Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

CTAB, structure

This may not be the full answer as the photoinduced electron exchange between pyrene, P, and dimethylaniline, D, on CTAB micelles and other CTAB structures, etc.,... [Pg.335]

Write the structure of CTAB. Do not look it up in handbooks, only consider the full name of the compound. This compound acted as a detergent in your isolation procedure. Label which part of the CTAB structure is polar and which part is nonpolar. [Pg.474]

Figure 4.21 Schematic drawing of the formation of the complex with aromatic compounds starting from the pure CTAB structure... Figure 4.21 Schematic drawing of the formation of the complex with aromatic compounds starting from the pure CTAB structure...
Table 17.2 presents results of physical-chemical testing of the silica powders. The A1 sample has the lowest Cetultrimethyammonium bromid (CTAB) and Brunaues, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area, higher structure (DBF) and more silanol (-OH) groups on surface per unit area. [Pg.509]

The XRD and TEM showed that the bimetallic nanoparticles with Ag-core/Rh-shell structure spontaneously form by the physical mixture of Ag and Rh nanoparticles. Luo et al. [168] carried out structure characterization of carbon-supported Au/Pt catalysts with different bimetallic compositions by XRD and direct current plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy. The bimetallic nanoparticles were alloy. Au-core/Pd-shell structure of bimetallic nanoparticles, prepared by co-reduction of Au(III) and Pd(II) precursors in toluene, were well supported by XRD data [119]. Pt/Cu bimetallic nanoparticles can be prepared by the co-reduction of H2PtClg and CuCl2 with hydrazine in w/o microemulsions of water/CTAB/ isooctane/n-butanol [112]. XRD results showed that there is only one peak in the pattern of bimetallic nanoparticles, corresponding to the (111) plane of the PtCu3 bulk alloy. [Pg.62]

Surfactants employed for w/o-ME formation, listed in Table 1, are more lipophilic than those employed in aqueous systems, e.g., for micelles or oil-in-water emulsions, having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value of around 8-11 [4-40]. The most commonly employed surfactant for w/o-ME formation is Aerosol-OT, or AOT [sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate], containing an anionic sulfonate headgroup and two hydrocarbon tails. Common cationic surfactants, such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and trioctylmethyl ammonium bromide (TOMAC), have also fulfilled this purpose however, cosurfactants (e.g., fatty alcohols, such as 1-butanol or 1-octanol) must be added for a monophasic w/o-ME (Winsor IV) system to occur. Nonionic and mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant systems have received a great deal of attention recently because they are more biocompatible and they promote less inactivation of biomolecules compared to ionic surfactants. Surfactants with two or more hydrophobic tail groups of different lengths frequently form w/o-MEs more readily than one-tailed surfactants without the requirement of cosurfactant, perhaps because of their wedge-shaped molecular structure [17,41]. [Pg.472]

CTAB micelles accelerate its decay. However, this decay of hydroperoxide occurs preferentially due to the formation of the molecular product with an extremely low e value (see Chapter 3). This difference depends on the hydroperoxide structure. [Pg.440]

As expected, increases by a factor of 4 with decreasing phase volume in the CTAB pE over the composition range studied (Figure 1). In the Brij system quickly becomes approximately linear (within experimental accuracy) at the various compositions. An anomalously high value in the Brij pE occurs at (f) = 0.72. In this high-emulsifier region, however, the pE may have a different structure. [Pg.179]

Figure 2.9. Measured force F (normalized by the mean radius of curvature R of the surfaces) as a function of the surface separation between crossed mica cylinders coated with an adsorbed bUayer of CTAB and immersed in a micellar solution of CTAB (volume fraction of 0.073). In addition to the depletion attractive minimum, two oscillations due to structural forces turn up. (Reproduced from [21], with permission.)... Figure 2.9. Measured force F (normalized by the mean radius of curvature R of the surfaces) as a function of the surface separation between crossed mica cylinders coated with an adsorbed bUayer of CTAB and immersed in a micellar solution of CTAB (volume fraction of 0.073). In addition to the depletion attractive minimum, two oscillations due to structural forces turn up. (Reproduced from [21], with permission.)...
If proteins are in contact with some detergents as sodium do-decylsulfate (SDS) or cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) they become denaturated, e.g., their secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures are destroyed. They get a rod-like shape and the amount of bound detergent is proportionate to the molar mass of the proteins These protein-detergent complexes have negative charges at slightly alkaline pH if SDS is used and their size (hydrodynamic radius) is approximately proportional to their molar... [Pg.23]

Many reports are available where the cationic surfactant CTAB has been used to prepare gold nanoparticles [127-129]. Giustini et al. [130] have characterized the quaternary w/o micro emulsion of CTAB/n-pentanol/ n-hexane/water. Some salient features of CTAB/co-surfactant/alkane/water system are (1) formation of nearly spherical droplets in the L2 region (a liquid isotropic phase formed by disconnected aqueous domains dispersed in a continuous organic bulk) stabilized by a surfactant/co-surfactant interfacial film. (2) With an increase in water content, L2 is followed up to the water solubilization failure, without any transition to bicontinuous structure, and (3) at low Wo, the droplet radius is smaller than R° (spontaneous radius of curvature of the interfacial film) but when the droplet radius tends to become larger than R° (i.e., increasing Wo), the microemulsion phase separates into a Winsor II system. [Pg.207]

Figure 9.1 The phase diagram for the positively charged surfactant CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) depending on the relative concentration of CTAB, water, and hexanol, quite different organized structures are formed. Figure 9.1 The phase diagram for the positively charged surfactant CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) depending on the relative concentration of CTAB, water, and hexanol, quite different organized structures are formed.
A detailed study of the structure of the aggregates of the ionic surfactants in polyelectrolyte networks was presented in Refs. [66,68]. The dynamics of the changes in the microenvironment of the fluorescent probe, pyrene, in slightly crosslinked networks of poly(diallyldimethylammonium bromide) (PDADMAB) during diffusion of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in the gel phase has been investigated by means of fluorescence spectroscopy. In Ref. [66], an analogous investigation was reported for complexes formal by the sodium salt of PMAA with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). [Pg.164]

PDADMABr gels was significantly higher than in the micelles of SDS in water. At the same time, for the more hydrophobic CTAB, the polarity of the microenvironment of the probe in micelles in the PMAA network is low in comparison to that of the micelles in an aqueous medium. Thus, the results obtained confirm the theoretical prediction that the CMC in charged networks is much lower than in the solution (see Sect. 2.5). At the same time, these results show that there is a significant difference between the structure of micelles which are formed in polyelectrolyte gels and in water. [Pg.165]

Silica-CTAB-Water Phase Diagram at 150 °C Predicting Phase Structure by Artificial Neural Network... [Pg.871]

I is the number of input variables, J is the number of nodes in the hidden layer to be optimized. The model output S was set to 1 for the cubic MCM-48 structure, 2 for the MCM-41 hexagonal form and 3 for the lamellar form. The input variables Ui and U2 were the normalized weight fractions of CTAB and TMAOH, respectively. Hj+i and U1+1 are the bias constants set equal to 1, and coj and coy are the fitting parameters. The NNFit software... [Pg.872]


See other pages where CTAB, structure is mentioned: [Pg.152]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.698]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.878]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.121 , Pg.150 ]




SEARCH



CTAB

© 2024 chempedia.info