Consequences goal setting

The purposeful manipulation of the human brain (domestication) is the sine qua non for the establishment and maintenance of a community. As a rule, education from birth until sexual maturity determines irreversibly the most important goals of the individual. Exceptions are few. Those of the exclusive society who command over others and obtain via proper education the power over their subjects have always developed proper ideologies to efficiently exercise their power. They manipulate their dependants even to sacrifice their lives when needed to reach the goals set by the authorities. The billions who remained during the history of mankind untouched by their wartime killings of the masses of their innocent peers and were ready to die in the name of God , fatherland and so on illustrate the consequences of the practically unlimited capacity of the human brain to fix ICRs and acquire drives. 

It is interesting to note that this model infers that an accident occurs as a consequence of goal setting followed by a human decision. Any error may be attributed to human behaviour, perception, cognitive skills and experience, factors which have been widely used in other accident models. 

The technical differences between site problems at RCRA facilities and CERCLA sites sometimes may be difficult to distinguish, owing to similarities in present or past uses of the site, in hydrogeologic setting, and/or in the types of substances disposed, spilled, or otherwise managed at the site. Consequently, many technical aspects of the study and remediation of releases of hazardous wastes and constituents from RCRA facilities often will closely parallel those at Superfund sites, and cleanups under both statutes must achieve similar goals for protection of public health and the environment. Additionally, activities which would be termed removal actions or expedited response actions under CERCLA may be undertaken by owners and operators under RCRA. In the RCRA context, such actions are termed interim measures, as will be discussed in subsequent chapters. 

A goal is often achieved by multiple primitive (e.g., valve) operations. All the primitive operations that will together result in violation of a constraint will be Qobberers of that constraint. Consequently, the first step in the quantitative constraint-posting methodology is to identify abstracted operators as the sets of primitive operations. This is accomplished through the following procedure ... 

The requirements for the collection of representative samples are documented in the SAP. If all of these requirements are met in the course of field implementation, the collected samples will be representative of the population of interest. The goal for sampling completeness will be also met. Deviations from the SAP requirements have a potential to degrade the DQIs of representativeness and completeness and, consequently, the usability of a data set. The most damaging errors that may take place during field implementation are the collection of unrepresentative samples incomplete sampling that produces data gaps and incomplete documentation that... 

---