Correction to the gaseous state

Given that some sort of solution thermochemistry is necessary, one must either make the corrections outlined by Williams (1942) and Fuchs and Peacock (1979) or make use of uncorrected or partially corrected data with an awareness of the enthalpic corrections that have been ignored. 

Fuchs and Peacock (1979) give the thermodynamic cycle alkene(g)--------------—— alkane(g) 

The influence of experimental strategy on the solvent correction is seen by contrasting the experiments of Williams with those of Turner s group. Williams gives the equation 

As a trial case, Williams chose hydrogenation of 1-heptene. He equilibrated Pt or Pd catalyst in glacial acetic acid under dry H2 at a pressure just over ambient. Upon breaking an ampoule containing 1 to 1.5 g (accurately weighed) of 1-heptene, Ahyd//was measured for the reaction 

The enthalpy of solution of n-heptane in glacial acetic acid was found in a separate experiment to be 1.436 0.006 kcal mol 1. Williams took enthalpies of vaporization from the literature, obtained by standard classical thermodynamic means, and corrected them to a temperature of 302.1 K to coincide with his Ahyd//measurements. This led to a difference 

---

Again following our earlier chapters as precedent, we will continue to view intermolec-ular forces as complications and nuisances to be avoided whenever possible. As such, unless explicitly noted to the contrary, any species to be discussed in this chapter will be assumed in the (ideal) gas phase. To interrelate these data with those for the liquid or solid state that characterizes most organic compounds as synthesized, reacted, purified and thermochemically investigated, it will be necessary to make corrections to the gaseous state by using enthalpies of vaporization and of sublimation. These are defined by equations 1 and 2... 

Conversely, if in a type of molecule which forms a gaseous film the chains are lengthened, other conditions remaining the same, first the cohesional corrections to the gaseous state of the films are increased next the mutual attraction between the chains causes them to pack more, closely and satisfy their mutual affinities all round the chains, by standing either upright, or tilted to the surface, cohering into masses of coherent film finally the motions of the molecules disappear and the film solidifies in the condensed state. 

The calculations actually refer to the gaseous state. We may, however, disregard the small correction to the liquid state inasmuch as heats of vaporization of the polymer unit and of the monomer will be approximately the same. 

The correct answer is (C). At the low pressure listed in the problem, the change in temperature moves the substance from the solid state to the gaseous state, otherwise known as sublimation. 

The estimation of the free enthalpy of formation using the data from Tables 2.2.8 to 2.2.10 leads to values for the gaseous state of the molecule (in some instances hypothetical state). However, few compounds and no polymers are in gas phase. For this reason, correction must be made to the gaseous state of a compound in order to estimate the free enthalpy for a specific reaction involving compounds in liquid or solid (crystalline or amorphous) state. A number of empirical rules are available for the change from gas phase to a condensed phase, and a selection of such corrections is given in Table 2.2.11 [35]. 

In this method, corrections are not made for the transfer enthalpy from solution to the gaseous state on the ground that solute molecules in very dilute solution with a noninteracting solvent are essentially independent of one another and mimic the ideal gas state. This assumption has been questioned but the results are confirmed by meticulous combustion experiments where they exist (Steele et al., 2002) and by high level computational values (Rogers, et al., 2004). 

The specific heat of gases at constant pressure is calculated using the principle of corresponding states. The for a mixture in the gaseous state is equal to the sum of the C g of the ideal gas and a pressure correction term ... 

The bomb process is then considered to occur isothermally at 298.15 K, with a corresponding energy change A(/ibp(298.15 K). In the final state the bomb contents are a gaseous mixture of 02, N2, C02, and H20, and an aqueous solution of 02, N2, C02, and HNO3 (figure 7.6). The Washburn corrections for the final state include the following steps. 

The symbol (g) denotes that the reactants and products are in the gaseous state except for the water, which is liquid (/). If we wish to have AH° with gaseous water H20 (g) as the product we have to make a correction for the heat of vaporization of water (10.5 kcal mole-1 at 25°) ... 

As the standard state of bromine we are free to choose the liquid or the gaseous state, of which the former will be selected. Correcting for the liquid junction at a- by the Henderson equation, (23), Chapter 13, and for incomplete saturation with bromine of the solutions used in the cell, Jones and Baekstrom obtain —0.9940 volt at 25° for the Eo value of the combination... 

In 1960 Bothner-By observed that for several simple organic compounds, a change from the gaseous to the liquid state was accompanied by a shift to low field of the protons in excess of that calculated using the classical bulk susceptibility correction. It was found possible to calculate the observed shift jS/ of a solute proton i in a solvent j by use of the empirical relationship—... 

Usually all of the enthalpies in reaction 2.2 refer to the reactants and products in the ideal gaseous state, and appropriate corrections must be made for a change of state if some of the components are in the liquid or solid state. To appreciate this fact fully, let us consider the combustion of a typical organic compound. Depending on the atoms in the molecule, the final products of combustion would be H2O, CO2, SO2, N2, and HX (where X is a halogen). The heat evolved in such a reaction is called the heat of combustion. Standard heats of combustion are often listed with H2O in the liquid state (i.e., as water) thus a suitable correction must be made to get the values with all of the products in the gaseous state. This is illustrated in Example 2.1. 

Their base strengths towards the proton could be regarded as a very good characteristic of the donor strengths of solvents. Unfortunately, the determination of an unambiguous scale of the exact basicities of the various solvent molecules towards the proton is difficult. Benoit and Domain [Be 74] consider the heat of solvation of the proton in the gaseous state to be the most suitable parameter for the characterization of the basicities of solvent molecules. In principle this is undoubtedly correct, but its practical determination is possible only by indirect means. 

---