Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sphere theory, concentric

The outer and core radii were determined from optical resonance measurements using Mie theory solutions (Aden and Kerker, 1951 Bohren and Huffman, 1983) for concentric spheres to interpret the resonance spectra. Figure 36 presents some of the data of Ray et al. for a pure component glycerol droplet and for a coated droplet having an initial coating thickness given by yo = 0-321. Here y is a reduced thickness defined by y = (a - aj/a. [Pg.67]

We propose a single quantitative hydrodynamic model theory of microscopic viscosity that fits the data very well (the solid line. Figure 7) yet contains only two parameters. Once again, consider a spherical protein of radius r in solvent, this time enclosed by an outer concentric sphere of radius R as a boundary. It is known from classical hydrodynamics (1 ) that as R is reduced from 00, the drag on the protein, if it is rotated, increases as though the viscosity ij of the solvent increased from the free solvent value t/j, as... [Pg.173]

In the first set, diffusion theory calculations are performed if no thin regions, such as tank walls, are included. When such regions are considered, DTF calculations in the S approximation are done. In these calculations, the metal density is 18 g/cm, tite uranium isotopic composition is 93.19 wt% " U and 6.81 wt% and all regions are concentric spheres. The princlpu variables are the metal mass, the solution volume, and the concentration of uranium in solution. [Pg.282]

In this section we describe the equations required to simulate the electrochemical performance of porous electrodes with concentrated electrolytes. Extensions to this basic model are presented in Section 4. The basis of porous electrode theory and concentrated solution theory has been reviewed by Newman and Tiedemann [1]. In porous electrode theory, the exact positions and shapes of aU the particles and pores in the electrode are not specified. Instead, properties are averaged over a volume small with respect to the overall dimensions of the electrode but large with respect to the pore structure. The electrode is viewed as a superposition of active material, filler, and electrolyte, and these phases coexist at every point in the model. Particles of the active material generally can be treated as spheres. The electrode phase is coupled to the electrolyte phase via mass balances and via the reaction rate, which depends on the potential difference between the phases. AU phases are considered to be electrically neutral, which assumes that the volume of the double layer is smaU relative to the pore volume. Where pUcable, we also indicate boundary conditions that would be used if a Uthium foil electrode were used in place of a negative insertion electrode. [Pg.347]

How can Equation (11.79) be solved Before computers were available only simple ihapes could be considered. For example, proteins were modelled as spheres or ellipses Tanford-Kirkwood theory) DNA as a uniformly charged cylinder and membranes as planes (Gouy-Chapman theory). With computers, numerical approaches can be used to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. A variety of numerical methods can be employed, including finite element and boundary element methods, but we will restrict our discussion to the finite difference method first introduced for proteins by Warwicker and Watson [Warwicker and Watson 1982]. Several groups have implemented this method here we concentrate on the work of Honig s group, whose DelPhi program has been widely used. [Pg.620]

The simplest indicator of conformation comes not from but the sedimentation concentration dependence coefficient, ks. Wales and Van Holde [106] were the first to show that the ratio of fcs to the intrinsic viscosity, [/ ] was a measure of particle conformation. It was shown empirically by Creeth and Knight [107] that this has a value of 1.6 for compact spheres and non-draining coils, and adopted lower values for more extended structures. Rowe [36,37] subsequently provided a derivation for rigid particles, a derivation later supported by Lavrenko and coworkers [10]. The Rowe theory assumed there were no free-draining effects and also that the solvent had suf-... [Pg.236]

This equation is identical to the Maxwell [236,237] solution originally derived for electrical conductivity in a dilute suspension of spheres. Hashin and Shtrikman [149] using variational theory showed that Maxwell s equation is in fact an upper bound for the relative diffusion coefficients in isotropic medium for any concentration of suspended spheres and even for cases where the solid portions of the medium are not spheres. However, they also noted that a reduced upper bound may be obtained if one includes additional statistical descriptions of the medium other than the void fraction. Weissberg [419] demonstrated that this was indeed true when additional geometrical parameters are included in the calculations. Batchelor and O Brien [34] further extended the Maxwell approach. [Pg.572]

Unlike solid electrodes, the shape of the ITIES can be varied by application of an external pressure to the pipette. The shape of the meniscus formed at the pipette tip was studied in situ by video microscopy under controlled pressure [19]. When a negative pressure was applied, the ITIES shape was concave. As expected from the theory [25a], the diffusion current to a recessed ITIES was lower than in absence of negative external pressure. When a positive pressure was applied to the pipette, the solution meniscus became convex, and the diffusion current increased. The diffusion-limiting current increased with increasing height of the spherical segment (up to the complete sphere), as the theory predicts [25b]. Importantly, with no external pressure applied to the pipette, the micro-ITIES was found to be essentially flat. This observation was corroborated by numerous experiments performed with different concentrations of dissolved species and different pipette radii [19]. The measured diffusion current to such an interface agrees quantitatively with Eq. (6) if the outer pipette wall is silanized (see next section). The effective radius of a pipette can be calculated from Eq. (6) and compared to the value found microscopically [19]. [Pg.387]

