Column internals flowrates

The absorption column is sized according to two key parameters, these are to design for optimum mass transfer and optimum unit cost. A column internal diameter can be estimated according to the liquid and gas flowrates by utilizing graphs and nomographs such as those contained in Ref. A3. These recommendations have been refined using a computer-based mathematical model. The model predicts the required number of trays for a specified column internal diameter. These results enable a compromise to be achieved between tower cost and tower performance. 

Reference A3 details the recommended plate configuration for liquid flowrate versus column internal diameter. This suggests a single-pass crossflow-type sieve plate as shown in Figure 9.1. 

Reference A3 (Figure 11.28) details the recommended plate configuration for liquid flowrate versus column internal diameter. A reverse flow-type sieve plate is suggested as shown in Figure 9.3. The pitch of the sieve-tray holes is selected so that the total hole area is reduced to 0.07 times the total column area. The other design criteria employed to provide the provisional plate specification are detailed in Table G,3. 

Type of HPLC column Internal diameter (mm) Length (mm) Particle size (pm) Sample load (pg) Flowrate (pL/min)... 

The last column in Tables 4-110 and 4-111 show the thrust load associated with each circulation floWrate (i.e.,-pressure drop). This thrust load is the result of the pressure drop across the turbine motor rotor and stator blades. -The magnitude. of this pressure drop, depends. on the individual internal design details of the turbine motor (i.e., blade angle, number of stages, axial height of blades and The radial width of the blades) and the operating conditions. The additional pressure. drop results in thrust, T (lb), whicit is... 

Fig. 2.22. Chromatograms of methanohwater (50 per cent, v/v) saffron extracts from Mancha (a), Rio (b) and Sierra (c) types, simultaneously recorded at 250, 310 and 440 nm, including 4-nitroaniline as internal standard. The mobile and stationary phases were a linear gradient of methanol-water from 20 to 70 per cent in 50min, and an ODS column, respectively. The flowrate was lml/min, temperature 30°C and sample size 50/jl. The following compounds are present picrocrocin (1), HTCC (2), 3-entiobiosile-kaempferol (3), a-crocin (4), crocin 2 (5), crocin 3 (6), safranal (7), crocin 4 (8), crocin 5 (9), crocin 6(10) and internal standard (I>S.). Reprinted with permission from R Lozano et al. [47].

We obtained the best results with the Carbopack B-DA/4% Carbowax 20M, 80-120 mesh Supelco column, 2000 x 2 mm. It was initially conditioned for 21 h at 245°C, but the normal running temperature is 175°C. The injector/detector temperature is 200°C and a flame ionization detector is used. A glass sleeve is fitted to the injector and the glass wool plug removed from the column inlet. The carrier gas is nitrogen with a flowrate of 40 ml min at 310 kN m. The sample solution (9 ml) is mixed with 1 ml of pivalic acid solution (1.5% m/v) as internal standard. Then 1 ml of this solution is mixed with 1 ml 0.3 M oxalic acid solution and 3 ml deionized water before injecting 1 pi into the septum. 

We experimented firstly with a Phenomenex Rezex ROA-Organic Acid 300 X 7.8 mm column with a Rezex Organic Acid 50 x 7.8 mm guard column the mobile phase was 0.013 N (0.0065 M) H2SO4. UV detection was at 215 nm, the flowrate 0.6 ml min, column temperature 35°C and injection volume 20 pi. The internal standard was 2-ethylbutyric acid. The lactic acid peak was preceded by a partially overlapping, probably succinic acid peak the... 

Figure 6.2 A comparison of HPLC separation methods, (a) HPLC of a-chaconine and a-solanine in the flesh and the peel of one variety of potato. Conditions column, Inertsil NH2 (5 xm, 4.0 X 250 mm) mobile phase, acetonitile/20 mM KH2PO4 (80 20, v/v) flow rate, I.OmL/min column temperature, 20°C UV detector, 208 nm sample size, 20 (xL. (b) HPLC chromatogram of approximately 1 xg of each of potato glycoalkaloids and their hydrolysis products 1, solasonine (internal standard) 2, a-solanine 3, a-chaconine 4, P2-solanine 5, pi-chaconine 6, (32-chaconine 7, y-solanine 8, y-chaconine. Conditions column. Resolve Cl 8 (5 (xm, 3.9 x 300 mm) mobile phase, 35% acetonitrile/100 mM ammonium phosphate (monobasic) at pH 3 flowrate, I.OmL/min column temperature, ambient UV detector, 200 nm sample size, (c) HPLC chromatogram of the aglycones solanidine and solasodine. Conditions column Supelcosil C18-DB (3 (xm, 4.6x150 mm) mobile phase, 60% acetonitrile/10 mM ammonium phosphate pH 2.5 flowrate, 1.0 mL/min column temperature, ambient UV detector, 200 nm.

The pilot plant is composed of 8 columns of 33 mm of internal diameter connected in series. Six automated valves are placed after each column in order to connect the columns to the different inlets and outlets of the process (See figure 3). Analogical valves are located after each column (Un) and are used to control the pressures in the different zones of the process. Five analogical valves control inlets and outlets flowrates. 

Similar problems can occur with vapor sidestreams, but the solution is not as easy because we cannot provide vapor holdup in the system. One approach is to use an internal vapor controller. The flowrate of the vapor sidestream and the flowrate of the steam to the reboiler are measured. The net flowrate of vapor up the column above the vapor sidestream drawoff tray is calculated. This flow is then controlled by manipulating the vapor sidestream drawoff rate. 

