variational nature of the problem lends itself to a stepwise solution where simple para-metrization of the density profiles through the interface upon integration of the functional yields the free energy as a function of the parameters. In fact, if we take the profile to be a step function as in the case of local free energy then with local entropy we get the result... [Pg.105]

Previously derived results for the charge-density profile and polarization profile in this model solution, valid only for small fields, were used. Although these did not consider the penetration of the electrons into the solution, the change in the field is small. A Harrison-type pseudopotential84 was used to represent the effect of core electrons of the solution species on the metal electrons. [Pg.82]

A concise approach for the analysis of isotropic scattering curves of spherical and cylindrical particles with a radial density profile has been developed by Burger [207], In practice it is useful for the study of latices and vesicles in solution. [Pg.185]

In all considered above models, the equilibrium morphology is chosen from the set of possible candidates, which makes these approaches unsuitable for discovery of new unknown structures. However, the SCFT equation can be solved in the real space without any assumptions about the phase symmetry [130], The box under the periodic boundary conditions in considered. The initial quest for uy(r) is produced by a random number generator. Equations (42)-(44) are used to produce density distributions T(r) and pressure field ,(r). The diffusion equations are numerically integrated to obtain q and for 0 < s < 1. The right-hand size of Eq. (47) is evaluated to obtain new density profiles. The volume fractions at the next iterations are obtained by a linear mixing of new and old solutions. The iterations are performed repeatedly until the free-energy change... [Pg.174]

The theory of polymer adsorption is complicated for most situations, because in general the free energy of adsorption is determined by contributions from each layer i where the segment density is different from that in the bulk solution. However, at the critical point the situation is much simpler since the segment density profile is essentially flat. Only the layer immedia-... [Pg.55]

Several experimental parameters have been used to describe the conformation of a polymer adsorbed at the solid-solution interface these include the thickness of the adsorbed layer (photon correlation spectroscopy(J ) (p.c.s.), small angle neutron scattering (2) (s.a.n.s.), ellipsometry (3) and force-distance measurements between adsorbed layers (A), and the surface bound fraction (e.s.r. (5), n.m.r. ( 6), calorimetry (7) and i.r. (8)). However, it is very difficult to describe the adsorbed layer with a single parameter and ideally the segment density profile of the adsorbed chain is required. Recently s.a.n.s. (9) has been used to obtain segment density profiles for polyethylene oxide (PEO) and partially hydrolysed polyvinyl alcohol adsorbed on polystyrene latex. For PEO, two types of system were examined one where the chains were terminally-anchored and the other where the polymer was physically adsorbed from solution. The profiles for these two... [Pg.147]

Figure 12.8 Density profile at the interface between two immiscible solutions the labelling indicates the values of a. Figure 12.8 Density profile at the interface between two immiscible solutions the labelling indicates the values of a.
This energy functional attains its minimum for the true electronic density profile. This offers an attractive scheme of performing calculations, the density functional formalism. Instead of solving the Schrodinger equation for each electron, one can use the electronic density n(r) as the basic variable, and exploit the minimal properties of Eq. (17.8). Further, one can obtain approximate solutions for n(r) by choosing a suitable family of trial functions, and minimizing E[n(r)] within this family we will explore this variational method in the following. [Pg.234]

Within this local-density approximation one can obtain exact numerical solutions for the electronic density profile [5], but they require a major computational effort. Therefore the variational method is an attractive alternative. For this purpose one needs a local approximation for the kinetic energy. For a one-dimensional model the first two terms of a gradient expansion are ... [Pg.234]


See other pages where Density profile solutions is mentioned: [Pg.170]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.183]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.178 , Pg.179 ]




SEARCH



Density profiles

Solute density

Solutions density

© 2024 chempedia.info