Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Data relationships

Under the proper conditions (said conditions being that the errors that prevent all the data relationships from being described by a single equation are normally [1, 2] distributed) it can be proven mathematically that the most probable equation is exactly the one that is the least square equation. While we have discussed this point... [Pg.33]

Foremost among the methods for interpolating within a known data relationship is regression the fitting of a line or curve to a set of known data points on a graph, and the interpolation ( estimation ) of this line or curve in areas where we have no data points. The simplest of these regression models is that of linear regression (valid... [Pg.931]

K. A. Sharp, A. Nicholls, R. Friedman, and B. Honig. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry, 30 9686-9697, 1991. [Pg.571]

Equation (6.3) adequately fits laboratory data. Relationships (6.4) and (6.5) make the description of phytoplankton production more accurate for critical environmental conditions when the concentration of nutrients and the temperature fluctuate widely. The coefficients of these relationships are defined on the basis of estimates given by Legendre and Legendre (1998). [Pg.370]

Extracting Hydrophobic Free Energies From Experimental Data Relationship to Protein Folding and Theoretical Models. [Pg.78]

If it took five experiments to develop a data relationship curve, in this problem if we varied one parameter at a time and have four independent variables, we would need a set of sets of charts representing 625 experiments. Instead, we run five experiments to develop the curve of the functionality relationship of the dimensionless groups in Eq. (26.2) (see Figure 26.6). [Pg.380]

The caCORE component forms the foundation for a number of scientific and clinical applications. One application is CMAP, a work in progress that can be regarded as a prototypical caCORE-powered application. The availability of the caCORE-enabled CMAP is to be prototyped in a relatively short time. Cancer data and data relationships are presented in CMAP with rich graphics, and the application leverages caBIO APIs to provide a straightforward interface to quite complex underlying queries. [Pg.394]

Isocratic retention, prediction from gradient runs, 204-205 errors in, 209-211 ion-exchange HPLC, 206-208 reversed-phase HPLC 205-206 Isocmtic retention data, relationship to... [Pg.161]

In the accuracy data accumulation system, measured data, design data and evaluation results are accumulated according to name, feature, or evaluation result of assembles. The metadata is attached in resource description framework (RDF) format [37] and has URI for identifying the accumulated data. Relationships of each assemble are stmctured in RDF format, and the user can edit the relationships. [Pg.689]

In Fig. 2 the comparison experimental 2, and ealculated aecording to the equation (2) TJ values of limiting draw ratio for studied carbon plastics at four testing temperatures are given. As can be seen, between and X enough close correspondence is received and observed scatter of data relationship 1 1 is symmetrical and due to well known statistical character of fracture process. [Pg.29]

The data relationships provide the structure for the schema design and we look at this in detail. As a general rule data relationship can be one to one, one to many, or many to many [1]. The complexity increases as we move away from one to one to many to many, and the latter is often the case in manufaeturing as illustrated by the hierarchy of information shown in Figure 3.2. [Pg.32]

Starting at the top, the assembly data object has one-to-many type of relationship with the part data object, whilst part object has one-to-one type of relationship with the assembly object. This determines the schema for the assembly objeet and bill of materials (BOM) is an example of it. The part object has one-to-one type of relationship with the task sequence object and it is the same viee versa. In practical terms this means that there is always a unique sequenee of tasks to manufacture the part dictated by the material and volume involved. The task sequence object has one-to-many type of relationship with the task object and the task object has a one-to-one type of relationship with the task sequence. This means that a task sequence often contains many different types of tasks. Finally, the task object has one-to-many type of relationship with the material object and equipment object, whilst the material and the equipment objects have a one-to-one type of relationship with the task object In practical terms this means that a task often utihses many different types of materials and equipment to make the parts. The determination of these relationships together with the object attributes lead us to the schema design that can hold all the information required for the manufacturing process design. The data relationships model of Fig. 3.2 integrates the key variables involved and their interactions... [Pg.32]

As discussed by McCarty et al. (1985), the relationship between internal and external steady-state equilibrium toxicant concentrations appears to be adequately described by a simple one constant equation. Although they were able to show that there appeared to be a constant internal toxicant concentration for certain narcotic organic chemicals and some substituted phenols, they were not able to quantify the relationships. Furthermore, acute and chronic QSARs did not appear to be parallel. When the original data relationships are described by the geometric mean regression technique, the relationships are more accurately described and quantification is possible. [Pg.214]

The Data and Information Viewpoint articulates the data relationships and alignment structures in the architecture content for the capability and operational requirements, system engineering processes, and systems and services. [Pg.201]

DIS databases contain collections of interrelated objects which represent any identifiable information fact For example, a part screwlO, a parts attribute Weight, a string of characters SC342P, a part s type (meta-data) SCREW, and a procedure Add-To-Inventory, are all modeled uniformly as objects. What distinguishes different kinds of objects is the set of structural (meta-data) and non-structural (data) relationships defined on them. [Pg.540]


See other pages where Data relationships is mentioned: [Pg.943]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.765]   


SEARCH



Characterization data relationships

Data collection on a conventional X-ray source with an area detector (including tabulated cases) and relationship to synchrotron radiation

Data phylogenetic relationship

Data relationships linear

Further relationships between solvation thermodynamics and thermodynamic data

Mass transfer relationship experimental data

Quantitative structure-activity relationships experimental data

Relationships data—information—knowledge

Retention data relationships, micellar

Structure-activity relationships data mining

© 2024 chempedia.info