Control rod adjustment

Withdrawing a control rod reduces the neutron absorption and increases core reactivity. Reactor power then increases until the increased steam formation just balances the change in reactivity caused by the rod withdrawal. The increase in boiling rate ends to raise reactor pressure, causing the initial pressure regulator fo open the turbine admission valves sufficiently to maintain a constant pressure. When a control rod is inserted, the converse effect occurs. 

The rate of power increase is limited to the rate at which control rods can be withdrawn. Control rods can be operated one at a time, or in groups of four rods in a symmetrical pattern. Single rods or rod groups can be withdrawn continuously or in incremental steps (notch steps). Continuous movement is usually limited to subcritical and heatup conditions. Control rod movement is the normal method of making large changes in reactor power, such as daily or weekly load shifts requiring reduction and increases of more than 25% of rated power. 

---

Evaluation of the power flow map lines were evaluated to avoid any of the earlier problems that operators were facing, such as stability, and other maneuvers in the control rod adjustment maneuvers... 

Answer Adding or subtracting an increment of poison by control rod adjustment results in absorbing more or less neutrons and a decrease cr increase In the local power or fl ux In one of the small pile" regions. Xenon transients resulting from an Increased rate of b ornout when flux is increased, or Increased rate of buildup when flux is decreased, v lll Induce f urther local fl ox changes unless the transient effect is controlled locally. 

Do these reactivity transients take place every time a small control rod adjustment is made ... 

DLOFC is associated with a large primary helium leak, whereas LOFC means a failed circulator. In both cases, it is assumed that control rod insertion fails as well. For the DLOFC, it is considered that the initial helium pressure of 4 MPa is lost within an interval of 30 seconds, whereas for the LOFC the helium flow is ramped down to zero within 60 seconds and the system pressure is kept unchanged. The transient analyses have been done for a fresh core with equilibrium xenon concentration (BOL) and with the control rods adjusted for criticality (s45% insertion). Moreover, the core is supposed to be in operation long enough that the decay heat contribution at the start of the incident can be considered in equilibrium. Calculations have also been done for other time moments during the core lifetime, but the situation described here is the worst case. 

The fourth component is the set of control rods, which serve to adjust the power level and, when needed, to shut down the reactor. These are also viewed as safety rods. Control rods are composed of strong neutron absorbers such as boron, cadmium, silver, indium, or hafnium, or an alloy of two or more metals. 

Adjustable speed motor driven feedwater pumps and high-capacity control rod drive pumps with backup power improve the safety margin by improving correct operator response to non-routine events. 

The ROD is similar to a cold feed stabilizing tower for the rich oil. Heat is added at the bottom to drive off almost all the methane (and most likely ethane) from the bottoms product by exchanging heat with the hot lean oil coming from the still. A reflux is provided by a small stream of cold lean oil injected at the top of the ROD. Gas off the tower overhead is used as plant fuel and/or is compressed. The amount of intermediate components flashed with this gas can be controlled by adjusting the cold loan oil retlux rate. 

The reactor operator adjusts control rods so that an upper limit, such as 1 DPM, is not exceeded. This allows an orderly increase in reactor power. 

An alternative method to position two electrodes at nanometer distances apart is the mechanically-controlled, break junction (MCBJ) technique. An ultra-thin, notched Au wire on a flexible substrate can be broken reliably by pushing on the Au with a piezoelectric piston, cracking the Au (Fig. 4). This produces a gap between the Au shards whose size can be finely varied to 1 A by a piston or control rod [46, 47]. When UE molecules with thiol groups on both ends are present in a surrounding solution, the gap can be adjusted until the molecules can span it. A dilute solution means the number of spanning molecules will be small, and the least-common-multiple of current flow among many junctions indicates those spanned by a single molecule [47]. 

The reactor core, the source of nuclear heat, consists of fuel assemblies and control rods contained within the reactor vessel and cooled by the recirculating water system. A 1,220-MWe BWR/6 core consists of 732 fuel assemblies and 177 control rods, forming a core array 16 feet (4.8 meters) in diameter and 14 feet (4.2 meters) high. The power level is maintained or adjusted by positioning control rods up and down within the core. The BW R core power level is further adjustable by changing the recirculation flow rate without changing control rod position, a feature that contributes to excellent load-following capability. 

In a nuclear reactor, represented in Figure 12, the fuel rods are surrounded by a moderator. The moderator is a substance that slows down neutrons. Control rods are used to adjust the rate of the chain reactions. These rods absorb some of the free neutrons produced by fission. Moving these rods into and out of the reactor can control the number of neutrons that are available to continue the chain reaction. Chain reactions that occur in reactors can be very dangerous if they are not controlled. An example of the danger that nuclear reactors can create is the accident that happened at the Chernobyl reactor in the Ukraine in 1986. This accident occurred when technicians briefly removed most of the reactor s control rods during a safety test. However, most nuclear reactors have mechanisms that can prevent most accidents. 

Another generic problem has been the development of cracks in the control rod guide tubes of inconel which penetrate a PWR pressure vessel head. Such cracks are difficult to locate and repair because of the confined space between the tubes. After some time leaks usually develop when the cracks grow larger, ultimately requiring replacement of the vessel head. Crack formation can probably be prevented by a proper selection of material, its pretreatment and meticulous adjustment of the water chemistry. 

In addition to their excellent dielectric properties, RPs provide necessary strength with reduced silhouette and weight. The corrosion resistant, smooth, hard surfaces also resist the embedment of contaminants. Since at least the 1940s utility companies have used components that include pole-top pins, adjustable tension braces, guy-strain insulators, line spacers, insulator pins, upsweeps, double-insulator standoff brackets, switch control rods, hot sticks, and switchgear components. 

Structural evaluation of core support and PSR blocks under horizontal dynamic SSE loads and impact conditions will be based on reactor vessel and CLR response. Adjustments to vessel and CLR response characteristics can be made, if required, to limit reactor graphite array loads and deflections to acceptable levels to assure safe control rod insertion and structural integrity of the internals components. 

When Wilson s team was ready, writes Wattenberg, Fermi instructed Weil to move the cadmium rod to a position which was about half-way out. [The adjustment brought the pile to] well below critical condition. The intensity rose, the scalers increased their rates of clicking for a short while, and then the rate became steady, as it was supposed to. Fermi busied himself at his slide rule, calculating the rate of increase, and noted the numbers on the back. He called to Weil to move the rod out another six inches. Again the neutron intensity increased and leveled off. The pile was still subcritical. Fermi had again been busy with his little slide rule and seemed very pleased with the results of his calculations. Every time the intensity leveled off, it was at the values he had anticipated for the position of the control rod. ... 

The closer k approached 1.0, the slower the rate of change of pile intensity. Fermi made another calculation. The pile was nearly critical. He asked that ZIP be slid in. That adjustment brought the neutron count down. This time, he told Weil, take the control rod out twelve inches, Weil withdrew the cadmium rod. Fermi nodded and ZIP was winched out as well. This is going to do it, Fermi told Compton. The director of the plutonium project had found a place for himself at Fermi s side. Now it will become self-sustaining. The trace [on the recorder) will climb and continue to dimb it will not level off. ... 

The JOYO operators control the reactor power, i.e. neutron flux level, by adjusting the position of the control rod subassemblies in the core. This is a manual operation performed from the central control room. To improve operational reliability as well as to reduce the mental load on the operators, an automatic control rod operation system [16] has been developed. This system has the following capabilities ... 

---