Cutoff

This is of particular interest for determination of drugs. Most drugs bind to proteins to a certain extent (up to 99%) and only the unbound fraction is biologically active. In such cases, microdialysis gives an estimate of realistic free concentration. Factors such as flow rate of the perfusate, diameter and length of the membrane, molecular mass cutoff, and membrane composition have influence on microdialysis. 

Diameter and length of the microdialysis probe are determined by the site of sampling (see below). In general, the larger the area of the membrane, the higher the recovery of the analyte. 

Although membranes with a cutoff between 5 and 35 kDa are mostly used, the higher molecular mass cutoff membranes are also commercially available. The values given suggest that analytes with a molecular mass up to the cutoff value can be isolated. However, this is not the case, since these values reflect the cutoff mass at equflibrium. The cutoff value during microdialysis will be considerably lower and it is therefore recommended not to choose a cutoff too close to the molecular mass of the analyte. For a membrane with a cutoff of 5 kDa, the recovery of compounds larger than 1 kDa is lowered due to lower diffusion. 

---

Transducers twelve 375 kHz resonant transducers have been used, with a 350 kHz cutoff frequency high pass filter section and a 40 dB preamplifier. 

Plot the shape of the contact line pinned to a defect using Eq. X-30 for water on polyethylene, stearic acid, and platinum. Assume that the upper cutoff length is 2 mm. How does the shape of the pinned contact line compare with your observations of raindrops on dirty windows ... 

Figure Al.7.12. Secondary electron kinetic energy distribution, obtained by measuring the scadered electrons produced by bombardment of Al(lOO) with a 170 eV electron beam. The spectrum shows the elastic peak, loss features due to the excitation of plasmons, a signal due to the emission of Al LMM Auger electrons and the inelastic tail. The exact position of the cutoff at 0 eV depends on die surface work fimction.

After the signal emerges from the lock-m amplifier it still contains a considerable amount of noise. Most of the noise contributions to the signal can be eliminated by passing the signal tlirough a low-pass filter. The filter tune constant is a measure of the cutoff frequency of the filter. If accurate linewidth and g-factor... 

Figure B3.3.3. Periodic boundary conditions. As a particle moves out of the simulation box, an image particle moves in to replace it. In calculating particle interactions within the cutoff range, both real and image neighbours are included.

Figure B3.3.6. The Verlet list on its construction, later, and too late. The potential cutoff range, and the list range, are indicated. The list must be reconstructed before particles originally outside the list range have penetrated tire potential cutoff sphere.

Figure B3.3.7. The cell structure. The potential cutoff range is indicated. In searching for neighbours of an atom, it is only necessary to examine the atom s own cell, and its nearest-neighbour cells.

For diabatic calculations, the equivalent expression uses the diabatic potential matrix elements [218]. When the value of this coupling becomes greater than a pre-defined cutoff, the tiajectory has entered a non-adiabatic region. The propagation is continued from this time, ti, until the trajectoiy moves out of the region at time f2-... 

Schreiber, H., Steinhauser, O. Cutoff size does strongly influence molecular dynamics results on solvated polypeptides. Biochem. 31 (1992) 5856-5860. 

Saito, M Molecular dynamics simulations of proteins in solution artefacts caused by the cutoff approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 101 (1994) 4055-4061. 

Ding, H.Q., Karawasa, N., Goddard III, W.A. Optimal spline cutoffs for Coulomb and van der Waals interactions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 193 (1992) 197-201. 

Fig. 5. To generate an ensemble using Molecular Dynamics or Monte-Carlo simulation techniques the interaction between all pairs of atoms within a given cutoff radius must be considered. In contrast, to estimate changes in free energy using a stored trajectory only those interactions which are perturbed need be determined making the approach highly efficient.

Abstract. A smooth empirical potential is constructed for use in off-lattice protein folding studies. Our potential is a function of the amino acid labels and of the distances between the Ca atoms of a protein. The potential is a sum of smooth surface potential terms that model solvent interactions and of pair potentials that are functions of a distance, with a smooth cutoff at 12 Angstrom. Techniques include the use of a fully automatic and reliable estimator for smooth densities, of cluster analysis to group together amino acid pairs with similar distance distributions, and of quadratic progrmnming to find appropriate weights with which the various terms enter the total potential. For nine small test proteins, the new potential has local minima within 1.3-4.7A of the PDB geometry, with one exception that has an error of S.SA. 

It was also interesting to compare LN behavior as increases to trajectories that use nonbonded cutoffs for very large /c2, behavior of the LN trajectory begins to resemble the cutoff trajectory [88]. This observation suggests that the model itself, rather than the numerical scheme per se, is responsible for the deviations. 

Fig. 11. The Speedup of LN at increasing outer timesteps for BPTI (2712 variables), lysozyme (6090 variables), and a large water system (without nonbonded cutoffs 37179 variables). For lysozyme, the CPU distribution among the fast, medium, and slow forces is shown for LN 3, 24, and 48.

One of the most efficient algorithms known for evaluating the Ewald sum is the Particle-mesh Ewald (PME) method of Darden et al. [8, 9]. The use of Ewald s trick of splitting the Coulomb sum into real space and Fourier space parts yields two distinct computational problems. The relative amount of work performed in real space vs Fourier space can be adjusted within certain limits via a free parameter in the method, but one is still left with two distinct calculations. PME performs the real-space calculation in the conventional manner, evaluating the complementary error function within a cutoff... 

C- cutoff radius method - all non-bonded forces between particles within angstroms of each other are computed explicitly... 

Parallel molecular dynamics codes are distinguished by their methods of dividing the force evaluation workload among the processors (or nodes). The force evaluation is naturally divided into bonded terms, approximating the effects of covalent bonds and involving up to four nearby atoms, and pairwise nonbonded terms, which account for the electrostatic, dispersive, and electronic repulsion interactions between atoms that are not covalently bonded. The nonbonded forces involve interactions between all pairs of particles in the system and hence require time proportional to the square of the number of atoms. Even when neglected outside of a cutoff, nonbonded force evaluations represent the vast majority of work involved in a molecular dynamics simulation. 

Fig. 2. Patches divide the simulation space into a regular grid of cubes, each larger than the nonbonded cutoff. Interactions between atoms belonging to neighboring patches are calculated by one of the patches which receives a positions message (p) and returns a force message (f). Shades of gray indicate processors to which patches are assigned.

---