M. Tokuyama and I. Oppenheim, On the theory of concentrated hard-sphere suspensions, Physica A 216, 85 (1995). [Pg.143]

When the radius of an aerosol particle, r, is of the order of the mean free path, i, of gas molecules, neither the diffusion nor the kinetic theory can be considered to be strictly valid. Arendt and Kallman (1926), Lassen and Rau (1960) and Fuchs (1964) have derived attachment theories for the transition region, r, which, for very small particles, reduce to the gas kinetic theory, and, for large particles, reduce to the classical diffusion theory. The underlying assumptions of the hybrid theories are summarized by Van Pelt (1971) as follows 1. the diffusion theory applies to the transport of unattached radon progeny across an imaginary sphere of radius r + i centred on the aerosol particle and 2. kinetic theory predicts the attachment of radon progeny to the particle based on a uniform concentration of radon atoms corresponding to the concentration at a radius of r + L... [Pg.145]

We present an improved model for the flocculation of a dispersion of hard spheres in the presence of non-adsorbing polymer. The pair potential is derived from a recent theory for interacting polymer near a flat surface, and is a function of the depletion thickness. This thickness is of the order of the radius of gyration in dilute polymer solutions but decreases when the coils in solution begin to overlap. Flocculation occurs when the osmotic attraction energy, which is a consequence of the depletion, outweighs the loss in configurational entropy of the dispersed particles. Our analysis differs from that of De Hek and Vrij with respect to the dependence of the depletion thickness on the polymer concentration (i.e., we do not consider the polymer coils to be hard spheres) and to the stability criterion used (binodal, not spinodal phase separation conditions). [Pg.245]

Any fundamental study of the rheology of concentrated suspensions necessitates the use of simple systems of well-defined geometry and where the surface characteristics of the particles are well established. For that purpose well-characterized polymer particles of narrow size distribution are used in aqueous or non-aqueous systems. For interpretation of the rheological results, the inter-particle pair-potential must be well-defined and theories must be available for its calculation. The simplest system to consider is that where the pair potential may be represented by a hard sphere model. This, for example, is the case for polystyrene latex dispersions in organic solvents such as benzyl alcohol or cresol, whereby electrostatic interactions are well screened (1). Concentrated dispersions in non-polar media in which the particles are stabilized by a "built-in" stabilizer layer, may also be used, since the pair-potential can be represented by a hard-sphere interaction, where the hard sphere radius is given by the particles radius plus the adsorbed layer thickness. Systems of this type have been recently studied by Croucher and coworkers. (10,11) and Strivens (12). [Pg.412]

Smoluchowski, who worked on the rate of coagulation of colloidal particles, was a pioneer in the development of the theory of diffusion-controlled reactions. His theory is based on the assumption that the probability of reaction is equal to 1 when A and B are at the distance of closest approach (Rc) ( absorbing boundary condition ), which corresponds to an infinite value of the intrinsic rate constant kR. The rate constant k for the dissociation of the encounter pair can thus be ignored. As a result of this boundary condition, the concentration of B is equal to zero on the surface of a sphere of radius Rc, and consequently, there is a concentration gradient of B. The rate constant for reaction k (t) can be obtained from the flux of B, in the concentration gradient, through the surface of contact with A. This flux depends on the radial distribution function of B, p(r, t), which is a solution of Fick s equation... [Pg.80]

Adsorption of Ag on the surface of PdO is also an interesting option offered by colloidal oxide synthesis. Silver is a well-known promoter for the improvement of catalytic properties, primarily selectivity, in various reactions such as hydrogenation of polyunsaturated compounds." The more stable oxidation state of silver is -F1 Aquo soluble precursors are silver nitrate (halide precursors are aU insoluble), and some organics such as acetate or oxalate with limited solubility may also be used." Ag" " is a d ° ion and can easily form linear AgL2 type complexes according to crystal field theory. Nevertheless, even for a concentrated solution of AgNOs, Ag+ does not form aquo complexes." Although a solvation sphere surrounds the cation, no metal-water chemical bonds have been observed. [Pg.278]

The influence of surfactant structure on the nature of the microemulsion formed can also be predicted from the thermodynamic theory by Overbeek (17,18). According to this theory, the most stable microemulsion would be that in which the phase with the smaller volume fraction forms the droplets, since the osmotic term increases with increasing i. For w/o microemulsion prepared using an ionic surfactant, the hard sphere volume is only slightly larger than the water volume, since the hydrocarbon tails of the surfactant may interpenetrate to a certain extent, when two droplets come close together. For an oil in water microemulsion, on the other hand, the double layer may extend to a considerable extent, depending on the electrolyte concentration... [Pg.162]


See other pages where Sphere theory, concentric is mentioned: [Pg.280]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.805]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.135]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.280 ]




SEARCH



Concentration theory

© 2024 chempedia.info