Conductivity mismatch

Rashba El (2000) Theory of electrical spin injection tunnel contacts as a solution of the conductivity mismatch problem. Phys Rev B 62 R16267-R16270... 

As a result, nearly perfect interfaces between the ferromagnetic material and the semiconductor are not a prerequisite for efficient spin injection. It is for example possible to insert a non-magnetic seed layer between the ferromagnetic base layer and the semiconductor collector. Since hot electrons retain their spin moment while traversing the thin non-magnetic layer this will not drastically reduce the spin polarization of the injected current. Finally, since electron injection is ballistic in SVT and MTT devices the spin injection efficiency is not fundamentally limited by a substantial conductivity mismatch between metals and semiconductors [161, 162], The latter is the case in diffusive ferromagnetic metal/semiconductor contacts [163],... 

Pending further work on these new magnetic semiconductors, metallic ferromagnets are in principle, the most convenient spin polarized sources for spin device work. The obvious configuration of direct Ohmic contact between metal and semiconductor proved to have fundamental shortcomings. The conductivity mismatch between the two materials implies very indifferent spin injection efficiency [174, 175], However it transpires that this difficulty is surmountable [176] by placing a tunnel barrier between the... 

Exceedingly large losses at low frequencies above 150°C are attributed to Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars (NWS) polarizations arising from conduction mismatches at the structural interfaces between a continuous matrix of amorphous polycarbonate and a crystalline or densified second phase. Provided that the discontinuous phase tends towards a two-dimensional aspect and has a conductivity less than that of the matrix, theory predicts substantial NWS losses even with a low concentration of the discontinous phase [37]. 

The conduction model is thought to be only valid for ER. suspensions in reaction with dc or low frequency ac fields. For high frequency ac fields, the polarization model is dominant [55,56]. As shown in Eq. (25) and (26), once the Wagncr-Maxwcll polarization is taken into account, the parameter P is detennined by the conductivity mismatch in dc or low frequency ac fields, and by the dielectric mismatch in high frequency fields (the low or high frequency is relative to the relaxation time of the Wagner-Maxwell polarization). The parameter p in the conduction model is ... 

Another potential problem is due to rotor instability caused by gas dynamic forces. The frequency of this occurrence is non-synchronous. This has been described as aerodynamic forces set up within an impeller when the rotational axis is not coincident with the geometric axis. The verification of a compressor train requires a test at full pressure and speed. Aerodynamic cross-coupling, the interaction of the rotor mechanically with the gas flow in the compressor, can be predicted. A caution flag should be raised at this point because the full-pressure full-speed tests as normally conducted are not Class IASME performance tests. This means the staging probably is mismatched and can lead to other problems [22], It might also be appropriate to caution the reader this test is expensive. 

It has been noted that the conductivity and activation energy can be correlated with the ionic radius of the dopant ions, with a minimum in activation energy occurring for those dopants whose radius most closely matches that of Ce4+. Kilner et al. [83] suggested that it would be more appropriate to evaluate the relative ion mismatch of dopant and host by comparing the cubic lattice parameter of the relevant rare-earth oxide. Kim [84] extended this approach by a systematic analysis of the effect of dopant ionic radius upon the relevant host lattice and gave the following empirical relation between the lattice constant of doped-ceria solid solutions and the ionic radius of the dopants. 

The general requirements for an SOFC anode material include [1-3] good chemical and thermal stability during fuel cell fabrication and operation, high electronic conductivity under fuel cell operating conditions, excellent catalytic activity toward the oxidation of fuels, manageable mismatch in coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) with adjacent cell components, sufficient mechanical strength and flexibility, ease of fabrication into desired microstructures (e.g., sufficient porosity and surface area), and low cost. Further, ionic conductivity would be beneficial to the extension of... 

The successful operation of SOFCs requires individual cell components that are thermally compatible so that stable interfaces are established at 1000°C (1832°F), i.e., thermal expansion coefficients for cell components must be closely matched to reduce stresses arising from differential thermal expansion between components. Fortunately, the electrolyte, interconnection, and cathode listed in Table 8-1 have reasonably close thermal expansion coefficients [i.e., 10 cm/cm°C from room temperature to 1000°C (1832°F)]. An anode made of 100 mol% nickel would have excellent electrical conductivity. However, the thermal expansion coefficient of 100 mol% nickel would be 50% greater than the ceramic electrolyte, or the cathode tube, which causes a thermal mismatch. This thermal mismatch has been resolved by mixing ceramic powders with Ni or NiO. The trade-off of the amount of Ni (to achieve high conductivity) and amount of ceramic (to better match the other component thermal coefficients of expansion) is Ni/YSZ 30/70, by volume (1). 

The configuration of the chiral BlNOLate backbone of the phosphoramidite ligand affects the rates and enantioselectivities of allylic substitution reactions. Hartwig and coworkers found that allylic substitution conducted with a catalyst derived from the simplified ligand (5a,/ )-L4 occurred more slowly than that conducted with a catalyst derived from (/ a,/ )-L4 [74]. Complexes of the mismatched (5a,/ )-L4 undergo cyclometalation slowly. The products formed from reactions catalyzed by complexes of (5a,/ )-L4 and (/ a,/ )-L4 have the opposite absolute configuration. 

---