Daltons atomic theory, 104 table

The dawn of the nineteenth century saw a drastic shift from the dominance of French chemistry to first English-, and, later, German-influenced chemistry. Lavoisier s dualistic views of chemical composition and his explanation of combustion and acidity were landmarks but hardly made chemistry an exact science. Chemistry remained in the nineteenth century basically qualitative in its nature. Despite the Newtonian dream of quantifying the forces of attraction between chemical substances and compiling a table of chemical affinity, no quantitative generalization emerged. It was Dalton s chemical atomic theory and the laws of chemical combination explained by it that made chemistry an exact science. 

This system of nomenclature has withstood the impact of later experimental discoveries and theoretical developments that have since the time of Guyton de Morveau and Lavoisier greatiy altered the character of chemical thought, eg, atomic theory (Dalton, 1802), the hydrogen theory of acids (Davy, 1809), the duahstic theory (Berzehus, 1811), polybasic acids (Liebig, 1834), Periodic Table (Mendeleev and Meyer, 1869), electrolytic dissociation theory (Arrhenius, 1887), and electronic theory and modem knowledge of molecular stmcture. 

The oxides of nitrogen played an important role in exemplifying Dalton s law of multiple proportions which led up to the formulation of his atomic theory (1803-8), and they still pose some fascinating problems in bonding theory. Their formulae, molecular structure, and physical appearance are briefly summarized in Table 11.7 and each compound is discussed in turn in the following sections. 

Atomic hydrogen spectrum, 253 Atomic number. 88 and periodic table, 89 table, inside back cover Atomic orbitals, 262. 263 Atomic pile, 120 Atomic theory, 17, 22, 28, 234 as a model, 17 chemical evidence for, 234 of John Dalton, 236 review, 34... 

As you know, Dalton s atomic theory no longer applies in its original form, and Mendeleev s periodic table has undergone many changes. For example, scientists later discovered that atoms are not the most basic unit of matter because they are divisible. As well, the modern periodic table lists the elements in order of their atomic number, not their atomic mass. Of course, it also includes elements that had not been discovered in Mendeleev s time. Even so, in modified form, both of these inventions are still studied and used today in every chemistry course around the world. 

When Mendeleev invented the periodic table, he was well-acquainted with Dalton s atomic theory. He knew nothing, however, about subatomic particles, and especially the electron, which is the foundation for the modern periodic table s distinctive shape. Because the original periodic table developed out of experimental observations, chemists did not need an understanding of atomic structure to develop it. (As you will see in section 3.3, however, the periodic table easily accommodates details about atomic structure. In fact, you will learn that the modern periodic table s distinctive design is a natural consequence of atomic structure.)... 

The discovery of the rare earth elements provide a long history of almost two hundred years of trial and error in the claims of element discovery starting before the time of Dalton s theory of the atom and determination of atomic weight values, Mendeleev s periodic table, the advent of optical spectroscopy, Bohr s theory of the electronic structure of atoms and Moseley s x-ray detection method for atomic number determination. The fact that the similarity in the chemical properties of the rare earth elements make them especially difficult to chemically isolate led to a situation where many mixtures of elements were being mistaken for elemental species. As a result, atomic weight values were not nearly as useful because the lack of separation meant that additional elements would still be present within an oxide and lead to inaccurate atomic weight values. Very pure rare earth samples did not become a reality until the mid twentieth century. 

In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, chemists had so successfully isolated the elements that John Dalton was able to put together a genuine atomic theory. Dmitri Mendeleyev organised the elements into his periodic table, the culmination of scientific elegance. 

Although Dalton s theory was found to be unrealistically simple, he did compel chemists to adopt a standard scale of atomic weights. Because the combining weight of oxygen is approximately 16 times that of hydrogen, the preceding chart can be revised, as shown in Table 1-2. 

Dalton s work on relative weights, multiple proportions, and the atomic theory did not have an immediate effect on chemists of his day. Dalton s ideas did provide a framework for determining the empirical formula of compounds, but his table of relative weights was not accurate enough to give consistent results. Many scientists still debated the existence of atoms in the second half of the nineteenth century. Still, little by little, the atomic theory was adopted by chemists as a valid model for the basic structure of matter. While Dalton continued his life as a humble tutor in Manchester, other chemists used Dalton s ideas to establish the atomic theory. Foremost among these was Jons Jacob Berzelius (1779-1848) of Sweden, the foremost chemical authority of the first half of the nineteenth century. 

