Concentration dependent transitions

In general, these mixed monolayers seem to be destabilized by the presence of Azone, which causes a concentration-dependent transition from solid or liquid condensed behavior to a liquid expanded type of film. There is also substantial evidence that squeeze-out of Azone occurs in all cases and at similar pressures. It is therefore possible that Azone can exist as a separate phase in stratum comeum lipids at a lower pressure than in monolayers of DPPC. In either case it seems likely that Azone may well exist in pools in the stratum comeum. 

Branched polymers in solution also show concentration-dependent transitions in viscosity. Copolymers of poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-ethylene isophthalate) (P(ET-co-EI)) were prepared by the polycondensation reaction of an equimolar mixture of dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and dimethyl isophthalate (DM1) in the presence of a 100% excess of ethylene glycol (EG) (Scheme 3.1). Chain branching was introduced into the polymer using a tri-functional anhydride or a tricarboxylate at a level of 1 -1.5 molar percent. The concentration dependence of viscosity for these polymers were Tjsp ... 

Samples can be concentrated beyond tire glass transition. If tliis is done quickly enough to prevent crystallization, tliis ultimately leads to a random close-packed stmcture, witli a volume fraction (j) 0.64. Close-packed stmctures, such as fee, have a maximum packing density of (]) p = 0.74. The crystallization kinetics are strongly concentration dependent. The nucleation rate is fastest near tire melting concentration. On increasing concentration, tire nucleation process is arrested. This has been found to occur at tire glass transition [82]. 

Because of the close similarity in shape of the profiles shown in Fig. 16-27 (as well as likely variations in parameters e.g., concentration-dependent surface diffusion coefficient), a contrdling mechanism cannot be rehably determined from transition shape. If rehable correlations are not available and rate parameters cannot be measured in independent experiments, then particle diameters, velocities, and other factors should be varied ana the obsei ved impacl considered in relation to the definitions of the numbers of transfer units. 

We, therefore, conclude that the concentration dependence of the experimental rate gives the composition of the transition state in this example the transition state is composed of one molecule of A and one of B, for the experimental rate constant is first-order in each reactant. 

Equation (7) is log-normal symmetric in weight fraction for e = 1 (Fig. 2). In this case, it describes systems in which there are no concentration-dependent phase transitions of any kind. In other words, Eq. (7) should... 

The strong emphasis placed on concentration dependences in Chapters 2-5 was there for a reason. The algebraic form of the rate law reveals, in a straightforward manner, the elemental composition of the transition state—the atoms present and the net ionic charge, if any. This information is available for each of the elementary reactions that can become a rate-controlling step under the conditions studied. From the form of the rate law, one can deduce the number of steps in the scheme. In most cases, further information can be obtained about the pattern in which parallel and sequential steps are arranged. 

The concentration dependences in the rate law establish the elemental composition of the transition state and its charge. 

The two rate laws are kinetically indistinguishable, because they give the same functional dependence on concentration. The transition states for the two mechanisms contain the elements of acetal and a proton ( H20). Other features may allow one mechanism or the other to be assigned to a given acetal, but kinetics alone will not... 

Only true rate constants (i.e., those with no unresolved concentration dependences) can properly be treated by the Arrhenius or transition state models. Meaningful values are not obtained if pseudo-order rate constants or the rates themselves are correlated by Eq. (7-1) or Eq. (7-2). This error is found not uncommonly in the literature. The activation parameters from such calculations, A and AS in particular, are meaningless. 

The dipole interaction depends on the distance between the ions (6.4). Therefore, the transition probability increases with increasing concentration of magnetic ions. Studies of the concentration dependence of the relaxation can be conveniently performed on samples of amorphous frozen solutions with a uniform distribution... 

Fig. 65. Concentration dependence of the hydrodynamic screening length (c). The solid line represents the result of the simultaneous fit, the dashed line in correlation length (c) related to the transition from single to many chain behavior. (Reprinted with permission from [40]. Copyright 1984 American Chemical Society, Washington)...

P has a very suggestive form in relation to Figure 8.26. For a large concentration of acceptors, the second term in the denominator can be made considerably smaller than 1 (i.e., Xt is proportional to acceptor concentration [A]), and P will be independent of concentration. On the other hand, for a small concentration of acceptors, the second term in the denominator can be made considerably larger than 1, and P will fall off linearly as the concentration is reduced. The scale factor in all of this is Q. With Q large, the transition from concentration independence to linear concentration dependence will be at low acceptor concentrations. P falls to 5 when the second term in the denominator of Eq. (8.27) is equal to 1, and so a critical concentration of acceptors [A], /2 can be defined to characterize the falloff. Expressing Xt in terms of molecular parameters (x, = em[A] ln(10)/, where n is the particle refractive index, em is the molar decadic extinction coefficient, [A] is the concentration of acceptors, and k is 2n/X) yields... 

---