Complex I and

An active catalytic species in the dimerization reaction is Pd(0) complex, which forms the bis-7r-allylpalladium complex 3, The formation of 1,3,7-octa-triene (7) is understood by the elimination of/5-hydrogen from the intermediate complex 1 to give 4 and its reductive elimination. In telomer formation, a nucleophile reacts with butadiene to form the dimeric telomers in which the nucleophile is introduced mainly at the terminal position to form the 1-substituted 2,7-octadiene 5. As a minor product, the isomeric 3-substituted 1,7-octadiene 6 is formed[13,14]. The dimerization carried out in MeOD produces l-methoxy-6-deuterio-2,7-octadiene (10) as a main product 15]. This result suggests that the telomers are formed by the 1,6- and 3,6-additions of MeO and D to the intermediate complexes I and 2. 

The final step of the reaction involves the transfer of two electrons from iron-sulfur clusters to coenzyme Q. Coenzyme Q is a mobile electron carrier. Its isoprenoid tail makes it highly hydrophobic, and it diffuses freely in the hydrophobic core of the inner mitochondrial membrane. As a result, it shuttles electrons from Complexes I and II to Complex III. The redox cycle of UQ is shown in Figure 21.5, and the overall scheme is shown schematically in Figure 21.6. 

When induced in macrophages, iNOS produces large amounts of NO which represents a major cytotoxic principle of those cells. Due to its affinity to protein-bound iron, NO can inhibit a number of key enzymes that contain iron in their catalytic centers. These include ribonucleotide reductase (rate-limiting in DNA replication), iron-sulfur cluster-dependent enzymes (complex I and II) involved in mitochondrial electron transport and cis-aconitase in the citric acid cycle. In addition, higher concentrations of NO,... 

Now, we may consider in detail the mechanism of oxygen radical production by mitochondria. There are definite thermodynamic conditions, which regulate one-electron transfer from the electron carriers of mitochondrial respiratory chain to dioxygen these components must have the one-electron reduction potentials more negative than that of dioxygen Eq( 02 /02]) = —0.16 V. As the reduction potentials of components of respiratory chain are changed from 0.320 to +0.380 V, it is obvious that various sources of superoxide production may exist in mitochondria. As already noted earlier, the two main sources of superoxide are present in Complexes I and III of the respiratory chain in both of them, the role of ubiquinone seems to be dominant. Although superoxide may be formed by the one-electron oxidation of ubisemiquinone radical anion (Reaction (1)) [10,22] or even neutral semiquinone radical [9], the efficiency of these ways of superoxide formation in mitochondria is doubtful. 

D. Washo-Stultz, C. L. Crowley-Weber, K. Dvorakova, C. Bernstein, H. Bernstein, K. Kunke, C. N. Waltmire, H. Garewal and C. M. Payne, Role of mitochondrial complexes I and II, reactive oxygen species and arachidonic acid metabolism in deoxycholate-induced apoptosis. Cancer Lett., 2002, 177(2), 129. 

All of the complexes in the respiratory chain are made up of numerous polypeptides and contain a series of different protein bound redox coenzymes (see pp. 104, 106). These include flavins (FMN or FAD in complexes I and II), iron-sulfur clusters (in I, II, and III), and heme groups (in II, III, and IV). Of the more than 80 polypeptides in the respiratory chain, only 13 are coded by the mitochondrial genome (see p. 210). The remainder are encoded by nuclear genes, and have to be imported into the mitochondria after being synthesized in the cytoplasm (see... 

The inhibition of multisubstrate oxidation that involved complexes I and II, and the ubiquinone pool, observed with the allelochemlcals, can best be explained by alterations and perturbations induced to the inner membrane. No clear-cut evidence was obtained for interactions with specific complexes of the membranes. 

SCHEME 11. Models of oxo-Cr(V) complexes formed with 37 as proposed from room-temperature CW-EPR spectra. It was possible to confirm assignment of only the complexes I and II with low-temperature CW and pulsed EPR/ENDOR and DFT.52... 

