Combustion kinetic regimes

What follows is an attempt to give some insight into a problem that could arise in some cases related to combustion kinetics, but not necessarily related to the complete held of supercritical use as described in pure chemistry texts and papers. It is apparent that the high pressure in the supercritical regime not only affects the density (concentration) of the reactions, but also the dififusivity of the species that form during pyrolysis of important intermediates that occur in fuel pyrolysis. Indeed, as well, in considering the supercritical regime one must also be concerned that the normal state equation may not hold. 

Figure 5 Activity versus temperature plot for a combustion catalyst. A kinetic regime. B light-off, C mass transfer control. D homogeneous reactions. (From Ref. 15.)...

It is also necessary to explain why there are parentheses around the collision partner M in reactions (3.94), (3.95), and (3.99). When RH in reactions (3.94) and (3.95) is ethane and R in reaction (3.99) is the ethyl radical, the reaction order depends on the temperature and pressure range. Reactions (3.94), (3.95), and (3.99) for the ethane system are in the fall-off regime for most typical combustion conditions. Reactions (3.94) and (3.95) for propane may lie in the fall-off regime for some combustion conditions however, around 1 atm, butane and larger molecules pyrolyze near their high-pressure limits [34] and essentially follow first-order kinetics. Furthermore, for the formation of the olefin, an ethyl radical in reaction (3.99) must compete with the abstraction reaction. 

Thus, th in a kinetically controlled regime is described by a dl law. Furthermore, th is found to be inversely proportional to pressure (for a first-order reaction) under kinetically controlled combustion, and in contrast, independent of pressure under diffusionally controlled combustion (since D P-1). In the kinetically controlled regime, the burning rate depends exponentially upon temperature. 

If Da = 1 is defined as the transition between diffusionally controlled and kinetically controlled regimes, an inverse relationship is observed between the particle diameter and the system pressure and temperature for a fixed Da. Thus, for a system to be kinetically controlled, combustion temperatures need to be low (or the particle size has to be very small, so that the diffusive time scales are short relative to the kinetic time scale). Often for small particle diameters, the particle loses so much heat, so rapidly, that extinction occurs. Thus, the particle temperature is nearly the same as the gas temperature and to maintain a steady-state burning rate in the kinetically controlled regime, the ambient temperatures need to be high enough to sustain reaction. The above equation also shows that large particles at high pressure likely experience diffusion-controlled combustion, and small particles at low pressures often lead to kinetically controlled combustion. 

At low temperatures (T<1320 °C) and small particles, combustion regime (I) prevails [11,74,75]. Regime (I) is controlled by chemical kinetics intraparticle (reaction control), see Figure 55. The oxygen content is constant at any radius inside the particle since the rate of diffusion is fast compared to the rate of heterogeneous reaction. The particle then burns with reducing density and a constant diameter, see Figure 55. 

At higher temperatures (T>1320 °C) and larger particles, combustion regime (II) prevails [75], Regime (II) is controlled by both intraparticle diffusion and chemical kinetics. In this case the density and diameter decrease, see Figure 55. 

Figure 25.1 Regimes of turbulent combustion 1 — offshore flares, 2 — spark-ignition engines, 3 — supersonic combustion, Kl — turbulent kinetic energy referred to laminar ratio of kinematic viscocity to chemical time, — Damkohler number based on Kolmogorov scale, Ld — integral scale referred to thickness of laminar deflagration...

The study of kinetics at high temperatures should be begun precisely from the determination of the minimum reaction time corresponding to disruption of the combustion regime ( quenching, cf. [4]). Plotting the concentration of the initial substance in the reaction products as a function of the reaction time, we obtain for a typical exothermic reaction a dependence of the form in Fig. 7. 

The interest in the properties of the chars derived from cellulosic or biomass solid.s extends beyond those associated with thermal transport in the char. Insofar as the char residue from a pyrolysis process must typically be burned, gasified, or put to use as an activated carbon product, there is also a need to examine the porous nature of the char, bi acbvated carbons, the pore structure is key to adsorption performance. In combustion or gasification, the porosity can play a role in determining conversion kinetics in the intrinsic rate controlled or pore diffusion controlled regimes. 

When a detailed chemical description is not required, a limited set of a few stoichiometric equations can be included into the scheme just to describe the rate of heat evolution and change of total number of gas species in the system. Chemically oversimplified models of this kind are widely used, for instance, to describe heat-transfer and to optimize thermal regimes in reactors (see, e.g., Fukuhara and Igarashi, 2005 Kolios et al., 2001). A similar approach is used to describe the fuel combustion and corresponding dynamic phenomena in engines of different types simplified equations describing kinetic features are solved together with complex equations of heat- and mass-transfer and fluid dynamics (Frolov et al., 1997 Williams, 1997). 

Coal char combustion Phenomenological aspect In the regime of "low temperature," the chemical reaction rate is slow compared with the diffusion through the pores, because the O2 completely penetrates the char matrix. In this case the rate controlling the regime of char combustion is kinetically limited. 

---