Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Correlation packing

Under the conditions of the simulation, a small enrichment of solvent is even detectable at a planar polymer liquid— vapor interface. This is illustrated qualitatively by the snapshot in Fig. 37, which resembles the interface profiles in Fig. 10 (b). Of course, a more quantitative comparison has to consider capillary waves that broaden the interface profiles in the simulations [100] and the density correlations (packing) which are neglected in the SCF calculations. [Pg.93]

A detailed examination of the correlation between Vj and M is discussed in references on analytical chemistry such as Ref. 6. We shall only outline the problem, with particular emphasis on those aspects which overlap other topics in this book. To consider the origin of the calibration curve, we begin by picturing a narrow band of polymer solution being introduced at the top of a solvent-filled column. The volume of this solvent can be subdivided into two categories the stagnant solvent in the pores (subscript i for internal) and the interstitial liquid in the voids (subscript v) between the packing particles ... [Pg.646]

To use all of these equations, the heights of the transfer units or the mass transfer coefficients and must be known. Transfer data for packed columns are often measured and reported direcdy in terms of and and correlated in this form against and... [Pg.26]

Other correlations based partially on theoretical considerations but made to fit existing data also exist (71—75). A number of researchers have also attempted to separate from a by measuring the latter, sometimes in terms of the wetted area (76—78). Finally, a number of correlations for the mass transfer coefficient itself exist. These ate based on a mote fundamental theory of mass transfer in packed columns (79—82). Although certain predictions were verified by experimental evidence, these models often cannot serve as design basis because the equations contain the interfacial area as an independent variable. [Pg.37]

Fig. 23. Pressure drop and flooding correlation for various random packings (95). ip = p- o IP-l (standard acceleration of free fall) = 9.81 m/s, p, = liquid viscosity ia mPa-s numbers on lines represent pressure drop, mm H2O /m of packed height to convert to ia. H2O /ft multiply by 0.012. Packing... Fig. 23. Pressure drop and flooding correlation for various random packings (95). ip = p- o IP-l (standard acceleration of free fall) = 9.81 m/s, p, = liquid viscosity ia mPa-s numbers on lines represent pressure drop, mm H2O /m of packed height to convert to ia. H2O /ft multiply by 0.012. Packing...
Rate of Mass Transfer in Bubble Plates. The Murphree vapor efficiency, much like the height of a transfer unit in packed absorbers, characterizes the rate of mass transfer in the equipment. The value of the efficiency depends on a large number of parameters not normally known, and its prediction is therefore difficult and involved. Correlations have led to widely used empirical relationships, which can be used for rough estimates (109,110). The most fundamental approach for tray efficiency estimation, however, summarizing intensive research on this topic, may be found in reference 111. [Pg.42]

This type of equation has been found useful in correlating drop diameters in packed columns where the packing si2e exceeds the drop diameter (65). [Pg.69]

When two phases are present the situation is quite complex, especially in beds of fine soHds where interfacial forces can be significant. In coarse beds, eg, packed towers, the effects are often correlated empirically in terms of pressure drops for the single phases taken individually. [Pg.95]

The important point to note here is that the gas-phase mass-transfer coefficient fcc depends principally upon the transport properties of the fluid (Nsc) 3nd the hydrodynamics of the particular system involved (Nrc). It also is important to recognize that specific mass-transfer correlations can be derived only in conjunction with the investigator s particular assumptions concerning the numerical values of the effective interfacial area a of the packing. [Pg.604]

The predictions of correlations based on the film model often are nearly identical to predictions based on the penetration and surface-renewal models. Thus, in view of its relative simphcity, the film model normally is preferred for purposes of discussion or calculation. It should be noted that none of these theoretical models has proved adequate for maldug a priori predictions of mass-transfer rates in packed towers, and therefore empirical correlations such as those outlined later in Table 5-28. must be employed. [Pg.604]

To determine the mass-transfer rate, one needs the interfacial area in addition to the mass-transfer coefficient. For the simpler geometries, determining the interfacial area is straightforward. For packed beds of particles a, the interfacial area per volume can be estimated as shown in Table 5-27-A. For packed beds in distillation, absorption, and so on in Table 5-28, the interfacial area per volume is included with the mass-transfer coefficient in the correlations for HTU. For agitated liquid-liquid systems, the interfacial area can be estimated... [Pg.606]

D. Rectification in vertical wetted wall column with turbulent vapor flow, Johnstone and Pigford correlation =0.0.328(Wi) Wi P>vP 3000 < NL < 40,000, 0.5 < Ns. < 3 N=, v,.gi = gas velocity relative to R. liquid film = — in film -1 2 " [E] Use logarithmic mean driving force at two ends of column. Based on four systems with gas-side resistance only, = logarithmic mean partial pressure of nondiffusing species B in binary mixture. p = total pressure Modified form is used for structured packings (See Table 5-28-H). [Pg.607]

S] Correlates large amount of published data. Compares number of correlations, v,. = relative velocity, uVs. In packed bed, v,. = i>s pe,./e. [Pg.619]

TABLE 5-28 Mass Transfer Correlations for Packed Two-Phase Contactors—Absorption, Distillation, Cooling Towers, and Extractors (Packing Is Inert)... [Pg.621]

A. Absorption, counter-current, liquid-phase coefficient Hi, Sherwood and Holloway correlation for random packings... [Pg.621]

E. Distillation and absorption, counter-current, random packings, modification of Onda correlation, Bravo and Fair correlation... [Pg.622]

E] Use s BoUes Fair (Ref. 75) data base to determine new effective area to use with Onda et al. (Ref. 126) correlation. Same definitions as 5-28-D. P = total pressure, atm Mq = gas, molecular weight m = local slope of equilibrium curve Lf /Gf = slope operating line Z = height of packing in feet. [Pg.622]


See other pages where Correlation packing is mentioned: [Pg.287]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.2365]    [Pg.2543]    [Pg.2597]    [Pg.2673]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.606]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.174 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.174 ]




SEARCH



Bond orientational correlations packing

Dense random packing correlations

Eckert pressure-drop correlation, packed towers

Flood-packings correlation

Packed beds correlations

Packed column generalized pressure drop correlation

Packed columns Bravo-Fair correlations

Packed columns Onda correlations

Packed columns correlation

Packed towers generalized pressure drop correlation

Pair correlation function packing

Pressure drop, packings correlations

Pressure-drop correlations packed tower

© 2024 chempedia.info