Correlation coefficients, additive

We thus get the values of a and h with maximum likelihood as well as the variances of a and h Using the value of yj for this a and h, we can also calculate the goodness of fit, P In addition, the linear correlation coefficient / is related by... 

If the normalized method is used in addition, the value of Sjj is 3.8314 X 10 /<3 , where <3 is the variance of the measurement of y. The values of a and h are, of course, the same. The variances of a and h are <3 = 0.2532C , cf = 2.610 X 10" <3 . The correlation coefficient is 0.996390, which indicates that there is a positive correlation between x and y. The small value of the variance for h indicates that this parameter is determined very well by the data. The residuals show no particular pattern, and the predictions are plotted along with the data in Fig. 3-58. If the variance of the measurements of y is known through repeated measurements, then the variance of the parameters can be made absolute. 

In addition to analyzing the residuals, it may be desirable to determine the degree of agreement between sets of paired measurements and estimates. The linear correlation coefficient is... 

When these are close together, most of the simultaneously measured velocities will relate to fluid in the same eddy and the correlation coefficient will be high. When the points are further apart the correlation coefficient will fall because in an appreciable number of the pairs of measurements the two velocities will relate to different eddies. Thus, the distance apart of the measuring stations at which the correlation coefficient becomes very poor is a measure of scale of turbulence. Frequently, different scales of turbulence can be present simultaneously. Thus, when a fluid in a tube flows past an obstacle or suspended particle, eddies may form in the wake of the particles and their size will be of the same order as the size of the particle in addition, there will be larger eddies limited in size only by the diameter of the pipe. 

Lines in Figure 30.12 were drawn with parameters obtained when fitting data with Equation 30.3. It is fairly obvious that, outside the experimental window, data would not necessarily conform to such a simple model, which in addition cannot meet the inflection at 100% strain. All results were nevertheless fitted with the model essentially because correlation coefficient were excellent, thus meaning that the essential features of G versus strain dependence are conveniently captured through fit parameters. Furthermore any data can be recalculated with confidence within the experimental strain range with an implicit correction for experimental scatter. Results are given in Table 30.1 note that 1/A values are given instead of A. 

There are two statistical assumptions made regarding the valid application of mathematical models used to describe data. The first assumption is that row and column effects are additive. The first assumption is met by the nature of the smdy design, since the regression is a series of X, Y pairs distributed through time. The second assumption is that residuals are independent, random variables, and that they are normally distributed about the mean. Based on the literature, the second assumption is typically ignored when researchers apply equations to describe data. Rather, the correlation coefficient (r) is typically used to determine goodness of fit. However, this approach is not valid for determining whether the function or model properly described the data. 

In a similar approach to Hamaker, Timme et al. proposed six functions that are also empirically based. However, they took the additional step of suggesting that the choice of the equation should be based on the regression correlation coefficient (r). 

The correlation coefficients between a 10 year monthly mean time series of volatilisation rates and SST, 1 Om wind speed and pollutant concentration are used to elucidate which of the parameters drives the volatilisation rate changes and causes the deviations from the long term mean. All of the parameters do not vary independently. Since both SST and wind speed influence the volatilisation rate in a nonlinear manner, it is not intuitive whether an increase in wind speed leads to an increase in volatilisation rate. A raise in wind speed that coincides with a decrease of the sea surface temperature can lead to a negative linear correlation coefficient between volatilisation rate and wind speed. For that reason the partial correlation coefficient is calculated in addition to the simple linear correlation coefficients. It explains the relation between a dependent and one or more independent parameters with reduced danger of spurious correlations due to the elimination of the influence of a third or fourth parameter, by holding it fixed. One important feature of the partial correlation coefficient is, that it is equal to the linear correlation coefficient if both variables... 

In comp.ii mg die two anal.uk al methods, the additional evidence of a correlation coefficient of (1.007 and the puncd test result 1 I mcedure 1.4) confirm the observ mion that a slope of 1.006 and an intercept of 0.13 do -tot significantly dilfer from the theoretical values of 1.0 and 0 respectively. 

In addition to the temporal correlation coefficient, the spatial correlation coefficient was calculated approximately for fixed values of time. Except for one of the mathematical models, all techniques showed a better temporal correlation than spatial correlation. The two correlation coefficients are cross plotted in Figure 5-6. Nappo stressed that correlation coefficients express fidelity in predicting tends, rather than accuracy in absolute concentration predictions. Another measure is used for assessing accuracy in predicting concentrations the ratio of predicted to observed concentration. Nappo averaged this ratio over space and over time and extracted the standard deviation of the data sample for each. The standard deviation expresses consistency of accuracy for each model. For example, a model might have a predicted observed ratio near unity,... 

The correlation coefficient (in wavelength space) is especially suitable for constructing a general library as it has the advantage that it is independent of library size, uses only a few spectra to define each product and is not sensitive to slight instrnmental oscillations. This parameter allows the library to be developed and validated more rapidly than others. Correlation libraries can also be expanded with new prodncts or additional spectra for an existing prodnct in order to incorporate new sources of variability in an expeditious manner. 

Another series of trials, all identical to each other (no changes). This time, the results should be tabulated, and a mean and a standard deviation for the blank and each standard should be calculated and the data graphed (mean response values vs. concentration) to create the standard curve (Figure 3.2). In addition, the slope of the line and the y-intercept are determined, as well as the correlation coefficient. If the results look good, one moves on to Step 5, or makes some change to try to improve the results and repeat the above process. 

The specific effect of the different end groups is expressed by variations of k (branching, heteroatom) and b (additional n-electrons) X As can be read from Table 9, the correlation coefficient r is close to 1.0 in most cases. In some cases for n = 0 there are deviations which obviously arise from steric hindrance . Thus these data are omitted from the correlation. With cyanines one finds k 65 which some of the violenes exhibit too. Figure 9 again demonstrates the discussed correlation. 

---