Cyclohexene separation

Cyclohexane, produced from the partial hydrogenation of benzene [71-43-2] also can be used as the feedstock for A manufacture. Such a process involves selective hydrogenation of benzene to cyclohexene, separation of the cyclohexene from unreacted benzene and cyclohexane (produced from over-hydrogenation of the benzene), and hydration of the cyclohexane to A. Asahi has obtained numerous patents on such a process and is in the process of commercialization (85,86). Indicated reaction conditions for the partial hydrogenation are 100—200°C and 1—10 kPa (0.1—1.5 psi) with a Ru or zinc-promoted Ru catalyst (87—90). The hydration reaction uses zeotites as catalyst in a two-phase system. Cyclohexene diffuses into an aqueous phase containing the zeotites and there is hydrated to A. The A then is extracted back into the organic phase. Reaction temperature is 90—150°C and reactor residence time is 30 min (91—94). 

The mixture can be separated by distillation. The primary phosphine is recycled for use ia the subsequent autoclave batch, the secondary phosphine is further derivatized to the corresponding phosphinic acid which is widely employed ia the iadustry for the separation of cobalt from nickel by solvent extraction. With even more hindered olefins, such as cyclohexene [110-83-8] the formation of tertiary phosphines is almost nondetectable. 

Cyclohexene can be prepared on a large scale still more rapidly and efficiently by the distillation of cyclohexanol over silica geP or, better, activated alumina. Using a 25-mm. tube packed with 8- to 14-mesh activated alumina (Aluminum Company of America) and heated to 380-450 over a 30-cm. length, 1683 g. of cyclohexanol was dehydrated in about four hours. After separating the water, drying with sodium sulfate, and fractionating with a simple column, 1222 g. (89 per cent yield) of cyclohexene, b.p. 82-84 , was obtained. 

Draw a Lewis structure for cyclohexenone that involves charge separation for the most polar bond. Then, draw a Lewis structure that will delocalize one or both charges. Next, examine the actual geometry of cyclohexenone. Are the bond distances consistent with the Lewis structure shown above, or have they altered in accord with your alternative (charge separated) Lewis structure (Structures for cyclohexene and cyclohexanone are available for reference.)... 

In a dry, 250 ml, three-necked flask equipped with a dropping funnel and magnetic stirrer are placed 40 ml of dry /-butyl alcohol (distilled from calcium hydride) and 4.0 g (0.036 mole) of potassium /-butoxide. The solution is cooled in ice and 40 g (49 ml, 0.49 mole) of dry cyclohexene is added. Bromoform (10 g, 3.5 ml, 0.039 mole) is added to the cooled, stirred reaction vessel dropwise over about hour, and the vessel is stirred an additional hour with the ice bath removed. The reaction mixture is poured into water (approx. 150 ml), and the layers are separated. The aqueous layer is extracted with 25 mi of pentane, and the extract is combined with the organic layer. The combined layers are dried (sodium sulfate), and the solvent is removed. The product is purified by distillation, bp 10078 mm. 

The cyclohexene is easy to see so that the Diels-Alder disconnection follows. The stereochemistry of the double bonds comes from two separate arguments the dienophile (a in 5) must be trarjs as the two substituents it produces in (4) are also trans. The diene must be all ain or all trann since the two substituents it produces in (4) are ois (both down). The all tvan, is needed because endo approach (6) is preferred. 

The first synthesis, by method a, of amylostatin (XG) was reported by Kuzuhara and Sakairi. The synthon for the cyclohexene moiety was the benzylated allyl bromide 382, derived from D-glucose by the sequence 378 — 382 of the Perrier reaction. The coupling reaction of 382 using an excess of 4-amino-T,6 -anhydro-4,6-dideoxymaltose tetrabenzyl ether (383), and sodium iodide in DMF for 3 days produced a mixture of the epimeric monocarba-trisaccharide derivatives, separation of which gave the protected derivatives in 15% yield. 

In the present study, the HDN of decahydroq unohne (DHQ) was studied over NiMo(P)/Al20.T catalysts in the presence and absence of H2S. The reaction took place at 593 K and 3.0 MPa, thus allowing us to observe the most important reaction intermediate, propylcyclohexylamine, and to calculate the kinetic constants from the experimental results. Rate and adsorption constants for the different reaction steps were determined by separate and by combined HDN studies of DHQ and cyclohexene. 

