Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

CTAB

Fig. IV 23. Penetration of cholesterol monolayers by CTAB (hexadecyl-trimethylam-monium bromide. [From D. M. Alexander, G. T. Barnes, M. A. McGregor, and K. Walker, Phenomena in Mixed Surfactant Systems, in J. F. Scamehom, ed., ACS Symposium Series 311, p. 133, 1986 (Ref. 269). Copyright 1986, American Chemical Society.]... Fig. IV 23. Penetration of cholesterol monolayers by CTAB (hexadecyl-trimethylam-monium bromide. [From D. M. Alexander, G. T. Barnes, M. A. McGregor, and K. Walker, Phenomena in Mixed Surfactant Systems, in J. F. Scamehom, ed., ACS Symposium Series 311, p. 133, 1986 (Ref. 269). Copyright 1986, American Chemical Society.]...
Giustini M ef a/1996 Microstructure and dynamics of the water-in-oil CTAB/n-pentanol/n-hexane/water microemulsions a spectroscopic and conductivity study J. Phys. Chem. 100 3190... [Pg.2915]

Each Molfile consists of two parts the so-called header block specific to Molfiles (lines 1-3) and a eonnection table - Ctab (lines 4-18), which is fundamental to all MDL s CTfile formats. [Pg.48]

The first line of the connection table, called the counts line (see Figure 2-21), specifies how many atoms constitute the molecule represented by this file, how many bonds arc within the molecule, whether this molecule is chiral (1 in the chiral flag entry) or not, etc. The last-but-onc entry (number of additional properties) is no longer supported and is always set to 999. The last entry specifics the version of the Ctab format used in the current file. In the ease analyzed it is V2000". There is also a newer V3000 format, called the Extended Connection Table, which uses a different syntax for describing atoms and bonds [50. Because it is still not widely used, it is not covered here. [Pg.49]

For ammonium surfactants there is evidence for the existence of an additional specific interaction between the headgroups of the surfactant and the aromatic solubilisate . This is in line with the observation that partition coefficients for benzene in CTAB solutions are much higher than those for... [Pg.129]

In this section the influence of micelles of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) and dodecyl heptaoxyethylene ether (C12E7) on the Diels-Alder reaction of 5.1a-g with 5.2 in the absence of Lewis-add catalysts is described (see Scheme 5.1). Note that the dienophiles can be divided into nonionic (5.1a-e), anionic (5.If) and cationic (5.1g) species. A comparison of the effect of nonionic (C12E7), anionic (SDS) and cationic (CTAB) micelles on the rates of their reaction with 5.2 will assess of the importance of electrostatic interactions in micellar catalysis or inhibition. [Pg.133]

The effect of micelles of SDS, CTAB and C12E7 on the apparent second-order rate constants of the Diels-Alder reaction between nonionic 5.1a, anionic 5.1 f and cationic 5.1g with 5.2 is reported in Table 5.1. These apparent rate constants are calculated from the observed pseudo-first-order rate constants by dividing the latter by the overall concentration of 5.2. [Pg.133]

Table 5.1. Influence of micelles of CTAB, SDS and CiqEt on the annarent second-order rate... Table 5.1. Influence of micelles of CTAB, SDS and CiqEt on the annarent second-order rate...
In order to interpret the data in Table 5.1 in a quantitative fashion, we analysed the kinetics in terms of the pseudophase model (Figure 5.2). For the limiting cases of essentially complete binding of the dienophile to the micelle (5.If in SDS and 5.1g in CTAB solution) the following expression can be derived (see Appendix 5.2) ... [Pg.134]

Table 5.2. Analysis using the pseudophase model partition coefficients for 5.2 over CTAB or SDS micelles and water and second-order rate constants for the Diels-Alder reaction of 5.If and 5.1g with 5.2 in CTAB and SDS micelles at 25 C. Table 5.2. Analysis using the pseudophase model partition coefficients for 5.2 over CTAB or SDS micelles and water and second-order rate constants for the Diels-Alder reaction of 5.If and 5.1g with 5.2 in CTAB and SDS micelles at 25 C.
Table 5.2 shows that the partition coefficients of 5.2 over SDS or CTAB micelles and water are similar. Comparison of the rate constants in the micellar pseudophase calculated using the... [Pg.136]

Figure 5.4. Plot of the apparent second-order rate constant, kapp (= kotJ[5.2]i) versus the concentration of surfactant for the Diels-Alder reaction of S.lg with 5.2 in CTAB solution at 25 C. The inset shows the treatment of these data using Equation 5.6. From slope and intercut P j can be calculated (see Table 5.2). Figure 5.4. Plot of the apparent second-order rate constant, kapp (= kotJ[5.2]i) versus the concentration of surfactant for the Diels-Alder reaction of S.lg with 5.2 in CTAB solution at 25 C. The inset shows the treatment of these data using Equation 5.6. From slope and intercut P j can be calculated (see Table 5.2).
In this section the catalytic efficiency of Co(DS)2, Ni(DS)2, Cu(DS)2 andZn(DS)2 micelles as well as the effect of CTAB and C12E7 on the copper-ion catalysed Diels-Alder reaction between 5.1 and 5.2 is described... [Pg.139]

