Cooperativity, in binding

FIGURE 3.3 Displacement of prebound radioligand [A ] by non-radioactive concentrations of [A]. Curve for a= 1 denotes no cooperativity in binding (i.e., formation of the receptor dimer does not lead to a change in the affinity of the receptor for either [A] or [A ]). The curve a= 10 indicates a system whereby formation of the receptor dimer leads to a tenfold increase in the affinity for both [A ] and [A], In this case, it can be seen that addition on the nonradioactive ligand [A] actually leads to an increase in the amount of radioligand [A ] bound before a decrease at higher concentrations of [A], For this simulation [A ]/Kd = 0.1. 

The formation of ER dimers can be favored once the first monomer has bound to the DNA, since this presents positive cooperation in binding the next monomer. In any case, DNA binding creates a greater compaction of the dimer that results in a subsequent spatial restructuring of the receptor molecules. 

In summary, although each of the aforementioned books does touch upon some aspects of cooperativity in binding systems, none of them explores the details of the mechanisms of cooperativity on a molecular level. In this respect I feel that the present book fills a gap in the literature. I hope it will help the reader to gain insight into the mechanism of cooperativity, one of the cleverest and most intricate tricks that nature has evolved to regulate biochemical processes. 

The book is organized in nine chapters and eleven appendices. Chapters 1 and 2 introduce the fundamental concepts and definitions. Chapters 3 to 7 treat binding systems of increasing complexity. The central chapter is Chapter 4, where all possible sources of cooperativity in binding systems are discussed. Chapter 8 deals with regulatory enzymes. Although the phenomenon of cooperativity here is manifested in the kinetics of enzymatic reactions, one can translate the description of the phenomenon into equilibrium terms. Chapter 9 deals with some aspects of solvation effects on cooperativity. Here, we only outline the methods one should use to study solvation effects for any specific system. 

Deoxyhemoglobin has a low affinity for 02, but the observed cooperativity in binding implies that in the fully oxygenated state the 02 is held with a high... 

The allosteric properties of FDPases present an interesting subject for future study. In the case of the liver enzyme the substrate shows positive cooperativity in binding, but no evidence for cooperativity in catalytic activity has been obtained. Perhaps this is because of the high affinity of the enzyme for the substrate, which prevents precise kinetic measurement at low substrate concentration. On the other hand, the substrate has been shown to increase the affinity of the enzyme for AMP, the allosteric inhibitor. 

Since space is limited within the internal cavities of a-, (3-, and y-CDs, it was desirable to connect two and more CD rings to achieve some cooperativity in binding large guests. Two a-CD rings had been connected by one or two bridges at the primary rims [76], Two (3-CD had been connected, as well, via one or two bonds to a dimer by Breslow et al. [49,77-81], Recently, a heterodimer of a-CD and (3-CD was also synthesized [82],... 

Pawson and Scott, 1997). These modules are 60 amino acids in length and form a five-stranded 3-sandwhich structure Musacchio et al., 1992 Yu et al., 1992 see also the chapter hy Musacchio, this volume) their function is to hind proline-rich sequences in cellular proteins and hence facilitate the assembly of signaling complexes (Koch et al., 1991). A key question for the many proteins which contain hoth SH2 and SH3 domains is whether these domains cooperate in binding. Information regarding this question has been obtained from the structures of SH2-SH3 domain constructs, with the relevant data being the extent of molecular contacts and orientation between the SH2 and the SH3 domains. 

Prove that for > 1 the Hill equation describes positive cooperativity in binding, or kinetics, for an enzyme. SOLUTION... 

Bystroff, C., Kraut, J. 1991. Crystal structure of unhganded Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Ligand-induced conformational changes and cooperativity in binding. 

The bis-crown ether 3 (Fig. 2) showed a negative cooperativity in binding two or Na" cations, which resulted, however, from mutual repulsion of metal ions rather than from a negative allosteric effect.Binding of two neutral Lewis acids, e.g., Hg(CN)2 showed a positive cooperativity with the Hill coefficient /z= 1.5. This was interpreted as a result of positive allosteric effect due to the reduction of the conformational freedom of the second macrocycle favorable for complexation conformation upon binding of the first Hg(CN)2 molecule. 

Face-to-face dimeric metalloporphyrins represent a new class of homotropic allosteric receptors that show strong positive cooperativity in binding different... 

---