Atomic theory, Dalton

Most chemists at that time would hardly have found Berthollets view of variable composition a welcome idea, but even the acceptable (and empirically derived) chemical rules, such as definite proportions, needed a rational justification. Daltons atomic theory in 1808, like that of Berthollet, came from outside the mainstream of the empirical chemical story that this account has been following, but it produced so functional a rationale for the explicit laws of chemical composition, that the whole dispute regarding definite or indefinite composition became moot. 

Daltons lecture is printed in Henry E. Roscoe and Arthur Harden, A New View of the Origin of Daltons Atomic Theory [London, 1896], facsimile reprint (New York Johnson Reprint Corporation, i960), 13-18, at 14. 

M.P. Crosland, The First Reception of Daltons Atomic Theory in France, in Card-well, Dalton the Progress of Science, 274-289. 

It is interesting to note that Daltons atomic theory had no means of confirming the existence of the atoms it assumed. How ironic that the theory of phlogiston was rejected largely because there was no observable evidence that phlogiston existed How was it, then, that Daltons theory became accepted when there was no direct evidence that atoms existed The answer must surely be simply that it worked so extremely well in providing a rational, and quantitative, organization of chemical constitution. 

Only after the atomic weight units of composition were established, was it possible for chemists to arrange those units successfully in meaningful molecular arrays and conceive the ideas of valence and directional bonding. Molecular structure remains today the central theoretical focus of attention, whether in the realm of molecular biology, biochemistry, chemical pharmaceutics, or polymer plastics. Daltons atomic theory must be seen as the climax of the history of chemical composition and terminates this story. ... 

Dalton wrote down his ideas about atoms in notebooks of 1802. The first public mention of Daltons atomic theory and laws of combining proportions was by Thomas Thomson in 1807, and only in the following year, 1808, did Dalton publish his own account. That publication coincided with the publication in France of a different law of combining proportions. 

Post-ingestion from a-, (3- y-carotene other carotenes from plant leaves a wide variety of fruit, root seed sources e.g. Daucus carota (carrot) (Apiaceae) [root] Retinal covalently linked to opsins (— light receptor Rhodopsins in vision) colour blind John Dalton (atomic theory, 1766-1844) bequeathed his eyes to science 2 centuries on molecular biology confirmed the absence of the gene for the green photoreceptor opsin... 

Conservation of mass Recall from Chapter 3 that the law of conservation of mass states that mass is conserved in any process, such as a chemical reaction. Daltons atomic theory easily explains that the conservation of mass in chemical reactions is the result of the separation, combination, or rearrangement of atoms—atoms that are not created, destroyed, or divided in the process. The formation of a compound from the combining of elements and the conservation of mass during the process are shown in Figure 4.3. The number of atoms of each type is the same before and after the reaction. Daltons convincing experimental evidence and clear explanation of the composition of compounds, and conservation of mass led to the general acceptance of his atomic theory. 

Daltons atomic theory was a huge step toward the current atomic model of matter. However, not all of Daltons theory was accurate. As is often the case in science, Daltons theory had to be revised as additional information was learned that could not be explained by the theory. As you will learn in this chapter, Dalton was wrong about atoms being indivisible. Atoms are divisible into several subatomic particles. Dalton was also wrong about all atoms of a given element having identical properties. Atoms of the same element can have slightly different masses. 

Thomson concluded that the mass of the charged particle was much less than that of a hydrogen atom, the lightest known atom. The conclusion was shocking because it meant there were particles smaller than the atom. In other words, Dalton had been incorrect—atoms were divisible into smaller subatomic particles. Because Daltons atomic theory had become so widely accepted and Thomsons conclusion was so revolutionary, many other scientists found it hard to accept this new discovery. But Thomson was correct. He had identified the first subatomic particle—the electron. He received a Nobel Prize in 1906 for this discovery. 

Describe the basic postulates of Daltons atomic theory. (Section 2.1)... 

Dalton atomic theory John Dalton, an English schoolmaster, was the first person to formulate a theory of matter. In 1808 he made the following assertions. Matter consists of atoms, which are tiny indivisible particles. Atoms cannot be created or destroyed. The atoms of one element are all identical, particularly in mass, and are different from atoms of other elements. Compound atoms (now called molecules) are formed when small numbers of atoms combine chemically. Compound atoms within a compound are identical and differ from those of other compounds. Modern atomic theory has superseded this theory. 

Briefly state, in your own words, Daltons atomic theory. How might the concept of embedded hooks have been used to explain the existence of molecules formed between the atoms that Dalton pictured ... 

---