The mass number gives the total number of protons and neutrons in an atom of an element, but it does not convey the absolute mass of the atom. To work with the masses of elements, we use comparative masses. Initially, Dalton and the other pioneers of the atomic theory used the lightest element hydrogen and compared masses of other elements to hydrogen. The modern system uses C-12 as the standard and defines one atomic mass unit (amu) as 1/12 the mass of one C-12 atom. One amu is approximately 1.66 X 10 g. This standard means the masses of individual protons and neutrons are slightly more than 1 amu as shown in Table 4.6. 

Dalton proposed his atomic theory in 1803. He published a table of atomic masses. The errors (due to errors in his assumptions) in his first table were corrected in 1858. 

Our concept of an atom has changed quite a bit since Dalton first provided evidence for the existence of atoms. You should be familiar with the major contributions to the development of modern atomic theory. They do pop up on the test from time to time. Table 4.1 provides a good overview of these individuals and their contributions. 

As part of his atomic theory, John Dalton stated that atoms combine with one another in simple whole number ratios to form compounds. For example, the molecular formula of benzene, C6H6, indicates that one molecule of benzene contains 6 carbon atoms and 6 hydrogen atoms. The empirical formula (also known as the simplest formula) of a compound shows the lowest whole number ratio of the elements in the compound. The molecular formula (also known as the actual formula) describes the number of atoms of each element that make up a molecule or formula unit. Benzene, with a molecular formula of C6H6, has an empirical formula of CH. Table 6.1 shows the molecular formulas of several compounds, along with their empirical formulas. 

Section 3.1 takes up the experimental laws on which Dalton based his atomic theory, and Section 3.2 discusses that theory itself. Some modern extensions of the theory, including subatomic particles and isotopes, are presented in Section 3.3. The concept of the masses of atoms of the individual elements is presented in Section 3.4, and the development of the periodic table is traced in Section 3.5. A much more sophisticated theory of the atom will be presented in Chapter 4. 

Since Dalton proposed his atomic theory, many types of experiments have been performed and many discoveries made that have led to the inescapable conclusion that the atom is not indivisible. Experiments with electricity in the 1850s showed that chemical reactions can be caused by the passage of electricity (a process called electtolysis) and that electricity can be geneaaled by chemical reactions (as in batteries). (See Chapter 17.) The discovery of radioactivity, in which atoms of an element are changed into atoms of other elements, was another source of evidence (see Chapter 21). The fact that the placement of three pairs of elements in the periodic table are not in order of atomic mass (Sections... 

John Dalton (1766-1844), an Englishman, began teaching at a Quaker school when he was 12. His fascination with science included an intense interest in meteorology (he kept careful daily weather records for 46 years), which led to an interest in the gases of the air and their ultimate components, atoms. Dalton is best known for his atomic theory, in which he postulated that the fundamental differences among atoms are their masses. He was the first to prepare a table of relative atomic weights. 

From this table it is clear that the proportions of oxygen in combination with a fixed weight of nitrogen are as I 2 3 4 5. This law together with the law of definite proportions has profoundly influenced the development of the atomic theory of Dalton. 

The third major phase of discovery of the transition elements came about during the 18th and 19th centuries. This was stimulated by the increasing understanding of chemical transformations and the improved methods of separation developed by the alchemists. The appearance of Dalton s atomic theory in 1803, followed by the Periodic Table in 1868, gave further impetus to the search for new elements and many new transition elements were discovered during this period. 

Lehrbuch der Chemie (item 31 in Table IV). The book, by this very influential chemist of his day, went through five editions between 1808 and 1848, and was the standard chemical reference book during that period. Another book of great importance to the development of chemistry was Thomas Thomson s A System of Chemistry (28). In this book, he was the first to advocate, ardently, Dalton s atomic theory and thereby did much to make Dalton s ideas well known to other chemists (4). 

These systems could scarcely have prospered without the atomic theory of Dalton, and there is little doubt that Dalton s promulgation of the atomic theory led to a new epoch in both symbolization and nomenclature (3). Dalton himself had a series of symbols, shown in Table II, clearly based on the older types and quite arbitrary in their selection. 

Such was the man who set the Atomic Theory upon a firm and enduring basis. In his famous Lehtbueh dtr Chemie he wrote I soon convinced myself by new experiments that Dalton s numbers were wanting in that accuracy which was requisite for the practical application of his theory,. . . After work extending over ten years. .. I was able in i8t8 to publish a table which contained the atomic weights, as calculated from my experiments, of about 2,00a simple and compound substances. ... 

Thanks to advancements in science since Democritus s day, Dalton was able to perform experiments that allowed him to refine and support his hypotheses. He studied numerous chemical reactions, making careful observations and measurements along the way. He was able to determine the mass ratios of the elements involved in those reactions. The results of his research are known as Dalton s atomic theory, which he proposed in 1803. The main points of his theory are summarized in Table 4.2. Dalton published his ideas in a book, an extract of which is shown in Figure 4.2. 

---