The liquid-phase hydration of cyclohexene is carried out by a Japanese company with a slurry of zeolite ZSM-5 as the catalyst. Here, the product separates into two layers and cyclohexano leaves in the organic cyclohexene phase and the catalyst stays in the aqueous phase, which is recycled. The two-phase strategy, therefore, has special significance in this case. A recent publication by Ogawa et al. (1998a) gives some details of this system. 

Quinoxalinecarbonitrile (74) and cyclohexene gave 2-(cyclohex-2-enyl)qui-noxaline (75) [AcMe, hv (254 nm), N2, 18 h 14%] or a separable mixture of 2-(2,3-dimethylbut-2-enyl)- (76) and 2-(l,l,2-trimethylallyl)quinoxaline (77) (likewise 44% before separation) mechanism(s) remain obscure.525... 

Likewise it is possible to differentiate between substituted and unsubstituted alicycles using inclusion formation with 47 and 48 only the unbranched hydrocarbons are accommodated into the crystal lattices of 47 and 48 (e.g. separation of cyclohexane from methylcyclohexane, or of cyclopentane from methylcyclopentane). This holds also for cycloalkenes (cf. cyclohexene/methylcyclohexene), but not for benzene and its derivatives. Yet, in the latter case no arbitrary number of substituents (methyl groups) and nor any position of the attached substituents at the aromatic nucleus is tolerated on inclusion formation with 46, 47, and 48, dependent on the host molecule (Tables 7 and 8). This opens interesting separation procedures for analytical purposes, for instance the distinction between benzene and toluene or in the field of the isomeric xylenes. 

The titanosilicate version of UTD-1 has been shown to be an effective catalyst for the oxidation of alkanes, alkenes, and alcohols (77-79) by using peroxides as the oxidant. The large pores of Ti-UTD-1 readily accommodate large molecules such as 2,6-di-ferf-butylphenol (2,6-DTBP). The bulky 2,6-DTBP substrate can be converted to the corresponding quinone with activity and selectivity comparable to the mesoporous catalysts Ti-MCM-41 and Ti-HMS (80), where HMS = hexagonal mesoporous silica. Both Ti-UTD-1 and UTD-1 have also been prepared as oriented thin films via a laser ablation technique (81-85). Continuous UTD-1 membranes with the channels oriented normal to the substrate surface have been employed in a catalytic oxidation-separation process (82). At room temperature, a cyclohexene-ferf-butylhydroperoxide was passed through the membrane and epoxidation products were trapped on the down stream side. The UTD-1 membranes supported on metal frits have also been evaluated for the separation of linear paraffins and aromatics (83). In a model separation of n-hexane and toluene, enhanced permeation of the linear alkane was observed. Oriented UTD-1 films have also been evenly coated on small 3D objects such as glass and metal beads (84, 85). 

Solid PVA-Co2+ composite asymetric membranes have been prepared starting from PVA and two different salts Co(N03)2 and Co(CH3COO)2, respectively, in order to separate cyclohexene/cyclohexan mixtures. A facilitated transport mechanism has been evidenced, due to the capacity of Co2+ ions to coordinate the olefin molecules [82], The authors reported stronger complexation of Co2+ ions with cyclohexene in the case of PVA/ Co(CH3COO)2 mixtures then in the case of PVA/ Co(N03)2 mixtures. It was found that for a concentration ratio of ([Co2+]/[OH]) by 0.75 mol/mol, the permeation flux of PVA membrane containing Co2+ increases 2-3 times and the separation factor increses 50 times compared with pure PVA membrane. 

Phenylazide dissolved in cyclohexene was irradiated with ultraviolet radiation for 39 hours. The unreacted cyclohexene was removed by distillation. The residue was separated by column chromatography using alumina(activity IV) as the adsorbent and n-hexane/diethylether(l l) as the developer. 

By a method similar to that described in the last section phenylazide in cyclohexene was irradiated with ultraviolet radiation and unreacted cyclohexene was distilled off with evaporation. The residue was extracted with n-hexane. The extract was separated into several products by gas and liquid chromatography. The gas chromatogram and the liquid chromatogram are shown in Figures 7 and 8, which give five peaks from A to E, and four peaks from A to D, respectively in addition to the peak due to the solvent. Peaks A and A were determined to be aniline by their retention times. Peaks B and C are due to 3,3 -bicyclohexenyl. Peaks C and D are those of aziridine[9] and the product which was formed by the insertion of phenylnitrene to C-H bond of cyclohexene. ... 

---