Compliance testing test conditions

This article outlines the food contact legislation in the UK that applies to plastic articles and materials that come into contact with food. Key requirements are that materials must not transfer chemicals to food in quantities that cause a hazard to human health, or cause the food to become tainted with a strange taste or odour. The regulations also set out testing conditions that enable compliance with the requirements to be demonstrated. 

When considering the use of retarding admixtures in situations where the temperature exceeds 30°C, the relevance of the ASTM C 494 compliance test data (done under laboratory conditions) to the field conditions the concrete will experience must be considered. The actual temperatures experienced in most hot-weather countries (> 40°C) go beyond the scope of many current recommended practices. For example the ACI guide to hot-weather concreting (ACI 305 R-89) does not meet the needs of, and is not practical... 

An example of an evaluation undertaken according to this protocol is for the measurement of benzene in ambient air by tube type samplers subject to thermal desorption (EN, 2005b) and samplers subject to solvent desorption (EN, 2005a). These standards were developed specifically to provide measurement methods meeting requirements for checking compliance with the air quality standard for benzene set by the European Ambient Air Quality Directive (Directive 96/62/EC, 1996). Evaluation of published data concerning the samplers under the test conditions enabled an evaluation of the expanded relative uncertainty of measurement at a limit value (5 pgnT3) for benzene in air and for solvent and thermally desorbed samplers a value of 13.4% was obtained. 

Although variability is inherent in all environmental measurements, a variety of physical, chemical, and biological factors should be noted in compliance biomonitoring to enhance the consistency and de-fensibility of toxicity test results. These various parameters may affect the effluent toxicity to aquatic biota, and it is important that the investigator take them into account. Test conditions should mimic receiving water conditions, whenever feasible, to allow accurate assessment of the in-stream effect of an effluent. However, the use of upstream water for dilution should be avoided due to the potential variability in quality, or toxicity, over the testing period. 

There are a number of ways out of these situations. In the first instance and with regard to the simple stability data for the test item under storage and test conditions , the Study Director could (and should) exclude these data from his/her Compliance Statement, if they were not provided by the sponsor. This solution may, however, not be liked by the sponsor, since it might be... 

In the Bueehe-Halpin theory the necessity of a strong filler-rubber bond follows naturally from the requirement of a low creep compliance. On the other hand the hysteresis criterion of failure, Eq. (32), does not make the need for filler-rubber adhesion immediately obvious. It is clear, however, that Hb cannot exceed Ub. In absence of a strong filler-rubber bond, the stress will never attain a high value the only way for Ub to become large would be for eb to increase considerably. There is no reason, however, why under these conditions eb should be much greater than in the unfilled rubber at the same test conditions and, in any case, it will be limited by the so-called ultimate elongation . This is the maximum value of eh on the failure envelope and is a fundamental property of polymeric networks. The ultimate extension ratio is given by theory (2/7) as the square root of the number of statistical links per network chain, n,... 

Facilities conduct compliance tests under the maximum conditions where problems with low heating values are unlikely. In practice, flares are not always operated at these ideal rates. 

Modulus values at low frequency are related to the wetting and creep behavior of the adhesives. The frequency range is not quite quantified since it is dependent on the creep testing conditions but, in the past, Dahlquist used 1-sec creep compliance [7(0] to correlate its wetting behavior. The creep compliance value can be approximated from the modulus G value using the following equations, which were derived by Riande and Markovitz( > ... 

The scatter in the values after exclusion of outliers is 3-38 % of the mean, depending on the test. Apart from the very low scatter in the quick-stick method, the scatter is lower for methods with longer contact times. Prerequisites for such results are very uniformly defined test specimens and exact compliance with defined test conditions [27]. 

We have defined the various types of enclosures adopted by various manufacturers to suit different locations and environmental conditions in Tables 1.10 and 1.11. Here we briefly discuss methods for testing these enclosures to check their compliance with defined requirements. 

---