Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cyclohexanes coupling

Uses. The chemical inertness, thermal stability, low toxicity, and nonflammability of PFCs coupled with their unusual physical properties suggest many useflil applications. However, the high cost of raw materials and manufacture has limited commercial production to a few, small-volume products. Carbon tetrafluoride and hexafluoroethane are used for plasma, ion-beam, or sputter etching of semiconductor devices (17) (see loN implantation). Hexafluoroethane and octafluoropropane have some applications as dielectric gases, and perfluorocyclobutane is used in minor amounts as a dielectric fluid. Perfluoro-1,3-dimethyl cyclohexane is used as an inert, immersion coolant for electronic equipment, and perfluoro-2-methyldecatin is used for... [Pg.283]

One-bond couplings ( /ch) in saturated systems do not seem to have been investigated extensively. The value for cyclohexane (an average of couplings to axial and equatorial protons) iSk 123 Hz, and is increased by substitution adjacent to the carbon by an electronegative element, as with the aromatic systems discussed above. [Pg.16]

Substituent effects (electronegativity, configuration) influence these coupling constants in four-, five- and seven-membered ring systems, sometimes reversing the cis-tmns relationship so that other NMR methods of structure elucidation, e.g. NOE difference spectra (see Section 2.3.5), are needed to provide conclusive results. However, the coupling constants of vicinal protons in cyclohexane and its heterocyclic analogues (pyranoses, piperidines) and also in alkenes (Table 2.10) are particularly informative. [Pg.44]

Neighbouring diaxial protons of cyclohexane can be clearly identified by their large coupling constants 11-13 Hz, Table 2.10) which contrast with those of protons in diequatorial or axial-equatorial configurations ( Jee 2-4 Hz). Similar relationships hold for pyranosides as oxy-... [Pg.44]

The CH fragment which is linked to the OH group (Sh = 5.45 ) can easily be located in the H and NMR spectra. The chemical shift values Sc =74.2 for C and Sh = 3.16 for //are read from the CH COSY plot. The H signal at S,i = 3.16 splits into a triplet (11.0 Hz) of doublets (4.0 Hz). The fact that an antiperiplanar coupling of 11 Hz appears twice indicates the diequatorial configuration (trans) of the two substituents on the cyclohexane ring 5. If the substituents were positioned equatorial-axial as in 4 or 5, then a synclinal coupling of ca 4 Hz would be observed two or three times. [Pg.211]

The effect of physical processes on reactor performance is more complex than for two-phase systems because both gas-liquid and liquid-solid interphase transport effects may be coupled with the intrinsic rate. The most common types of three-phase reactors are the slurry and trickle-bed reactors. These have found wide applications in the petroleum industry. A slurry reactor is a multi-phase flow reactor in which the reactant gas is bubbled through a solution containing solid catalyst particles. The reactor may operate continuously as a steady flow system with respect to both gas and liquid phases. Alternatively, a fixed charge of liquid is initially added to the stirred vessel, and the gas is continuously added such that the reactor is batch with respect to the liquid phase. This method is used in some hydrogenation reactions such as hydrogenation of oils in a slurry of nickel catalyst particles. Figure 4-15 shows a slurry-type reactor used for polymerization of ethylene in a sluiTy of solid catalyst particles in a solvent of cyclohexane. [Pg.240]