Oxidizible substrates from glycolysis, fatty acid or protein catabolism enter the mitochondrion in the form of acetyl-CoA, or as other intermediaries of the Krebs cycle, which resides within the mitochondrial matrix. Reducing equivalents in the form of NADH and FADH pass electrons to complex I (NADH-ubiquinone oxidore-ductase) or complex II (succinate dehydrogenase) of the electron transport chain, respectively. Electrons pass from complex I and II to complex III (ubiquinol-cyto-chrome c oxidoreductase) and then to complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) which accumulates four electrons and then tetravalently reduces O2 to water. Protons are pumped into the inner membrane space at complexes I, II and IV and then diffuse down their concentration gradient through complex V (FoFi-ATPase), where their potential energy is captured in the form of ATP. In this way, ATP formation is coupled to electron transport and the formation of water, a process termed oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). 

The antihyperlipidemic drugs, such as clofibrate, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofi-brate and gemfibrozil are associated with liver toxicity and hepatomegaly in some patients. Fenofibrate inhibits complex I and to lesser extent complex V, whereas clofibrate inhibits predominantly complex V. Gemfibrozil also inhibits complex I, even more potently than fenofibrate [52, 53]. 

Figure 7-4. The electron transport chain. Electrons enter from NADH to complex I or succinate dehydrogenase, which is complex II. Electrons derived from glycolysis through the glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle, complex I, and complex II join at coenzyme Q and are transferred to oxygen as shown. As electrons pass through complexes I, III, and IV, protons are transported across the membrane, creating a pH gradient.

Electrons from both complex I and complex II are transferred to ubiquinone, a lipophilic compound residing in the membrane. 

It is noteworthy that except for the Rieske center in Complex III, Complexes I and 11 are home to all the iron-sulfur clusters in the mitochondrial electron transfer chain and consequently most of the iron-containing carriers in the entire sequence. Hibbs subsequently showed that CAM-injured cells lose a substantial portion of their total intracellular iron (Hibbs et al., 1984) [later studies specifically identified loss of mitochondrial iron (Wharton et al., 1988)] and Drapier and Hibbs (1986) showed that the activity of another iron-sulfur-containing enzyme, aconitase, is also lost. In early 1987 Hibbs reported that the cytostatic actions of CAMs requires the presence of only one component in culture medium, L-arginine (Hibbs et al., 1987b). Thus, the stage was set for the discovery of a unique reactive species that targets intracellular iron, produced by CAMs. 

Treatment of isolated hepatocytes with authentic nitric oxide inhibits the electron transport chain at complexes I and II, and mitochondrial aconitase activity (Stadler et al., 1991). 

Solvent or ligand Interactions with tight Ion pairs produce externally complexed tight Ion pairs and/or ligand separated Ion pairs. The stability of the complexes depends on solvent, temperature, type of crown and the nature of the cation. For example, In ethereal solvents benzo-15-crown-5 and fluorenyl sodium (Fl-.Na ) form the two Isomeric complexes I and II depicted In reaction 1, but the ratio I/II Is highly solvent sensitive (9) (If the bound solvent In II Is Included In the structure of II, the two complexes of course can actually not be considered Isomeric). 

An Important observation Is the concentration dependency of the ratio II/I (see equations 1 and 2). In a study of the complex formation between benzo-15-crown-5 and fluorenylsodlum In THF, 2-methyl-THF and THP the ratio of the two complexes I and II was found to depend not only on solvent but also on the total Ion pair concentration (14). The results were rationalized by assuming the formation of dimers of II on Increasing the Ion pair concentration as shown In reaction 3. Aggregation of complex I Is... 

A luminescent unit was prepared by the Shinozaki et al. (1) by mixing iridium complexes, (I) and (II), with bisphenol A diglycidyl ether and 5-methylhexa-hydrophthalic anhydride. Additional luminescent derivatives, (III) and (IV), were prepared by Igarashi (2). 

A fluorescence light was emitting polymeric iridium complex, (I), and a copolymer containing a fluoreneyl component, (II), was prepared by Nakatani et al. 

---