Data collection change analysis

Criteria 1) Relevance to human health endpoints. 2) Sensitivity to change in loadings. 3) Overall historical data quality. 4) Data collection infrastructure. 5) Feasibility of data collection and analysis. 6) Ability to adjust for confounding factors. 7) Understanding of linkages with rest of ecosystem. 8) Broad geographic distribution. 9) Well-known life history (for fauna). 10) Nonintrusive sampling. 

An automatic control system consists of various pressure, temperature, and flow sensors, valves and components controlled by a programmable logic controller (PLC), and an operator interface device. The operator interface control device can be as simple as a stop-go for totally dedicated systems, or a personal computer. A personal computer connected to the PLC to provide operator interface, data collection and analysis capability is recommended especially if the system parameter and/or the parts being processed will be changing. More importantly, a computer control system assures consistent and repeatable operation. 

The principal tool for performance-based quality assessment is the control chart. In a control chart the results from the analysis of quality assessment samples are plotted in the order in which they are collected, providing a continuous record of the statistical state of the analytical system. Quality assessment data collected over time can be summarized by a mean value and a standard deviation. The fundamental assumption behind the use of a control chart is that quality assessment data will show only random variations around the mean value when the analytical system is in statistical control. When an analytical system moves out of statistical control, the quality assessment data is influenced by additional sources of error, increasing the standard deviation or changing the mean value. 

To provide useful data, the latter requires change over time. The limitation of this type of analysis is that, as yet, there is no systematic collection of organic market data, which makes it difficult to generalise across countries. The situation in Europe is being addressed by the activities of EISfOM. See for example, Recke el al. (2004). The current chapter therefore draws on a number of different studies and data collections in order to illustrate the arguments put forward. 

One important aspect of the quality systems approach is the ongoing collection and analysis of quality data to continuously evaluate quality system effectiveness. Historical data, process knowledge, and risk analysis methods can be applied to identify specific data requirements. Trending and other data analysis methods can allow identification of actual and potential sources of nonconformity so that appropriate corrective and preventive actions can be taken in accordance with established change control procedures. 

The bioanalytical laboratory should have a written set of standard operating procedures (SOPs) to ensure a complete system of quality control and assurance. The SOPs should cover all aspects of analysis from the time the sample is collected and reaches the laboratory until the results of the analysis are reported. All deviations from SOPs must be authorized by the study director and documented in the raw data. Significant changes in established SOPs must be properly authorized in writing by management. 

Data collected for each run included acid analysis using inductively coupled plasma (ICF) to determine cation concentration and titration to determine H concentration. Filtering characteristics were determined using solid and filtrate yield rates, as well as back pressures during the filtration cycle. The filter cake was characterized by moisture content and composition. Solid samples were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine changes in particle shape and size under various process conditions, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the solids composition. 

Data collected for each process phase may also be evaluated statistically to evaluate objectively whether a process change was better or worse than the preceding one. For example, through analysis of variance, it would be possible to determine whether each process phase had demonstrated continued process control or clear improvement. The revalidation approach would thus allow the QA (or production technical services) group to proactively manage its responsi-... 

The ESCA method (2) and its application to aerosol particles (3) have been extensively discussed in the literature and will not be described here. The instrument used in these experiments is a modified AEI ES-200 electron spectrometer which has been updated by the installation of a Surface Science Laboratories Model 239G position-sensitive photoelectron detector. The modifications also included replacement of all lens and analyzer power supplies, as well as changing to a modern microprocessor-based data system. Data collection with the modified spectrometer is approximately 10 times as rapid as with the original, thus substantially decreasing sample degradation during analysis. 

---