Figure 2.17 Schematic representation of the set-up used for on-line liquid-liquid exti action coupled with capillary GC when using a membrane phase separator. Reprinted from Journal of High Resdution Chromatography, 13, E. C. Goosens et al., Determination of hexachloro-cyclohexanes in gi ound water by coupled liquid-liquid extraction and capillaiy gas cliro-matography , pp. 438-441, 1990, with permission from Wiley-VCH. Figure 2.17 Schematic representation of the set-up used for on-line liquid-liquid exti action coupled with capillary GC when using a membrane phase separator. Reprinted from Journal of High Resdution Chromatography, 13, E. C. Goosens et al., Determination of hexachloro-cyclohexanes in gi ound water by coupled liquid-liquid extraction and capillaiy gas cliro-matography , pp. 438-441, 1990, with permission from Wiley-VCH.
The first bioanalytical application of LC-GC was presented by Grob et al. (119). These authors proposed this coupled system for the determination of diethylstilbe-strol in urine as a replacement for GC-MS. After hydrolysis, clean-up by solid-phase extraction and derivatization by pentafluorobenzyl bromide, the extract was separated with normal-phase LC by using cyclohexane/1 % tetrahydrofuran (THE) at a flow-rate of 260 p.l/min as the mobile phase. The result of LC-UV analysis of a urine sample and GC with electron-capture detection (ECD) of the LC fraction are shown in Ligures 11.8(a) and (b), respectively. The practical detection limits varied between about 0.1 and 0.3 ppb, depending on the urine being analysed. By use of... [Pg.273]

A co-solvent that is poorly miscible with ionic liquids but highly miscible with the products can be added in the separation step (after the reaction) to facilitate the product separation. The Pd-mediated FFeck coupling of aryl halides or benzoic anhydride with alkenes, for example, can be performed in [BMIM][PFg], the products being extracted with cyclohexane. In this case, water can also be used as an extraction solvent, to remove the salt by-products formed in the reaction [18]. From a practical point of view, the addition of a co-solvent can result in cross-contamination, and it has to be separated from the products in a supplementary step (distillation). More interestingly, unreacted organic reactants themselves (if they have nonpolar character) can be recycled to the separation step and can be used as the extractant co-solvent. [Pg.265]

The first series of soluble oligo(/ ara-phenylene)s OPVs 24 were generated by Kern and Wirth [48] and shortly after by Heitz and Ulrich [49]. They introduced alkyl substituents (methyls) in each repeat unit and synthesized oligomers 24 up to the hexamer. Various synthetic methods, like the copper-catalyzed Ullmann coupling, the copper-catalyzed condensation of lithium aryls, and the twofold addition of organomelallic species to cyclohexane-1,4-dione, have been thereby investigated. [Pg.38]

The quantitative solution of the problem, i.e. simultaneous determination of both the sequence of surface chemical steps and the ratios of the rate constants of adsorption-desorption processes to the rate constants of surface reactions from experimental kinetic data, is extraordinarily difficult. The attempt made by Smith and Prater 82) in a study of cyclohexane-cyclohexene-benzene interconversion, using elegant mathematic procedures based on the previous theoretical treatment 28), has met with only partial success. Nevertheless, their work is an example of how a sophisticated approach to the quantitative solution of a coupled heterogeneous catalytic system should be employed if the system is studied as a whole. [Pg.17]

Purely parallel reactions are e.g. competitive reactions which are frequently carried out purposefully, with the aim of estimating relative reactivities of reactants these will be discussed elsewhere (Section IV.E). Several kinetic studies have been made of noncompetitive parallel reactions. The examples may be parallel formation of benzene and methylcyclo-pentane by simultaneous dehydrogenation and isomerization of cyclohexane on rhenium-paladium or on platinum catalysts on suitable supports (88, 89), parallel formation of mesityl oxide, acetone, and phorone from diacetone alcohol on an acidic ion exchanger (41), disproportionation of amines on alumina, accompanied by olefin-forming elimination (20), dehydrogenation of butane coupled with hydrogenation of ethylene or propylene on a chromia-alumina catalyst (24), or parallel formation of ethyl-, methylethyl-, and vinylethylbenzene from diethylbenzene on faujasite (89a). [Pg.24]