Dynamic simulations of this on-demand control scheme verified that it works. However, a production rate change produces a dynamic response that is quite different from that shown in Fig. 11.4. For example the column is upset immediately whereas conditions in the reactor change slowly. Overall it appears that the internal time dynamics are slower for this on-demand scheme than when the reactor conditions are changed first. However, this control structure fulfills the control objective of providing immediate changes in the flowrate of the product stream. 

The dynamic model proposed proved to represent well the separation in a DWC of a ternary hydrocarbon mixture. The values of internal flows and temperature distributions along the trays reached at steady state were in good agreement with the simulations obtained in the frame of commercial simulators. The use as control variables the reflux ratio or the side-stream flowrate proved to enable a reduction of the startup time with about 70 % compared with classical startup procedures. The complex technique developed can be a useful tool in studying dynamic behavior and startup optimization for complex columns and can be easily extended to various mixtures. 

Typically, the quantity of distillate product that is being condensed and returned to the top of the column needs to be specified. It can be defined as either an internal or external quantity depending upon which variables are used. The internal reflux ratio is defined in terms of flowrates within the rectifying section of the colunm ... 

The first approach we might take is to increase the plate number. This could be done by optimizing mobile phase flowrate but, as noted, column manufacturers already have designed columns to operate at an optimal flowrate, thus litde improvement could be expected by this means. We could also obtain a column with a lower overall plate number, perhaps a better packed column with a lower Hed- However, for a given particle size, most commercial columns are fairly competitive in terms of efficiency and cost (a well-packed conventional HPLC column with a 4.6 mm internal diameter packed with 5 pm spheres can reach, and at times exceed, plate counts of... 

The mass balance for the column has now been completely specified since all the compositions in all the product streams are knowa All product flowrates can therefore also be calculated. In this specific example, it can be shown that D = 0.299, B == 0.318, and 5 = 0.383 mol/s. It can then be shown through Figure 6.19 that the difference point of the internal CS, CS2, is... 

Both configurations can be divided into four CSs for the case of a ternary system where we wish to obtain relatively pure distillate, bottoms, and sidestream products. For the sake of consistency, the side unithas been numbered as CS4 while the internal CS is labeled as CS2 in both configurations. In the side-stripper unit, the liquid coming from CSi is divided into two streams one that is directed to the main column body and another one that is directed toward the side-stripping unit. The vapor flow in CSi is also the sum of the vapor flows from the side stripping unit and the main column. Similarly, the vapor flow from CS3 in the side rectifier is directed toward the main column and the rectifying unit, while the liquid flowrate in CS3 is the sum of the liquid flowrates in the main column and the rectifier. The location of the sidestream withdrawal and addition at the thermally coupled junction are assumed to take place at the same location. This assumption can be relaxed however, an additional CS would be created and this case will not be further discussed in this text... 

The central decision is the type of internals tray, packing or structured packing. The choice depends on the flowrates, the characteristics of the fluids, the operating temperature and pressure, the allowable pressure drop across the column, the materials of construction and the fouling and corrosivity of the system. 

Column 250 X 4.6 internal surface reversed-phase silica (Pinkerton) (Regis Chemical) Mobile phase Isopropanol 100 mM pH 6.8 KH2PO4 10 90 Flowrate 1 Injection volume 10... 

Column 150 X 4.6 5 p-m internal-surface, reversed-phase, Pinkerton-type, silica deriva-tized with glycine-phenylalanine-phenylalanine (Regis) (periodically reverse the column) Mobile phase 100 mM pH 6.8 phosphate buffer Flowrate 0.3 Iqjection volume 10 Detector UV 275... 

Figure 4 HPLC separation of a standard mixture of 10 pg each of D-ribose, ribitol, arabitol, and mannitol on a MicroPak SP NHa-S (4 mm ID x 150 mm) column. Solvent, acetonitrile-water (80 20, v/v), isocratically. Flowrate, 1.3ml min h Peaks 1 =o-riboseas internal standard 2 = ribitol 3 = arabitol 4 = mannitol. The line drawn across the chromatogram indicates baseline correction.

Stable over extended periods. Ideally you would want a standard that could be used for months or years on end. Because the addition of an internal standard to samples serves to correct for instrument performance variation, the use of an internal standard in the control standard can effectively mask many instrumental performance problems and defeat the effectiveness of statistical process control. The control standard should therefore not contain any internal standard. Each time the control standard is analyzed, its result should be added to the control chart, and the result analyzed within the context of previous analyses of that control standard. All pertinent data should be recorded in the instrument logbook. This would include gas cylinder changes, septum changes, all maintenance, column changes, and flowrate adjustments. 

Note that the Zob(C) = 0.05 disturbance (Fig. 11.23), which crashed the two-temperature control scheme, causes no problem in the internal composition control structure and that the time scale has been increased to 300 min to make sure that there is long-term instability. The internal composition controller detects the increase in reactant A composition on tray 6 because there is less B coming into the column in the Fqa feed. The composition controller reduces the flowrate of Fqa. The temperature on tray 3 increases as less D is produced because less B is entering the column. The temperature controller cuts back on the vapor boilup, and the reflux ratio cuts back on the reflux. The final steady state produces somewhat lower purity bottoms and less of it. Distillate purity is higher with only a slightly lower flowrate because of the C coming in with the Fqb feed. 

---