Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conductivity measurements representation

Figure 6.1 Schematic representation of cells used for ionic conductivity measurement by impedance method as an exampie. (a) Solid-state samples (b) liquid-state samples. Figure 6.1 Schematic representation of cells used for ionic conductivity measurement by impedance method as an exampie. (a) Solid-state samples (b) liquid-state samples.
Figure 8 Representation of an electrodeless conductivity measuring circuit. (From Light TS and Ewing GW (1990) Measurement of electrolytic conductance. In Ewing GW (ed.) Analytical Instmmentation Handbook, pp. 641-658. New York Dekker.)... Figure 8 Representation of an electrodeless conductivity measuring circuit. (From Light TS and Ewing GW (1990) Measurement of electrolytic conductance. In Ewing GW (ed.) Analytical Instmmentation Handbook, pp. 641-658. New York Dekker.)...
Conductance measurements have also been used in electrolytes for determination of composition fluctuation. Most of the techniques mentioned above are appropriate to investigate both the time, and spectral, representation of fluctuations. The scope, and limits of, the experimental techniques for determining the composition fluctuation was analysed by Magde (1977). [Pg.127]

An example of direct measurements based on the frequency representation of fluctuation is the study of the association-dissociation reaction of BeS04 in a 0.03 M solution, with conductance measurements (Feher Weismann, 1973). It is particularly interesting that they could increase the ratio of the reaction noise to Johnson noise of the circuit, since the former is a quadratic function of the applied direct voltage, while the latter is independent of the voltage. [Pg.128]

FIGURE Iti Schematic representation of magnetically forced alignment of the side chain liquid crystalline mono-substituted polyacetylene and sample cell for the four-probe method of electrical conductivity measurement. [Pg.1007]

Single representation of an electrodeless conductivity measuring circuit. [Pg.431]

Figure 5.18. Schematic representation of the density of states N(E) in the conduction band and of the definitions of work function d>, chemical potential of electrons p, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level p, surface potential x> Galvani (or inner) potential

Figure 5.18. Schematic representation of the density of states N(E) in the conduction band and of the definitions of work function d>, chemical potential of electrons p, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level p, surface potential x> Galvani (or inner) potential <p and Volta (or outer) potential T for the catalyst (W) and for the reference electrode (R). The measured potential difference Uwr is by definition the difference in Fermi levels <p, p and p are spatially uniform O and can vary locally on the metal sample surfaces and the T potentials vanish, on the average, for the (effective double layer covered) gas-exposed catalyst and reference electrode surfaces.32 Reprinted with permission from The Electrochemical Society.
The trial burn can be seen as the test drive of the incinerator. It is the time when the owner/ operator will bring the unit up to operational readiness, monitor the key operating conditions, and measure the emissions. The trial burn test conditions are based on the operating conditions proposed by the permit applicant in the trial bum plan submitted to U.S. EPA for evaluation. U.S. EPA establishes conditions in the permit necessary to conduct an effective trial bum, meaning that the burn will be representational of the incinerator s intended day-to-day operation and will yield meaningful data for analysis. [Pg.964]

Figure 25a, as an example, shows the potential dependence of the single-junction conductances of 44-BP measured in 0.1 M HCIO4 solution (pH 1) in —0.10 V < E < 0.90 V in a semi-logarithmic representation. The values of L, M, and H decrease with more positive electrode potentials, and follow nearly the same trend for each family. The single-junction conductances decrease by a factor of 3-5 upon potential excursion towards positive values in the accessible potential region. A similar trend is also observed for electrolytes with variable pH ranging between 1 and 10, as... [Pg.163]

The defect population in the doped solid under moist conditions then consists of V%, OHo, h, and Y /x. The domains over which each species is dominant for conductivity can be represented diagrammatically when data concerning the conductivity of the solid has been measured (Fig. 8.20). In this representation, the conductivity fields are bounded by lines tracing the locus where the transport number for a pair of defects is equal to 0.5. (The diagram could equally well be drawn in terms of domains delineating the defect species that predominate.)... [Pg.390]

Fig. 3. Coverage of chemistry space by four overlapping sublibraries. (A) Different diversity libraries cover similar chemistry space but show little overlap. This shows three libraries chosen using different dissimilarity measures to act as different representations of the available chemistry space. The compounds from these libraries are presented in this representation by first calculating the intermolecular similarity of each of the compounds to all of the other compounds using fingerprint descriptors and the Tanimoto similarity index. Principal component analysis was then conducted on the similarity matrix to reduce it to a series of principal components that allow the chemistry space to be presented in three dimensions. Fig. 3. Coverage of chemistry space by four overlapping sublibraries. (A) Different diversity libraries cover similar chemistry space but show little overlap. This shows three libraries chosen using different dissimilarity measures to act as different representations of the available chemistry space. The compounds from these libraries are presented in this representation by first calculating the intermolecular similarity of each of the compounds to all of the other compounds using fingerprint descriptors and the Tanimoto similarity index. Principal component analysis was then conducted on the similarity matrix to reduce it to a series of principal components that allow the chemistry space to be presented in three dimensions.
Schematic representation of the heart and normal cardiac electrical activity (intracellular recordings from areas indicated and ECG). Sinoatrial (SA) node, atrioventricular (AV) node, and Purkinje cells display pacemaker activity (phase 4 depolarization). The ECG is the body surface manifestation of the depolarization and repolarization waves of the heart. The P wave is generated by atrial depolarization, the QRS by ventricular muscle depolarization, and the T wave by ventricular repolarization. Thus, the PR interval is a measure of conduction time from atrium to ventricle, and the QRS duration indicates the time required for all of the ventricular cells to be activated (ie, the intraventricular conduction time). The QT interval reflects the duration of the ventricular action potential. Schematic representation of the heart and normal cardiac electrical activity (intracellular recordings from areas indicated and ECG). Sinoatrial (SA) node, atrioventricular (AV) node, and Purkinje cells display pacemaker activity (phase 4 depolarization). The ECG is the body surface manifestation of the depolarization and repolarization waves of the heart. The P wave is generated by atrial depolarization, the QRS by ventricular muscle depolarization, and the T wave by ventricular repolarization. Thus, the PR interval is a measure of conduction time from atrium to ventricle, and the QRS duration indicates the time required for all of the ventricular cells to be activated (ie, the intraventricular conduction time). The QT interval reflects the duration of the ventricular action potential.
Special interest adheres to the group of cholinesterases (ChE), not only in view of their physiological role in conductive tissues, but also because their specific behavior towards substrates and inhibitors and their high efficiency towards cationic substrates permit exact kinetic measurements. In spite of an enormous amount of experimental work, the exact structure of the active surface of cholinesterases is still controversial [see the review of Whittaker (/)]. The following representation will discuss the results already achieved and point out the many problems in this field still awaiting solution. [Pg.131]

It is now necessary to describe the determination of conductivity in ionic solids. The circuit shown in Figure 8.9 is only a schematic representation. This type of measurement in high-impedance samples of ionic solids causes experimental problems that are avoided with the help of the so-called guard ring circuit, which prevents leakage currents affecting the measurement [16]. Besides, these circuits use an amplifier to deal with the high resistance of the sample. [Pg.384]


See other pages where Conductivity measurements representation is mentioned: [Pg.270]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.1004]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.224]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Conductance measurements

Conductance measurment

Conduction measurements

Conductivity measurements

© 2024 chempedia.info