Decision limit definition

The statistical concepts behind CCa and CC/3 are identical to the concepts of Lc and LDs, respectively. However, due to the different experimental design, the different interpretation and the legal framework, CCa and CC/3 should not be considered as alternative definitions of decision limit and LoDs. A graphical representation of CCa and CC/3 in the case of an established limit is given in Figure 6.6. 

But the question remains as to what const outes no residue." Currie (] ) examined the corresponding problem of detection limits in radiochemical procedures and was frustrated by the differences in terminology and definitions which resulted in a range of three orders of magnitude for detection limits calculated for the same system. Figure 4, taken from his paper, shows the situation with respect to a specific radioactivity process. The horizontal lines indicate three specific levels L, "decision limit," the level a signal must exceed to permit a decision as to whether or not the result of an analysis indicates detection Lj), "detection limit," the level above which an analytical procedure can be relied upon to lead to detection and Lq, "determination limit," the level above... 

Water Utilization Efficiency Water will quite definitely be a decisive limiting factor in the worldwide expansion of agriculture (9,54,57,58). It is therefore important that water utilization efficiency be considered in the future screening and development of herbaceous land plants as energy resources. Three factors must be assessed from the onset (a) Utilization efficiency in photosynthetic processes (b) water extracting capability from the candidate species natural terrain and (c), the specibs capacity for water conservation by anatomical means. 

ISO avoids the use of the word LOD and the term decision limit (xc) is enforced. Recent European guidelines stressed the application of that conceptual definition, although they used the symbol CC . The new concept of limit of detection (the term is superseded but we have kept it here to increase readability) measures the ability of the method not to give false positive results by focusing on samples that contain the target analyte with a concentration below or at the permitted level it is illustrated in Figure 5.26. Thus, the detection decision (former LOD) simply compares a prediction y with a critical level (Lc). 

Table 5.3 compares the CC and CC g limits. The first two rows correspond to the superseded LOD definitions where only a was fixed, at 0.05, and was not considered (fi = 50% risk of false negatives). The 3rd and 4th rows correspond to the Vc (CCx) and (CCp) definitions. It is clear that CC does not change with respect to the old definition because it does not consider the fi error. As expected, CCp (x ) is higher than the decision limit, CC or Also, the calculated limits improve when three replicates are analysed instead of only one (as is usual in ETA AS). Therefore, we can state that the PLS model recognizes a test solution as different from the blank when its Cu concentration is higher... 

Figure 3.159 Definition of the limit of detection (LOD) from the decision limit. The limit of detection (LOD) is defined as that quantity of substance, concentration or content which is given using the calibration function from the smallest detectable signal...

The problem is defined during process development as information becomes available and decisions are made. Initially, the definition is limited, vague, and brief and economic analysis involves a high level of uncertainty. As the project evolves, the definition becomes more complete, more highly specific, and lengthier. At the same time, the economic assessment tends to exhibit less uncertainty. 

Similar considerations were taken into account throughout the process of designing the study and committing the design to a protocol. In addition to analytical quality specifications, decisions were made regarding definitions of limits of detection and quantitation, levels of apparent residues at which confirmation was required, and how such confirmation would be achieved. All of these decisions were based on fulfilling the objectives of the study while operating within unavoidable time and resource constraints. 

Procedural controls, process controls, 98-99 Process controls, 96-100 active controls, 98 inherently safer approach, 97 mitigation techniques, 99 passive controls, 97-98 procedural controls, 98-99 safe operating limits, 99-100 Process definition, documentation, 102-104 Process design, documentation, 105 Process hazard analysis (PHA) risk assessment, 92-93 screening methods, 63 Process risk management decisions, documentation, 105-106... 

As would be expected, in order to be able to have at least 95% confidence that the true CV p does not exceed its target level, we must suffer the penalty of sometimes falsely accepting a "bad" method (i.e. one whose true CV p is unsatisfactory). Such decision errors, referred to as "type-1 errors", occur randomly but have a controlled long-term frequency of less than 5% of the cases. (The 5% probability of type-1 error is by definition the complement of the confidence level.) The upper confidence limit on CV p is below the target level when the method is judged acceptable... 

It is, on the other hand, necessary to adopt one or other of the really fundamental alternatives, namely, whether there is a definite saturation limit to adsorption, or whether the adsorption goes on increasing indefinitely with increasing concentration in the gaseous phase. The simplest form of the first alternative is the unimolecular layer theory, the simplest form of the second the atmospheric theory. It might be thought that an experimental decision between these two possibilities could be made quite easily. The matter is, however, not quite simple, since slow solution effects and other complications are often superposed on... 

The scope definition is similar to the definition of the control volume in the thermodynamic analysis or the battery limits in process design, and for the LCA in terms of space and time (e.g., we follow the use of product X in the process from the raw materials to the time it is disposed by the consumer. Throughout the lifetime of the product, we analyze the environmental burden). The reasons for the study are also clearly defined (e.g., is the study necessary to make a decision about a process ), as well as an answer must be given as to who is performing the study and for whom. Consider the following hypothetical example ... 

Table 8.1 describes the steps of the methodology in more detail. The procedure starts with the Problem definition production rate, chemistry, product specifications, safety, health and environmental constraints, physical properties, available technologies. Then, a first evaluation of feasibility is performed by an equilibrium design. This is based on a thermodynamic analysis that includes simultaneous chemical and physical equilibrium (CPE). The investigation can be done directly by computer simulation, or in a more systematic way by building a residue curve map (RCM), as explained in the Appendix A. This step will identify additional thermodynamic experiments necessary to consolidate the design decisions, mainly phase-equilibrium measurements. Limitations set by chemical equilibrium or by thermodynamic boundaries should be analyzed here. 

One of the most important performance characteristics in residue analysis is certainly the detection capability of a method. Unfortunately, many different definitions with regard to the detection and quantifying capability of an analytical method are found in the literature. Attempts have been made to harmonize the definitions with regard to the limit of detection (LoD) and the limit of quantification (LoQ). For the sake of consistency, here reference is made only to the harmonized definitions of IUPAC and ISO for the detection decision (Lc, critical value), LoD (minimum detectable value) and LoQ (minimum quantifiable value) (45 -47). ISO terminology is given between brackets. 

---