In all surfactant solutions 5.2 can be expected to prefer the nonpolar micellar environment over the aqueous phase. Consequently, those surfactant/dienophile combinations where the dienophile resides primarily in the aqueous phase show inhibition. This is the case for 5.If and S.lg in C12E7 solution and for S.lg in CTAB solution. On the other hand, when diene, dienophile and copper ion simultaneously bind to the micelle, as is the case for Cu(DS)2 solutions with all three dienophiles, efficient micellar catalysis is observed. An intermediate situation exists for 5.1c in CTAB or C12E7 solutions and particularly for 5.If in CTAB solution. Now the dienophile binds to the micelle and is slid elded from the copper ions that apparently prefer the aqueous phase. Tliis results in an overall retardation, despite the possible locally increased concentration of 5.2 in the micelle. [Pg.142]

Table 5.5. Influence of micelles of Cu(DS)2, CTAB and C12E7 on the apparent second-order rate constants (M s" ) for the copper(II) catalysed Diels-Alder reaction of 5.1c, 5.If and 5.1 g with 5.2 at 25 C . Table 5.5. Influence of micelles of Cu(DS)2, CTAB and C12E7 on the apparent second-order rate constants (M s" ) for the copper(II) catalysed Diels-Alder reaction of 5.1c, 5.If and 5.1 g with 5.2 at 25 C .
Calculations usirig this value afford a partition coefficient for 5.2 of 96 and a micellar second-order rate constant of 0.21 M" s" . This partition coefficient is higher than the corresponding values for SDS micelles and CTAB micelles given in Table 5.2. This trend is in agreement with literature data, that indicate that Cu(DS)2 micelles are able to solubilize 1.5 times as much benzene as SDS micelles . Most likely this enhanced solubilisation is a result of the higher counterion binding of Cu(DS)2... [Pg.144]

Studies on a large number of aromatic compounds have revealed that for CTAB the largest shift occurs for the alkyl chain protons near the surfactant headgroup, whereas in SDS nearly all proton signals are shifted significantly " ". For SDS, the most pronounced shifts are observed for protons around the centre of the chain. This result has been interpreted in terms of deeper penetration of... [Pg.145]

The aromatic shifts that are induced by 5.1c, 5.If and S.lg on the H-NMR spectrum of SDS, CTAB and Zn(DS)2 have been determined. Zn(DS)2 is used as a model system for Cu(DS)2, which is paramagnetic. The cjkcs and counterion binding for Cu(DS)2 and Zn(DS)2 are similar and it has been demonstrated in Chapter 2 that Zn(II) ions are also capable of coordinating to 5.1, albeit somewhat less efficiently than copper ions. Figure 5.7 shows the results of the shift measurements. For comparison purposes also the data for chalcone (5.4) have been added. This compound has almost no tendency to coordinate to transition-metal ions in aqueous solutions. From Figure 5.7 a number of conclusions can be drawn. (1) The shifts induced by 5.1c on the NMR signals of SDS and CTAB... [Pg.145]

Figure 5.8. Paramagnetic ion-induced spin-lattice relaxation rates (rp) of the protons of 5.1c and 5.1 f in CTAB solution and of CTAB in the presence of 5.1c or 5.1 f, normalised to rpfor the surfactant -CH-j. The solutions contained 50 mM of CTAB, 8 mM of 5.1c or 5.1f and 0 or 0.4 mM of [Cu (EDTA) f ... Figure 5.8. Paramagnetic ion-induced spin-lattice relaxation rates (rp) of the protons of 5.1c and 5.1 f in CTAB solution and of CTAB in the presence of 5.1c or 5.1 f, normalised to rpfor the surfactant -CH-j. The solutions contained 50 mM of CTAB, 8 mM of 5.1c or 5.1f and 0 or 0.4 mM of [Cu (EDTA) f ...

See other pages where CTAB is mentioned: [Pg.89]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.2576]    [Pg.2593]    [Pg.2599]    [Pg.2602]    [Pg.2602]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.151]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.402 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.329 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.63 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.282 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.197 , Pg.225 , Pg.228 , Pg.229 , Pg.230 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.542 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.53 , Pg.55 , Pg.58 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.249 , Pg.250 , Pg.492 , Pg.493 , Pg.554 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.604 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.131 , Pg.753 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.131 , Pg.753 ]




SEARCH



Ammonium bromide, CTAB

CTAB (cetyl trimethyl ammonium

CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium

CTAB = cetyl trimethylammonium

CTAB = cetyl trimethylammonium bromide

CTAB bilayer

CTAB films

CTAB precipitation

CTAB surface area

CTAB surfactant

CTAB toxicity

CTAB, hexadecyltrimethylammonium

CTAB, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide

CTAB, structure

CTAB-Templated Mesoporous Silica

CTAB-based microemulsion

Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide CTAB)

Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide CTAB)

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide CTAB)

Cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB

Microemulsions CTAB/hexanol/water

Polymerization, CTAB

© 2024 chempedia.info