Another example of a [2s+2sh-1c+1co] cycloaddition reaction was observed by Barluenga et al. in the sequential coupling reaction of a Fischer carbene complex, a ketone enolate and allylmagnesium bromide [120]. This reaction produces cyclopentanol derivatives in a [2S+2SH-1C] cycloaddition process when -substituted lithium enolates are used (see Sect. 3.1). However, the analogous reaction with /J-unsubstituted lithium enolates leads to the diastereoselective synthesis of 1,3,3,5-tetrasubstituted cyclohexane- 1,4-diols. The ring skeleton of these compounds combines the carbene ligand, the enolate framework, two carbons of the allyl unit and a carbonyl ligand. Overall, the process can be considered as a for-... [Pg.112]

A technique used to overcome the unfavorable thermodynamics of one reaction is to couple that reaction with another process that is thermodynamically favored. For instance, the dehydrogenation of cyclohexane to form benzene and hydrogen gas is not spontaneous. Show that, if another molecule such as ethene is present to act as a hydrogen acceptor (that is, the ethene reacts with the hydrogen produced to form ethane), then the process can be made spontaneous. [Pg.428]

Eulerian two-fluid model coupled with dispersed itequations was applied to predict gas-liquid two-phase flow in cyclohexane oxidation airlift loop reactor. Simulation results have presented typical hydrodynamic characteristics, distribution of liquid velocity and gas hold-up in the riser and downcomer were presented. The draft-tube geometry not only affects the magnitude of liquid superficial velocity and gas hold-up, but also the detailed liquid velocity and gas hold-up distribution in the reactor, the final construction of the reactor lies on the industrial technical requirement. The investigation indicates that CFD of airlift reactors can be used to model, design and scale up airlift loop reactors efficiently. [Pg.528]

From these data, some key information can be drawn in both cases, the couple methane/pentane as well as the couple ethane/butane have similar selectivities. This implies that each couple of products (ethane/butane and methane/pentane) is probably formed via a common intermediate, which is probably related to the hexyl surface intermediate D, which is formed as follows cyclohexane reacts first with the surface via C - H activation to produce a cyclohexyl intermediate A, which then undergoes a second C - H bond activation at the /-position to give the key 1,3-dimetallacyclopentane intermediate B. Concerted electron transfer (a 2+2 retrocychzation) leads to a non-cychc -alkenylidene metal surface complex, C, which under H2 can evolve towards a surface hexyl intermediate D. Then, the surface hexyl species D can lead to all the observed products via the following elementary steps (1) hydrogenolysis into hexane (2) /1-hydride elimination to form 1-hexene, followed by re-insertion to form various hexyl complexes (E and F) or (3) a second carbon-carbon bond cleavage, through a y-C - H bond activation to the metallacyclic intermediate G or H (Scheme 40). Under H2, intermediate G can lead either to pentane/methane or ethane/butane mixtures, while intermediate H would form ethane/butane or propane. [Pg.198]

Moreover, while the change from cyclohexane to hexane as the reactant has produced a large change in the relative selectivity of the methane/pentane co-products with respect to other products, the ratio of propane to the ethane/butane couple is very close (46/30 or 1.5 for hexane and 24/20 or 1.2 for cyclohexane. Table 8). This small variation compared with the very large change in (methane + pentane) selectivity (18% for n-hexane, 56% for cyclohexane) suggests that the formation of ethane/butane is independent of the formation of methane/pentane, that is that intermediate E is not a major contributor to the formation of the ethane/butane couple. [Pg.198]

Finally, the change in selectivity for the methane/pentane couple for the two different substrates (18% for hexane, 56% for cyclohexane) can be explained as follows in the case of cyclohexane, the Ci to C5 products are formed through the second carbon-carbon bond cleavage via the hexyl surface intermediate D whereas in the case of hexane, the initial carbon-hydrogen bond activation step can lead to any of three alkyl surface intermediates (D, E, and F) before arriving at the key metallacychc intermediates... [Pg.198]


See other pages where Cyclohexanes coupling is mentioned: [Pg.523]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.858]    [Pg.859]    [Pg.3033]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.926]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.279]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.71 ]




SEARCH



Coupling constants in cyclohexanes

Cyclohexane HH couplings

Cyclohexanes couplings, from COSY

© 2024 chempedia.info