Confidence lengths

To derive this result we only have to rely on Eq. (54) and the idea that the distribution of errors is a normal distribution. Of course, the error in the Taylor expansions is not just a function of distance, it is also a function of direction. Hence, a better model would assign each Taylor expansion confidence lengths for each direction in space. For various reasons, it is much simpler to associate a confidence length with each element of Z, and to define the weight function as... 

The confidence lengths, dn(i), have been derived from a Bayesian analysis of the errors in the gradients64 ... 

Figure 1.3. Frontier orbital energies (eV) and confidents for acrolein and protonated acrolein. In the latter case the upper numbers refer to the situation where bond lengths and angles correspond to those of acrolein. The lower numbers are more suitable for a hydroxyallyl cation. The actual situation is assumed to be intermediate. The data are taken from ref. 104.

The idea behind OELs is to identify the highest level of exposure concentration and the corresponding reference time period for which we can be confident that there will be no adverse effects on health. However, the concentrations and lengths of exposure at which the presence of airborne chemical agents could damage health have not been clear for many years, and even today there are many questions to be answered. 

Our understanding of seasonal and interannual variation in global terrestrial vegetation dynamics is, however, very sketchy at present. Ecosystem respiration measurements have been made for various soil-vegetation types for variable lengths of time Relationships between ecosystem respiration and weather data have been derived from these data for four major biomes 88), However, additional systematic collection of field respiration measurements would be necessary for placing much confidence in such a relationship. 

The sets of technically and statistically acceptable results are represented in the form of bar-charts of which an example is given for Cu in Figure 3.1. The length of a bar corresponds to the 95 % confidence interval of the mean. The certified values... 

This strategy permits one to test the validity of macroscopic theories on microscopic length scales, the reliability of experimental techniques and, vice versa, the appropriateness of the CFD treatment. Furthermore, having put the simulations on a safe basis also enables one to predict transport features outside the experimentally accessible parameter range with some confidence of reliability [8]. 

It is important that a measurement made in one laboratory by a particular analyst can be repeated by other analysts in the same laboratory or in another laboratory, even where the other laboratory may be in a different country. We aim to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. We are all confident that if we measure the length of a piece of wire, mass of a chemical or the time in any laboratory, we will get, very nearly, the same answer, no matter where we are. The reason for this is that there are international standards of length, mass and time. In order to obtain comparable results, the measuring devices need to be calibrated. For instance, balances are calibrated by using a standard mass, which can be traced to the primary mass standard (see also Chapter 5). The primary standard in chemistry is the amount of substance, i.e. the mole. It is not usually possible to trace all of our measurements back to the mole. We generally trace measurements to other SI units, e.g. mass as in 40 mg kg-1 or trace back to reference materials which are themselves traceable to SI units. 

Calibration curve quality. Calibration curve quality is usually evaluated by statistical parameters, such as the correlation coefficient and standard error of estimate, and by empirical indexes, such as the length of the linear range. Using confidence band statistics, curve quality can be better described in terms of confidence band widths at several key concentrations. Other semi-quantitative indexes become redundant. Alternatively, the effects of curve quality can be incorporated into statements of sample analysis data quality. 

At any transformation level if the minimum F statistic were less than or equal to the critical F value, our work was done and the confidence band calculations began. Otherwise we either accepted a lack of fit (and would note it in published results), segmented the graph to shorter lengths, or sought a non-linear or higher order model. 

In this notation, N d is the number of independent samples contained in the trajectory, and fsim the length of the trajectory. The standard error can be used to approximate confidence intervals, with a rule of thumb being that + 2SE represents roughly a 95% confidence interval [26]. The actual interval depends on the underlying distribution and the sampling quality as embodied in Nfd fSimA/ see ref. 25 for a more careful discussion. 

Fig. 3.9 Effect of Al-substitution in synthetic hematites on (Left) the unit cell edge length a of hematites synthesized at various temperatures (Stanjek Schwertmann, 1992, with permission), and (Right) the magnetic hyperfine field Bhf of hematites formed at 70 °C and 1000°C dotted lines indicate 95% confidence limits (Murad Schwertmann 1986 with permission).

The equations discussed in the previous chapter, that described the variance per unit length of a solute band after passing through an LC column, were all significantly different. It is, therefore, necessary to identify the specific equation that most accurately describes the dispersion that takes place, so that it can be employed with confidence in the design of optimized columns. The different equations were tested against an extensive set of accurately measured experimental data by Katz et at (1) and, in order to identify the most pertinent equation, their data and some of their conclusions will be considered in this chapter. 

Calibration is invariably based on spheres, which means that an instrument can be used with confidence only for such particles. Of course, a response will duly be recorded if a nonspherical particle passes through the scattering volume. But what is the meaning of the equivalent radius corresponding to that response Is it the radius of a sphere of equal cross-sectional area Or equal surface area Or equal volume Or perhaps equal mean chord length Answers to these questions depend on the particular instrument and nonspherical particle comprehensive answers do not come easily because it is difficult to do calculations for nonspherical particles, even those of regular shape. 

Our considerations are valid only for error-free observations since with errors in A the inequalities (1.87) are not necessarily true. It is far from easy to extend this method to the real situation. In (ref. 19) the authors increased each observed A values by the half-length of the confidence intervals (for definition see Chapter 3), i.e., replaced (1.87) by inequalities... 

---